Grinding Gear Games isn't just making a sequel. They're trying to reinvent the entire Action RPG genre while keeping the hardcore "spreadsheet" fans happy. It’s a tightrope walk. Everyone is staring at the Path of Exile 2 Metacritic page right now because it represents a massive shift in how we play these types of games. We’ve moved away from the mindless "zoom-zoom" gameplay of the first game into something that feels way more deliberate, almost like a Soulslike had a baby with a traditional isometric looter.
People are obsessed with these scores. Why? Because the original Path of Exile basically became the gold standard after Diablo 3 stumbled. Now, with the sequel hitting Early Access and moving toward a full launch, the critical reception isn't just about a number; it’s a verdict on whether "complex and difficult" can still win in a market that usually prefers "streamlined and easy."
The Reality Behind the Path of Exile 2 Metacritic Numbers
If you head over to Metacritic, you’ll notice something interesting about how critics approach this game. Most reviewers aren't just looking at the graphics, which, honestly, are gorgeous. They are looking at the friction. Early reviews and "in-progress" scores highlight that this is a game that wants to kill you. Often.
Unlike Diablo 4, which aimed for a massive, broad audience, Path of Exile 2 is doubling down on depth. This makes the Path of Exile 2 Metacritic score a bit of a battleground. You have the "purists" who think it's a masterpiece of systems design, and then you have the more casual reviewers who might find the sheer density of the Skill Gem system and the new dodge roll mechanic a bit much to swallow.
The game sits in a weird spot. It's technically in a "live" state, meaning those Metacritic scores fluctuate as GGG pushes out patches. It’s not like a single-player RPG where you play 40 hours, slap a 9/10 on it, and go home. This is an evolving organism.
💡 You might also like: Wordle August 19th: Why This Puzzle Still Trips People Up
What the Critics Love (and What They Hate)
Let’s be real for a second. The combat in the first game was... floaty? You basically just held down one button and watched the entire screen explode in colorful lights. In the sequel, things have changed. Critics are praising the weight of the combat. Every swing of a mace or cast of a spell feels like it has actual physical presence.
- The Boss Fights: Every single boss in the campaign has unique mechanics. It’s not just a stat check anymore. You can't just out-gear a boss; you have to learn the dance. This is where the high scores come from.
- The Skill System: The way skills are handled now—cutting the link between your armor and your gems—is a godsend. Reviewers have highlighted this as a massive quality-of-life improvement.
- The Difficulty: This is the "divider." Some critics find it refreshing that a game doesn't hold their hand. Others? They get frustrated when a random elite pack sends them back to the checkpoint.
The User Score vs. The Critic Score
We’ve all seen it happen before. A game gets a 90 from critics and a 4.0 from users. Or vice versa. With Path of Exile 2 Metacritic trends, the gap usually comes down to "The Vision." Grinding Gear Games, led by Jonathan Rogers, has a very specific vision for what an ARPG should be. They don't mind if a certain percentage of players find it too hard.
That "take it or leave it" attitude often polarizes user reviews. You’ll see 10/10 reviews from people who have played 5,000 hours of the original and love the new challenge. Then you’ll see 0/10 reviews from people who just wanted to relax after work and found themselves getting stomped by a goatman in Act 1.
The "Review Bombing" phenomenon is also a factor. If GGG makes a balance change that nerfs a popular build—like the lightning-based casters or the new Mercenary class—you can bet the user score will dip within hours. It’s a reactionary metric.
📖 Related: Wordle Answers July 29: Why Today’s Word Is Giving Everyone a Headache
Technical Performance and Its Impact on Scoring
You can’t talk about Metacritic without talking about performance. Path of Exile 2 is a beast. The lighting engine is doing things that most isometric games shouldn't be able to do. But that comes at a cost.
Early impressions often mentioned stuttering or server issues during high-traffic windows. For a reviewer, a crash during a high-stakes boss fight is an automatic point deduction. GGG has been fast with hotfixes, but those initial "Day One" impressions stick around in the aggregate score. If you're looking at the Path of Exile 2 Metacritic page and see mentions of "technical hurdles," keep in mind that those reviews might have been written three patches ago.
Is the Skill Ceiling Too High for a High Score?
There's a theory in gaming journalism that extremely complex games struggle to maintain a "Universal Acclaim" (90+) rating because some reviewers simply won't "get" the systems in time for their deadline.
To truly understand Path of Exile 2, you need to understand:
👉 See also: Why the Pokemon Gen 1 Weakness Chart Is Still So Confusing
- The Passive Skill Tree (which is massive, though slightly more intuitive now).
- The interactions between different elemental types.
- How the new Spirit system manages your mana and buffs.
- The nuances of the WASD movement versus traditional click-to-move.
That’s a lot to ask of someone who has a week to write 1,200 words and move on to the next game. Consequently, the most accurate reviews often come from niche PC gaming outlets that specialize in the genre.
Comparing the Sequel to the Original’s Legacy
The first Path of Exile didn't actually start with a staggering Metacritic score. It built its reputation over a decade. It’s a "slow burn" game. The sequel is launching with much more hype, which is a double-edged sword.
Expectations are through the roof. When people see the Path of Exile 2 Metacritic score, they are comparing it to the current state of PoE 1, which has ten years of content. That’s an unfair fight. The sequel is a platform. It’s a foundation. Reviewers who understand this tend to give it higher marks for its potential, whereas those looking for a "finished, static product" might be more critical of the content gaps that naturally exist in a new release.
Actionable Insights for Players Following the Scores
If you’re using Metacritic to decide whether to dive into Wraeclast, don't just look at the big green or yellow number.
- Read the "Mixed" Reviews: These often contain the most honest critiques of the game's difficulty and complexity. If the reviewer complains about "too much thinking," and you love theory-crafting, that "negative" review is actually a green light for you.
- Watch the User Score Trends: If the user score suddenly drops, check the PoE subreddit or official forums. It usually points to a specific technical issue or a controversial balance patch rather than a fundamental flaw in the game itself.
- Ignore the "Diablo-Killer" Headlines: These are clickbait. Path of Exile 2 isn't trying to kill anything; it’s trying to be the best version of itself. The Metacritic score reflects how well it achieves its own goals, not how it stacks up against a Blizzard title.
The most important takeaway is that Path of Exile 2 Metacritic scores are a snapshot in time for a game that is designed to be played for the next ten years. The score today is just the beginning of the story. If you like deep systems, punishing but fair combat, and a game that treats you like an adult, the numbers on a review site matter a lot less than the feel of the controller or keyboard in your hands.
Check the system requirements before you buy. This game is heavy on the GPU. If you're running an older card, your personal "user score" is going to be a lot lower due to frame drops. Upgrade your drivers, clear your schedule, and prepare to die—a lot. Wraeclast isn't any friendlier the second time around.