You can still hear the echoes of the "Super Saturday" era if you close your eyes at Flushing Meadows. Tennis has changed, sure. We have Hawk-Eye Live now, and the courts are technically a different shade of blue, but the list of past winners of US Open history isn't just a spreadsheet of names; it’s a chaotic, loud, and often unfair map of how the sport actually evolved. Honestly, if you look at the names etched on that trophy, you realize the US Open has always been the "black sheep" of the Grand Slams. It’s where the weather is miserable, the fans are rowdy, and the legends often go to get humbled.
Think about Pete Sampras.
In 1990, Sampras was basically a kid with a huge serve and zero expectations. He took down Agassi in a final that felt like a shift in the tectonic plates of the ATP. Then, twelve years later, he walks out as a "washed up" veteran, beats Agassi again, and just... leaves. That’s the magic of the New York bracket. It’s not like Wimbledon where there’s a sense of prestige and quiet. The US Open is a street fight in sneakers.
The Brutality of the Hard Court Era
The transition from grass to clay (for a hot minute) and finally to DecoTurf hard courts in 1978 changed everything. If you check out the past winners of US Open titles in the late 70s, you see Jimmy Connors looming over everyone. Connors is actually the only guy to win the tournament on three different surfaces: grass, clay, and hard. That’s a stat that doesn't get enough love. It shows a level of adaptability that modern players, who are mostly hard-court specialists, might struggle with.
Hard courts are unforgiving. They chew up knees and reward players who can take the ball on the rise. Look at Monica Seles in the early 90s. She was hitting the ball so hard and so flat that it felt like she was playing a different sport. Her wins in '91 and '92 were dominant, but they also highlighted the "New York" style—aggressive, loud, and relentless.
When the Underdogs Bit Back
Sometimes the draw just falls apart. You’ve seen it happen.
In 2014, Marin Cilic and Kei Nishikori played a final that absolutely nobody predicted. Roger Federer and Novak Djokovic were both in the semis, and everyone assumed we’d get another "Big Three" masterclass. Instead, Cilic turned into a human serving machine. It was a weird year. But it proved that the US Open, more than the French or Wimbledon, is susceptible to a "hot hand." If you can survive the humidity of a night session in Queens for two weeks, you’ve got a shot.
🔗 Read more: When is Georgia's next game: The 2026 Bulldog schedule and what to expect
Juan Martín del Potro in 2009 is another one. He was 20 years old, hitting forehands that sounded like literal gunshots, and he took down Federer in five sets. Federer was at the peak of his powers then. He’d won five straight US Opens. Five! Nobody had done that since Bill Tilden in the 1920s. Del Potro broke that streak and, in many ways, changed the trajectory of the next decade of tennis.
Serena, Steffi, and the Queens of Queens
The women’s side of the past winners of US Open ledger is even more legendary because of the sheer longevity of some of these runs. Chris Evert won six. Serena Williams won six. But the way they won was totally different. Evert was "The Ice Maiden," out-thinking people until they collapsed. Serena was a force of nature.
Remember 1999?
Serena was only 17. She had to go through Kim Clijsters, Conchita Martínez, Monica Seles, Lindsay Davenport, and Martina Hingis. That is a gauntlet of Hall of Famers. Winning that title signaled the end of the "touch and feel" era of women’s tennis and ushered in the era of raw, unadulterated power.
Then you have Steffi Graf. Between 1988 and 1996, she won five titles. People forget how fast Steffi was. Her "Golden Slam" in '88—winning all four majors and Olympic Gold—included a US Open final against Gabriela Sabatini that was closer than the scoreline suggested. Steffi’s slice backhand on a fast New York hard court was basically unplayable. It stayed so low that opponents were basically hitting off their shoelaces.
The Weird Gap in the Early 2000s
After Sampras retired and before the Big Three truly locked down the sport, the US Open was a bit of a free-for-all. You had Lleyton Hewitt scurrying around the baseline in 2001, making everyone miserable. You had Andy Roddick in 2003, which, incredibly, remains the last time an American man won a singles Grand Slam.
💡 You might also like: Vince Carter Meme I Got One More: The Story Behind the Internet's Favorite Comeback
It’s been over twenty years.
Roddick’s win was supposed to be the start of a new American dynasty. He had the 140-mph serve and the visor. But then a guy named Roger Federer decided he liked winning in New York too. Federer’s run from 2004 to 2008 is arguably the highest level of tennis ever played on a hard court. He wasn't just winning; he was making elite players look like they’d never held a racket before.
Why the US Open Creates One-Hit Wonders
There’s something about the end of the season that creates "lightning in a bottle" moments. By the time players get to Flushing Meadows in late August, they are exhausted. Their joints hurt. Their brains are fried from the tour. This is why the list of past winners of US Open trophies includes people like Emma Raducanu or Bianca Andreescu.
Raducanu’s 2021 run was statistically impossible. She came through qualifying. She didn't drop a single set. She was ranked 150th in the world. In any other sport, that’s a Disney movie script that gets rejected for being too unrealistic. But New York feeds on that energy. The crowd gets behind a teenager or a "nobody," and suddenly the seeded players start tightening up.
The Evolution of Surface Speed
People argue about this all the time in tennis forums. Was the court faster in the 90s?
The short answer is yes. In the days of Stefan Edberg and Boris Becker (who both won here), the surface was slicker. Serve-and-volley was a viable strategy. You could chip and charge your way to a title. Today, the court is grittier. The ball bounces higher and moves slower, which is why we see these grueling four-hour baseline rallies. Novak Djokovic has thrived in this environment because he’s basically a human wall. His four titles ('11, '15, '18, '23) are a testament to his ability to outlast the environment as much as the opponent.
📖 Related: Finding the Best Texas Longhorns iPhone Wallpaper Without the Low-Res Junk
Real Talk: The Most Underrated Winners
If we’re being honest, some winners get lost in the shuffle of history.
- Stan Wawrinka (2016): Everyone talks about his French Open win, but his US Open victory over Djokovic was a masterpiece of "heavy" tennis. He just bullied the best defender in history.
- Justine Henin (2003, 2007): She was tiny compared to the power hitters, but her one-handed backhand was a tactical weapon. Her 2007 run was particularly insane—she beat both Williams sisters back-to-back.
- Kim Clijsters (2009): Coming back from retirement and winning as a wildcard/mother? That doesn't happen. It’s one of the greatest "feel-good" stories in the history of the sport.
The US Open doesn't care about your resume. It cares about who is toughest on a humid Tuesday night at 1:00 AM in front of a crowd that’s had a few too many Honey Deuce cocktails.
How to Use This History to Your Advantage
If you’re a fan, a bettor, or just a tennis nerd trying to predict the next champion, stop looking at the rankings. Start looking at these three specific factors that define past winners of US Open success:
1. Night Session Temperament
Arthur Ashe Stadium is the biggest tennis stadium in the world. It’s a pressure cooker. Players who struggle with noise or distractions usually flame out in the quarterfinals. Look for athletes who have played "big" matches in loud environments (like Davis Cup or noisy home tournaments).
2. The "Summer Swing" Momentum
New York rarely rewards someone who hasn't played since Wimbledon. Check the results of the "US Open Series" (Cincinnati and Canada). Almost every winner in the last twenty years reached at least a semi-final in one of those tune-up events.
3. Fitness in High Humidity
This is the "physical" slam. The USTA Billie Jean King National Tennis Center gets stiflingly hot. Players who rely on short points (serve-and-volleyers) often struggle more than the grinders who have high-level aerobic capacity.
The history of the US Open is a history of chaos. It’s the tournament that broke Federer’s streak, gave Serena her start, and allowed a qualifier to win the whole thing. It’s unpredictable, loud, and completely exhausting. And that’s exactly why we keep watching.
For those tracking the current era, the best move is to watch the transition from the "hard court masters" to the new generation of all-court sliders. The game is getting faster again, and the next names on this list will likely be those who can defend like Djokovic but finish points like Sampras. Keep an eye on the youngsters who don't just hit hard, but who actually know how to use the geometry of the court to their advantage.