Honestly, it feels like forever since we all sat in a dark theater watching a younger, smirking James Franco get sucked into a CGI tornado. Remember 2013? Disney was on a massive "live-action prequel" kick, trying to catch lightning in a bottle after the billion-dollar success of Tim Burton’s Alice in Wonderland. They landed on the James Franco Wizard of Oz movie, officially titled Oz the Great and Powerful. It was supposed to be the next big thing. A new trilogy. A theme park staple.
But then... it just kinda stayed there.
It didn't fail, but it didn't exactly change the world either. If you go back and watch it now, the movie is this weird, beautiful, slightly awkward bridge between Sam Raimi’s horror-tinged style and Disney’s corporate polish. James Franco plays Oscar Diggs, a "small-time circus magician with dubious ethics." Basically, he’s a con man from Kansas who finds himself in a prophecy he didn't ask for. It’s a prequel to L. Frank Baum’s 1900 novel and an homage to the 1939 classic, but it had to navigate some seriously tricky legal waters to even exist.
Why the James Franco Wizard of Oz Movie Looked So Different
You might have noticed something odd while watching Oz the Great and Powerful. Where were the ruby slippers? Why was the Wicked Witch’s skin a slightly different shade of green?
Here’s the deal: Warner Bros. owns the rights to the 1939 MGM film. Disney owns the rights to the original books by L. Frank Baum, which are in the public domain. This created a massive headache for the production team. They couldn't use anything "iconic" from the 1939 movie. No ruby slippers. No specific spiral design for the Yellow Brick Road. Even the mole on the Wicked Witch's chin was a legal liability.
📖 Related: Isaiah Washington Movies and Shows: Why the Star Still Matters
Director Sam Raimi and production designer Robert Stromberg had to reinvent the wheel. Stromberg, who worked on Avatar and Alice in Wonderland, built around 30 massive sets in Pontiac, Michigan. They didn't shoot a single frame outdoors. Every sky, every blade of grass, and every jagged mountain was either built on a soundstage or rendered in a computer. This gives the movie that hyper-saturated, almost "video game" look that people either love or totally hate.
The Casting Carousel: It Wasn't Always Franco
It’s hard to imagine anyone else in that top hat now, but James Franco wasn't the first choice. Not even the second.
- Robert Downey Jr. was the original pick. He passed.
- Johnny Depp was up next. He also said no.
- James Franco eventually stepped in, reuniting with Sam Raimi after their Spider-Man trilogy days.
The cast around him was actually pretty stacked. You had Michelle Williams as Glinda, Rachel Weisz as Evanora, and Mila Kunis as Theodora. Zach Braff voiced Finley the Flying Monkey, providing the comic relief, while Joey King voiced the China Girl—easily the most heart-wrenching character in the whole film.
Behind the Scenes Magic and Training
James Franco didn't just show up and wing the magic. He actually spent two weeks in Las Vegas working with professional magician Lance Burton. He learned how to handle doves, work with fire, and pull objects out of thin air. He wanted the sleight of hand to look real, even if the fireballs coming out of the witches' hands were clearly added in post-production.
👉 See also: Temuera Morrison as Boba Fett: Why Fans Are Still Divided Over the Daimyo of Tatooine
Speaking of the witches, the makeup was an ordeal. Howard Berger, an Oscar-winning makeup artist, handled the transformation for the Wicked Witch. It took hours every day to get that green prosthetic just right. They wanted a look that honored the original but stayed within those strict legal boundaries I mentioned earlier.
The story itself tries to be a redemption arc. Oscar starts as a guy who only cares about "fame and fortune." He’s a womanizer. He treats his assistant (Braff) like garbage. By the end, he has to choose between being a "good man" or a "great one." It’s a bit heavy-handed, but it fits the fable vibe Raimi was going for.
The Box Office Reality
Was it a hit? Sorta.
The movie cost a staggering $215 million to make. That doesn't even count the marketing budget, which was likely another $100 million. It ended up grossing about $493 million worldwide. In Hollywood math, that’s a "modest success." It made a profit of roughly $36 million after all the bills were paid. Disney initially greenlit a sequel, but years passed, Franco’s career hit some public road blocks, and the project eventually fizzled out.
What Most People Get Wrong About the Movie
One of the biggest misconceptions is that this is a "remake." It’s absolutely not. It’s a prequel set 20 years before Dorothy arrives. It tries to explain how a circus performer from Kansas ended up as a "head in a cloud of smoke" ruling the Emerald City.
✨ Don't miss: Why Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy Actors Still Define the Modern Spy Thriller
Another weird detail: The film starts in black and white with a 4:3 aspect ratio (the square look of old TVs). When Oscar arrives in Oz, the screen literally stretches out into widescreen and the color bleeds in. It’s a direct nod to the 1939 film’s transition from sepia to Technicolor. Raimi insisted on this to give the audience that same sense of "wow" that people felt back in the 30s.
Is It Worth a Rewatch?
If you're a fan of Sam Raimi’s specific brand of weirdness—look for the "jump scares" with the baboons—it’s definitely worth a look. The chemistry between the three witches is great, and the China Girl sequence is genuinely beautiful filmmaking.
However, some critics at the time felt Franco was "miscast." They argued he felt too modern for a period piece set in the early 1900s. Whether you agree with that or not, there's no denying the visual ambition of the project. It’s a snapshot of a specific era in Disney filmmaking where they were betting big on high-fantasy spectacles.
Actionable Insights for Oz Fans
If you want to dive deeper into the world of this specific movie or the Oz franchise, here is what you should do next:
- Check out the "Art of Oz" books: The production design by Robert Stromberg is much more impressive when you see the concept art. The level of detail in the Emerald City’s Art Deco architecture is wild.
- Watch for the Sam Raimi Easter Eggs: Look for the "Point of View" shots during the Dark Forest scene. Those distorted angles are a classic Raimi move, used in everything from Evil Dead to Spider-Man.
- Compare the "Man Behind the Curtain": If you have the 1939 film, watch the ending and then re-watch the finale of the 2013 movie. You can see exactly how they tried to line up Franco’s "magic tricks" with the technology the older Wizard uses to fool Dorothy.
- Listen to Danny Elfman’s Score: Elfman and Raimi have a long history (and a brief falling out). This score is one of Elfman's more whimsical, "fairytale" efforts, and it carries a lot of the emotional weight that the script sometimes misses.
The James Franco Wizard of Oz movie remains a fascinating piece of cinema history—a high-budget gamble that tried to bridge the gap between classic literature and modern blockbuster tech. It’s a beautiful, flawed, and colorful trip down a very specific yellow brick road.