If you want to understand how the modern world actually works, you don't look at a textbook. You look at Singapore. Specifically, you look at the late Lee Kuan Yew. He wasn't just a politician. He was a ruthless pragmatist who turned a swampy, resource-poor island into a global powerhouse in a single generation. One Mans View of the World—the title of his final major work—is less of a memoir and more of a cold, hard autopsy of geopolitics. It’s blunt. It’s controversial. Honestly, it’s a bit terrifying because of how much he got right before he passed away in 2015.
He didn't care about "should." He cared about "is."
While Western leaders were busy talking about the inevitable spread of liberal democracy, Lee was sitting in his office looking at birth rates, ethnic tensions, and the raw pursuit of power. He saw the world as a series of competing systems where only the efficient survive. It’s a perspective that makes people uncomfortable because it ignores the warm, fuzzy ideals we like to tell ourselves at dinner parties. But if you look at the headlines in 2026, his fingerprints are everywhere.
The China Problem: It’s Not What You Think
Lee Kuan Yew knew China better than almost any Western observer. Why? Because he shared a cultural shorthand with their leadership while maintaining the distance of a sovereign head of state. In his view, China isn't trying to become a "responsible stakeholder" in a Western-led world. They want to be China. They want to be the biggest player at the table because, for most of human history, they were.
He famously noted that the sheer scale of China's displacement of the world balance is so large that the world has to find a new balance. It’s not just another player. It’s the biggest player in the history of man.
Western analysts often trip over themselves trying to predict a democratic revolution in Beijing. Lee thought that was nonsense. He argued that the Chinese people, having survived the chaos of the Cultural Revolution and centuries of dynastic collapse, prioritize order above all else. To them, a strong central government isn't an imposition; it’s a survival mechanism. If the Communist Party provides stability and growth, the "mandate of heaven" holds.
But he wasn't a blind cheerleader. He saw the cracks. The demographic collapse—a result of the one-child policy—was something he flagged as a potential death knell for their long-term ambition. You can't be a global hegemon if your population is shrinking and aging faster than you can automate your economy.
👉 See also: Why Trump's West Point Speech Still Matters Years Later
Why America Wins (For Now)
It’s easy to find critics of the United States. Lee was one of them, especially when it came to what he saw as America’s "social decay"—drugs, crime, and an obsession with individual rights over the health of the community. Yet, despite his frequent lecturing of US State Department officials, he remained a staunch believer in American supremacy.
Why? One word: Talent.
America has this weird, almost magical ability to suck the best brains out of every other country. Whether it’s a brilliant coder from Bangalore or a surgeon from Lagos, they want to go to Palo Alto or Houston. Lee knew that as long as the US stayed open to the world's "striver" class, it would be impossible to beat. China can draw from a pool of 1.4 billion people, sure. But America draws from a pool of 8 billion. That’s a massive mathematical advantage.
He also respected the American "can-do" spirit. He saw a resilience in the US economy that Europe lacked. Europe, in his eyes, was a beautiful museum. A place with great food and history, but one that had lost its competitive edge due to an over-extended welfare state and a lack of labor flexibility. He basically predicted the stagnation we see in the Eurozone today decades ago.
The Hard Truth About Democracy
This is where people usually get mad at Lee Kuan Yew. He didn't believe democracy was the "end of history."
He argued that for a country to thrive, it first needs discipline more than democracy. The "one man, one vote" system, he felt, often led to politicians promising free stuff to get elected, which eventually bankrupts the state. You see this everywhere now. Populism isn't a bug in the system; in Lee’s view, it’s a feature of late-stage democracy where the voters stop being stakeholders and start being consumers.
✨ Don't miss: Johnny Somali AI Deepfake: What Really Happened in South Korea
Singapore’s success was built on a different model: meritocracy.
If you’re the smartest person in the room, you get the job. It doesn't matter who your dad is. This hyper-competitiveness created a city-state that functions like a high-end Swiss watch. But it comes at a cost. There’s a lack of "soul" or "creativity" that critics often point to. Lee’s response? You can’t eat soul. You can eat a GDP that grows at 7% a year.
The Geography of Fate
One of the most profound takeaways from One Mans View of the World is his insistence that geography is destiny. You cannot change your neighbors. Singapore is a tiny Chinese-majority island in the middle of a Malay-Muslim sea (Indonesia and Malaysia). Every policy Lee enacted—from mandatory military service to linguistic neutrality—was a response to that geographic reality.
- Survival is the only metric. If a policy doesn't contribute to national survival, it's discarded.
- No one owes you a living. Small nations, in particular, must make themselves "relevant" to the world, or they will be swallowed.
- The world is not a fair place. It is a balance of power. If you don't have power, you better have a very good friend who does.
Real-World Evidence: The 2026 Reality Check
Look at the Middle East. Look at the fracturing of the global trade system. Lee Kuan Yew predicted that as the US became more energy-independent, it would care less about policing the world’s shipping lanes. We’re seeing that play out in real-time. The "Pax Americana" is fraying, and in the vacuum, regional powers are asserting themselves exactly how he said they would.
Even his views on climate change were pragmatic. He didn't talk about it in terms of "saving the planet" as an abstract moral goal. He talked about it in terms of air conditioning and rising sea levels. Singapore is already spending billions on polders and sea walls. He knew that humans don't change their behavior until the water is at their doorstep.
The Actionable Takeaway for the Individual
So, what do we do with this cold-blooded worldview? If you’re trying to navigate your career or your investments in this era, Lee’s philosophy offers a few solid anchors:
🔗 Read more: Sweden School Shooting 2025: What Really Happened at Campus Risbergska
Invest in "Relevance"
In a globalized economy, you are either a commodity or a "relevant" asset. If your skills can be replaced by a cheaper worker in another country or an AI, you have no leverage. Lee’s Singapore succeeded because it became the most efficient "node" in the global network. You have to do the same for yourself. Be the person who solves the problems no one else can.
Watch the Demographics
Don't ignore the numbers. Countries with shrinking populations will eventually face a massive debt crisis. If you’re looking at where to move or where to put your money, look at where the young, hungry people are. Demographics are slow-moving trains, but they never miss their destination.
Meritocracy is Your Best Friend
In an unstable world, people look for competence. Systems that favor "who you know" eventually collapse under the weight of their own stupidity. Position yourself in industries and companies that prioritize results over optics.
Lee Kuan Yew’s view of the world wasn't pretty. It wasn't always "kind" in the way we want modern leaders to be. But it was honest. In a world increasingly filled with noise and performative outrage, his brand of brutal realism is a refreshing, if chilling, tonic.
The most important lesson? The world doesn't care about your feelings. It cares about your utility. If you can make yourself useful, you’ll survive. If you can make yourself indispensable, you’ll thrive. Everything else is just talk.
To truly apply this, start by auditing your own "geopolitics." Who are your neighbors (your network)? What is your primary resource (your unique skill)? And most importantly, what is your plan for when the "balance of power" in your industry shifts? Because it will. It always does.