You’ve seen them. Those grainy, sepia-toned snapshots of women in pointy hats, maybe dancing around a fire or staring vacantly into a 19th-century lens. They pop up every October on Pinterest and Instagram, usually captioned with something about "the old ways" or "ancestral magic." But honestly? Most of those old pictures of witches aren't what they seem.
The history of the "witch" in photography is a messy, beautiful, and sometimes deceptive tangle of theater, early feminism, and pure Victorian pranksterism. People have always loved a good scare. Long before Photoshop, people were using double exposure and stage makeup to create "evidence" of the supernatural. It’s kinda fascinating how we project our modern ideas of Wicca or folk magic onto images that were originally intended as postcards or vaudeville advertisements.
The Victorian Obsession with the Occult
Photography was born right when Spiritualism was taking over the world. We’re talking about the mid-to-late 1800s. While the Salem Witch Trials were long over, the cultural memory remained, and the Victorians were obsessed with death. And ghosts. And, naturally, witches.
William H. Mumler is a name you should know. He’s the guy who basically "invented" spirit photography in the 1860s. While he focused more on ghosts, he paved the way for the visual language of the supernatural. When you see old pictures of witches from this era, you’re often looking at "spirit photography" techniques. They’d use a long shutter speed or a double-layered glass plate to make a woman look translucent. It wasn't about being a "real" witch; it was about the thrill of the "unexplained."
The "Witch" as a Fashion Statement
By the late 1800s and early 1900s, the image of the witch shifted. It became a costume. The "Pointy Hat" we all recognize? That didn't really become the standard "witch look" in photos until the late Victorian era. Before that, witches in art usually just looked like poor, elderly women in regular clothes.
If you find a photo from 1910 of a woman in a tall black hat, she’s likely headed to a masquerade ball. Masquerades were massive. People took their costumes seriously. They’d go to professional studios to document their outfits. So, that "witch" you see is probably Mabel from accounting, very proud of her silk cape and the broom she borrowed from the kitchen. It’s less "Hecate" and more "Halloween party."
🔗 Read more: God Willing and the Creek Don't Rise: The True Story Behind the Phrase Most People Get Wrong
Real Cunning Folk vs. The Camera
Now, were there "real" witches being photographed? Sort of. In the 19th century, people didn't usually call themselves witches because that was still a one-way ticket to being an outcast. They were "Cunning Folk," "Healers," or "Root Doctors."
Take the case of Biddy Early in Ireland. She died in 1874. There are very few verified images of people like her because, frankly, if you were a healer in a rural village, you didn't have the money or the desire to sit for a formal portrait. Most old pictures of witches that claim to be "authentic folk practitioners" are actually ethnographic photos taken by scholars like Margaret Murray.
Murray is a controversial figure. In the 1920s, she published The Witch-Cult in Western Europe. She basically argued that witchcraft was a surviving ancient pagan religion. Most modern historians, like Ronald Hutton (author of The Triumph of the Moon), have thoroughly debunked her specific theories. But her books featured photos and illustrations that defined how we "see" witches today. She’d find a photo of a woman in a traditional folk costume and label it as "ritual attire."
The Brocken Specter and Mid-Century Paganism
As we move into the 1940s and 50s, the pictures change. This is the era of Gerald Gardner. Gardner is the guy credited with bringing Wicca into the public eye. For the first time, people were willingly posing for old pictures of witches as a statement of identity.
These photos are different. They aren't spooky studio portraits. They’re candid. They’re grainy shots taken in the woods of Bricket Wood, England. You see people in robes (or nothing at all—skyclad, as they called it) standing around stone altars. These are the first truly "authentic" photos of people practicing what they called witchcraft, even if it was a modern reimagining of older traditions.
💡 You might also like: Kiko Japanese Restaurant Plantation: Why This Local Spot Still Wins the Sushi Game
Identifying the Fakes
If you’re a collector or just a fan of the aesthetic, you have to be careful. The market for vintage occult photos is flooded with "fauxtos."
- Check the hands: In many "creepy" old photos circulating online today, the hands look slightly off. This is a tell-tale sign of AI generation, even when it’s filtered to look like an old tin-type.
- The "Witch of Scrapfaggot Green": There’s a famous photo of a supposed witch’s grave being disturbed by a bulldozer in 1944. It’s real history, but the "ghostly" figures often edited into those shots are modern additions.
- The Clothing: If the "witch" is wearing a costume that looks like it’s from a 1990s movie, but the photo is black and white... well, do the math.
The Silent Film Influence
We can't talk about these images without mentioning Häxan (1922). This Danish-Swedish silent film is basically a documentary-style horror movie about the history of witchcraft. If you see a high-quality, terrifyingly realistic "old" photo of a witch with incredible makeup and prosthetic noses, there is a 90% chance it is a production still from Häxan.
The director, Benjamin Christensen, used real historical records (like the Malleus Maleficarum) to recreate scenes of the Witches' Sabbath. These images are so powerful that they are still used today in textbooks and articles as if they were real historical evidence. They aren't. They’re just really good cinema. But they shaped the "hags" we see in our nightmares.
Why Do We Keep Looking?
There’s something about a woman staring back at you from 1890, holding a black cat, that hits differently. It’s about power. For a long time, the "witch" was the only archetype of a woman who lived outside the control of men, the church, and the state.
When we look at old pictures of witches, we’re often looking for a connection to a rebellious past. Whether the woman in the photo was a real practitioner of magic, a theater actress, or just someone playing dress-up, the image carries weight. It represents a fear of the unknown and a fascination with the "other."
📖 Related: Green Emerald Day Massage: Why Your Body Actually Needs This Specific Therapy
How to Verify and Collect Antique Witch Photos
If you want to find actual, historical images without getting scammed by modern reprints or AI-generated fakes, you need to know where to look.
- Check the Medium: Is it a Daguerreotype (on metal), a Carte de Visite (small card), or a Cabinet Card? Real 19th-century photos have specific physical properties. If it’s a glossy 8x10, it’s a reprint.
- Search Institutional Archives: The Wellcome Collection and the Museum of Witchcraft and Magic in Boscastle, Cornwall, have the real deal. They have digitized thousands of images that are verified.
- Context is King: A photo of a woman in 1880 labeled "The Witch of [Town Name]" was usually a nickname given to a local healer or, sadly, a woman struggling with mental health or poverty. These aren't "spooky" photos; they’re tragic historical documents.
- Look for the "Spirit" Marks: If you see white streaks or "ectoplasm" in the photo, search for the photographer's mark. Many photographers in the 1890s specialized in these "trick" photos for fun.
The true history of old pictures of witches isn't found in a single "authentic" source. It’s a mosaic. It’s a mix of early special effects, theatrical performances, genuine religious expression, and social ostracization. By understanding the difference between a movie still from 1922 and a spiritualist's double exposure from 1870, you get a much clearer picture of how we’ve spent the last 150 years trying to capture "magic" on film.
Next time you see a "witch" in a vintage photo, look at her eyes. Is she performing for a camera, or is she just living her life in a world that didn't have a place for her? Usually, the truth is somewhere in between.
Actionable Next Steps:
- Visit Digital Archives: Start your research at the Museum of Witchcraft and Magic online database. It is the most comprehensive collection of actual ritual objects and photos in existence.
- Verify Before Sharing: Use a reverse image search (like Google Lens) on any "creepy" vintage photo you find. It will often lead you back to a film's IMDB page or a modern artist's portfolio.
- Read Primary Sources: Pick up a copy of The Discoverie of Witchcraft (1584) to see the woodcuts that inspired the photos of the 19th century. Understanding the art helps you understand the photography.