Past and Past Continuous: The Grammar Rules English Speakers Actually Use

Past and Past Continuous: The Grammar Rules English Speakers Actually Use

English grammar is weird. We spend years in school memorizing charts, only to realize that when we're actually grabbing a coffee or telling a story at a bar, half those rules feel like they've evaporated. One of the biggest hangups? Figuring out when to use past and past continuous without sounding like a textbook from 1985. You’ve probably been there—pausing mid-sentence, wondering if you "watched" a movie or "were watching" it. Honestly, it's the difference between a story that flows and one that just... clunks.

Most people think it’s just about time. It isn't.

The Real Difference Between the Two

The simple past is your "done deal" tense. You went to the store. You bought milk. You came home. It’s a series of points on a line, finished and dusted. But the past continuous? That’s the "vibe" tense. It’s the background noise. It’s what was happening when the interesting stuff actually went down. Think of it like a movie: the past continuous is the set-up, the scenery, and the atmosphere, while the simple past is the action, the jump scare, or the punchline.

If you say "It rained," you’re just stating a dry fact (no pun intended). If you say "It was raining," you’re setting a scene. You’re inviting the listener to imagine the puddles and the gray sky before you tell them about the car splash that ruined your suit.

📖 Related: East Bay Pie Company: Why Everyone is Obsessed With These Savory Hand Pies

Why "Was Walking" Isn't Just "Walked" (But Longer)

I see this a lot in writing workshops. People think adding "-ing" just makes things sound more descriptive. Not exactly. There’s a specific psychological trigger involved here called "aspect." While the past simple is perfective (it views the action as a whole), the continuous is imperfective. It’s unfinished.

Let's look at a classic example:

  1. I read a book last night.
  2. I was reading a book last night.

In the first one, you likely finished it. Or at least, the act of reading is the main event you're reporting. In the second one, you’re basically telling me that something interrupted you. "I was reading a book last night... when the power went out." See? The continuous tense creates a "to be continued" energy that the simple past just can't touch.

The "Interrupt" Rule Everyone Forgets

This is where past and past continuous work together like a team. Grammarians call this the "interrupted action." You use the continuous for the long, ongoing background action and the simple past for the short, sharp interruption.

Imagine you’re cooking dinner. That’s the background. It takes time. Then, you cut your finger. That’s a sudden moment.
"I was cooking dinner when I cut my finger."
Flip it, and it sounds insane. "I cooked dinner when I was cutting my finger." That implies you spent thirty minutes slicing your thumb while somehow roasting a chicken. Doesn't work. Logic matters.

Context is Everything

Sometimes, the choice between the two is just about how much of a drama queen you want to be. Seriously. If I say "I worked there for ten years," it’s a flat, historical fact. If I say "I was working there for ten years," it feels more temporary or like a lead-up to a change. It feels more personal.

Ray Murphy, the guy who basically wrote the bible on English Grammar (English Grammar in Use), points out that we use the continuous to show that something was in progress around a specific time. If you say "At 8:00 I had dinner," it means you started eating at 8:00. If you say "At 8:00 I was having dinner," it means you were already mid-pasta when the clock struck eight.

Stative Verbs: The Great "Ing" Trap

You can't just slap an "-ing" on every verb. This is where even advanced learners trip up. Some verbs are "stative"—they describe states, not actions.

  • Love
  • Hate
  • Know
  • Believe
  • Want

You don't usually say "I was knowing the answer." You just knew it. You don't say "I was wanting a sandwich." You wanted one. Now, modern English is getting a bit loose with this—thanks, McDonald’s "I’m lovin’ it"—but in 99% of professional or clear communication, you stick to the simple past for these.

Narrative Flow: How to Actually Tell a Story

If you want to sound like a native speaker, you need to master the "scene-setting" technique.

🔗 Read more: Why Columbia Hiking Shoes Men’s Styles Are Actually Everywhere Right Now

Start with the background (Past Continuous): "The sun was setting. The birds were chirping. People were rushing home from work."
Then, drop the hammer (Simple Past): "Suddenly, I saw him."

This creates a layer of depth. If you just used simple past for everything ("The sun set. The birds chirped. People rushed. I saw him."), it sounds like a police report. Boring. Short sentences are great for impact, but you need that continuous flow to give them weight.

The "While" vs. "When" Debate

Usually, we use "while" with the past continuous because "while" implies duration.
"While I was sleeping..."
We use "when" with the simple past because "when" usually marks a specific point in time.
"...when the alarm went off."

You can swap them, but it gets tricky. "When I was sleeping" is fine, but "While the alarm went off" sounds like the alarm was ringing for a very, very long time. Which, to be fair, is how it feels on a Monday morning.

Common Misconceptions

A big one is that the past continuous is "more polite." You might hear someone say "I was wondering if you could help me." Why not "I wondered"?
The continuous version feels less direct. It’s softer. It suggests the thought was floating around in your head for a bit, rather than being a sharp demand you just came up with. It’s a subtle social nuance that makes a huge difference in how people perceive you.

Another mistake? Using the continuous for habits.
Wrong: "I was going to the gym every day last year."
Right: "I went to the gym every day last year" or "I used to go."
The continuous is for a specific moment or period of progress, not a recurring routine that happened over and over.

Real-World Application

Think about your last vacation. If you’re writing a blog post or an email, use the past and past continuous to separate the "vibe" from the "events."
"We were sitting on the beach (vibe) when we decided to get married (event)."
It anchors the big moments in a physical reality. It makes your listener feel like they were there with you, seeing what you were seeing.

Actionable Steps for Mastery

Stop overthinking the "rules" and start listening for the "why."

First, try a "split-screen" exercise. Take a single event (like a car crash or a meeting) and write down three things that were happening in the background using the continuous tense. Then, write three things that actually happened using the simple past.

💡 You might also like: Why Your Chocolate Chunk Pumpkin Bread Is Always Soggy (And How To Fix It)

Second, watch a movie scene on mute. Describe the background actions: "The crowd was moving, the lights were flickering." Then, describe the main action when you hit play: "The hero walked in."

Third, audit your emails. If you’re asking for a favor, try using "I was hoping" or "I was wondering." Notice how it changes the tone. It feels less like a task and more like a conversation.

Lastly, pay attention to "stative" verbs. If you catch yourself saying "I was needing," stop. Correct it to "I needed." It’s a small tweak, but it immediately levels up your perceived fluency.

Grammar isn't just about being "correct." It’s about being understood and creating a specific feeling in the person reading your words. Use the simple past to move the story forward. Use the past continuous to let the reader breathe and see the world you're building. Once you get that balance right, everything else starts to fall into place.