Everyone remembers the first time they finished Of Mice and Men by John Steinbeck. You’re sitting there, staring at the final page, wondering how a book that’s barely 100 pages long managed to wreck your entire week. It’s a brutal ending. It’s messy. It’s honest. Steinbeck didn’t write a feel-good story about friendship; he wrote a tragedy about the death of the American Dream in a dusty corner of California.
George and Lennie. They’re basically the archetype for every "odd couple" in literature now. You’ve got George, small and sharp, and Lennie, a giant of a man with the mind of a child. They’re running. Always running. When we meet them by the Salinas River, they’re fleeing a mess in Weed, California, headed toward a ranch near Soledad. They have this dream—this repetitive, rhythmic mantra about "living off the fatta the lan’" and tending rabbits. It’s a beautiful lie.
Honestly, it’s the simplicity that gets you. Steinbeck was a master of the "play-novelette" style. He wrote this specifically so it could be easily adapted for the stage. That’s why the dialogue is so punchy and the setting feels so contained. There are no wasted words.
The Real History Behind the Ranch
Steinbeck wasn't just guessing what it was like to be a bindlestiff. He lived it. In 1936, he was commissioned by the San Francisco News to write a series of articles called "The Harvest Gypsies." He spent time in the labor camps. He saw the "Hoovervilles." He watched men lose their dignity for the sake of a buck and a half a day.
When you read Of Mice and Men by John Steinbeck, you’re reading a semi-autographical account of the Great Depression's underbelly. The characters aren't just symbols; they’re composites of people he actually met while working as a hand on a ranch.
- The Salinas Valley: This was Steinbeck’s home turf. He knew the smell of the eucalyptus and the way the sun hit the Gabilan Mountains.
- The Migrant Experience: Most men traveled alone. Loneliness is the primary antagonist of the book, more so than Curley or his wife.
- The 1930s Economy: A job meant survival. Losing a job meant starvation. This is why the stakes in the novel feel so life-and-death—because they were.
Steinbeck once told an interviewer that Lennie was based on a real person he worked with. The real "Lennie" didn't kill a girl, but he did kill a ranch foreman because he was upset. Steinbeck watched it happen. It’s chilling when you realize the violence in the book isn't just for dramatic effect. It’s a reflection of a very violent, desperate time.
👉 See also: Kate Moss Family Guy: What Most People Get Wrong About That Cutaway
Why We Still Get Curley’s Wife Wrong
We need to talk about Curley’s wife. For decades, students were taught she was the "villain" or a "temptress." That’s a pretty lazy take. If you actually look at the text, she’s the most isolated person on that ranch. She doesn't even have a name. Steinbeck denied her a name to show she was viewed as property—first by her father, then by Curley.
She’s a girl with "sausage curls" who wanted to be in the movies. She’s stuck in a house with a man she hates, on a ranch where no one will talk to her because they’re scared of her husband. When she wanders into the bunkhouse, she isn't looking for trouble; she's looking for a human connection. She’s just as much a dreamer as George and Lennie, which makes her death in the barn even more tragic. It’s the moment the dream officially dies for everyone.
The Symbolism of the Puppy and the Candy’s Dog
You can’t ignore the dogs. Candy’s old sheepdog is a mirror for Candy himself. Once you’re no longer useful on the ranch, you’re discarded. Carlson’s insistence on shooting the dog "right in the back of the head" is a brutal foreshadowing of Lennie’s fate.
Then there's the puppy. Lennie kills it because he doesn't know his own strength. It’s the bridge between him killing mice and him killing a human being. It shows that in Steinbeck’s world, innocence and strength are a deadly combination. Lennie is "innocent" in the sense that he lacks malice, but he’s dangerous because he exists in a world that has no place for his limitations.
The Controversy and the Bans
It’s kind of wild that Of Mice and Men by John Steinbeck is still one of the most frequently challenged books in American schools. According to the American Library Association, it’s constantly under fire.
✨ Don't miss: Blink-182 Mark Hoppus: What Most People Get Wrong About His 2026 Comeback
Why?
People cite the "vulgarity." They point to the racial slurs used toward Crooks, the stable hand. They hate the ending—the idea of a mercy killing (euthanasia). But removing the book because it contains the ugly language of the 1930s misses the point entirely. The book isn't endorsing those views; it’s exposing them. Crooks’ monologue about how a man goes crazy if he doesn't have someone to talk to is one of the most poignant critiques of American racism ever written. It shows how isolation is used as a tool of oppression.
The Ending: Was It Really a Mercy Killing?
The climax by the river is probably the most debated ending in high school English classes. George kills Lennie. He does it while telling him about the rabbits, using Carlson’s Luger.
Is George a murderer?
Steinbeck argues that George is performing an act of profound love. The alternative was letting a lynch mob led by Curley get to Lennie. They would have made it slow and painful. George gave him a peaceful exit. But it also destroys George. By killing Lennie, George kills the part of himself that believed in the dream. He becomes just another "stiff" sitting in a bar, spending his money on whiskey because there's nothing left to save for.
🔗 Read more: Why Grand Funk’s Bad Time is Secretly the Best Pop Song of the 1970s
It’s a bleak realization. The "dream" was never real. It was just a story they told each other to keep from jumping off a bridge.
Key Insights for Modern Readers
If you’re revisiting this book or reading it for the first time, keep these things in mind to get the most out of it:
- Watch the light. Steinbeck uses light and shadow to signal when something bad is coming. Notice how the barn is described right before the climax.
- Listen to the rhythm. The way Lennie speaks is repetitive for a reason. It’s like a prayer.
- Look at the minor characters. Slim is the only one who truly understands the gravity of what George did at the end. He’s the "prince of the ranch," the moral center.
- Consider the title. It comes from Robert Burns’ poem: "The best laid schemes o' mice an' men / Gang aft agley [go often awry]." It tells you the ending before you even open the cover.
Practical Next Steps for Further Exploration:
- Read "The Harvest Gypsies": To see the real-life inspiration for the ranch hands, find Steinbeck's 1936 articles. They provide the sociological backbone to the fiction.
- Watch the 1992 Film: Starring Gary Sinise and John Malkovich. It’s widely considered the most faithful adaptation and captures the atmosphere perfectly.
- Visit the National Steinbeck Center: If you're ever in Salinas, California, this museum offers incredible context on his writing process and the local history.
- Analyze the "Hands" Motif: Re-read the book and count how many times "hands" are mentioned—Curley’s glove, Lennie’s paws, the ranch "hands." It’s the central metaphor for labor and agency.
The power of Of Mice and Men by John Steinbeck isn't in its plot twists. It's in its empathy. It asks us to look at the people the world considers "disposable"—the old, the disabled, the poor—and see their humanity. Even when the world has no room for their dreams.