You probably read it in high school. Most people did. You remember the rabbits, the bunkhouse, and that ending—the one that feels like a physical punch to the gut no matter how many times you’ve heard it coming. John Steinbeck’s Of Mice and Men book isn’t just some dusty relic from 1937 that teachers use to torture teenagers. It’s actually a pretty brutal, lean, and honest look at what happens when the world just doesn't care about your plans.
Steinbeck didn't write this to be a flowery masterpiece. He wrote it as a "play-novelette." He wanted something that could be read by a regular person but also performed on a stage without changing a word. That’s why the book is so short. It’s barely 30,000 words. You can finish it in a sitting, but the weight of it stays with you for weeks. It’s about George Milton and Lennie Small, two displaced migrant ranch workers during the Great Depression, chasing a dream that was basically rigged against them from the start.
The Real History Behind the Bunkhouse
A lot of people think Steinbeck just sat in a room and imagined the struggle. He didn’t. In the mid-1930s, Steinbeck actually worked alongside these guys. He was a "bindle stiff" himself for a while. He knew the smell of the unwashed clothes and the sound of the horses in the barn at night. He based Lennie on a real person he worked with who ended up in an asylum after killing a ranch foreman with a pitchfork. That’s why the book feels so gritty. It’s not a fairy tale. It’s reportage wrapped in a story.
The setting is Soledad, California. Fun fact: "Soledad" literally translates to "solitude" or "loneliness." Steinbeck wasn't being subtle there. Every character in the Of Mice and Men book is profoundly, painfully alone. Candy is old and missing a hand. Crooks is isolated by his race. Curley’s wife is trapped in a marriage with a man she hates. George has Lennie, sure, but he’s still essentially alone in his responsibility.
Why Lennie and George’s Relationship Is So Complicated
George is short, sharp, and impatient. Lennie is a "huge man, shapeless of face, with large, pale eyes." He has an intellectual disability that Steinbeck never names, mostly because the vocabulary for it didn't really exist in 1937 the way it does now. They have this repetitive, rhythmic way of talking about their "stake"—the little piece of land where they’re gonna "live off the fatta the lan’."
🔗 Read more: Shamea Morton and the Real Housewives of Atlanta: What Really Happened to Her Peach
It sounds sweet, right? Like a brotherhood. But if you look closer, it’s darker. George is constantly venting his frustration, telling Lennie how much easier his life would be if he were alone. He could go to a "cat-house," eat wherever he wanted, and keep his money. Yet, he stays. Why? Because in the world of the Great Depression, having someone—anyone—who gives a damn if you’re alive is a luxury. Most of the men on these ranches are "the loneliest guys in the world." George and Lennie are the exception, and that's what makes the ending so devastating.
The Symbolism of the Soft Things
Lennie loves soft things. Mice. Puppies. Velvet. Hair. It’s his primary way of interacting with a world that is otherwise too hard and too fast for him. But Lennie doesn't know his own strength. He "pets" things to death.
This isn't just a plot device; it’s a huge foreshadowing tool. When Lennie kills the mouse in the first chapter, it’s a warning. When he kills the puppy later, it’s the point of no return. Steinbeck is showing us that innocence, when combined with raw, uncontrolled power, is dangerous. Lennie isn't "evil." He’s just a force of nature that doesn't fit into a civilized world.
Curley’s Wife: The Most Misunderstood Character
For decades, people treated Curley’s wife as a villain or a "tart." Even the characters in the book call her names. But modern readers and scholars—like those at the National Steinbeck Center—have pointed out how tragic she really is. She doesn't even have a name. Think about that. She’s defined entirely by her husband, a man who wears a glove full of Vaseline to keep his hand soft for her, yet treats her like a possession.
💡 You might also like: Who is Really in the Enola Holmes 2 Cast? A Look at the Faces Behind the Mystery
She had dreams of being in the "movies." She thought she was a "natural." When she talks to Lennie in the barn, she’s just looking for a human connection. She’s bored and lonely. Her death is a freak accident, the result of two lonely people trying to find a moment of peace. Lennie isn't trying to hurt her; he's trying to make her stop screaming because he’s terrified of getting in trouble. It’s a mess of good intentions and horrible timing.
The Controversy and the Bans
Believe it or not, the Of Mice and Men book is one of the most frequently challenged books in American libraries. According to the American Library Association, it’s constantly under fire.
- People hate the profanity (it’s pretty mild by today's standards, honestly).
- They object to the "euthanasia" at the end.
- Some find the depiction of Crooks and the use of racial slurs offensive.
But here’s the thing: Steinbeck wasn't endorsing these views. He was reflecting the reality of 1930s California. If he had made the ranch a polite, inclusive paradise, he would have been lying. The book is uncomfortable because the history it represents was uncomfortable. Crooks, the Black stable hand, is forced to live in a shed because of Jim Crow-era mentalities. His bitterness is a rational response to a world that won't let him sleep in the bunkhouse.
That Ending: Mercy or Murder?
When George tells Lennie to look across the river and imagine the farm one last time, he’s doing the hardest thing a friend can do. He knows the lynch mob led by Curley is coming. He knows that if they catch Lennie, it’ll be a slow, violent death.
📖 Related: Priyanka Chopra Latest Movies: Why Her 2026 Slate Is Riskier Than You Think
By using Carlson’s Luger to shoot Lennie in the back of the head, George is choosing a "merciful" end. It mirrors the death of Candy’s old dog earlier in the book. Candy regretted not shooting his dog himself; George ensures he doesn't have that same regret with Lennie. It’s the ultimate act of love, wrapped in the ultimate act of violence. It’s messy. It’s complicated. It’s why we still talk about it.
Lessons We Can Actually Use
So, what do we take away from this? It’s not just a sad story. It’s a lens for looking at our own world.
First, the "American Dream" isn't a guarantee. Sometimes, you work your fingers to the bone and you still end up with nothing. That’s a hard truth, but it’s one Steinbeck wanted us to face.
Second, the importance of empathy for the "outcasts." Whether it’s Lennie, Crooks, or Candy, Steinbeck focuses on the people who are usually pushed to the margins. He’s asking us to look at them. To really see them.
What to do next if you want to master this book:
- Watch the 1992 film: Gary Sinise and John Malkovich absolutely nail the roles. It’s one of the few adaptations that actually keeps the spirit of the prose alive.
- Read "The Harvest Gypsies": This is a series of articles Steinbeck wrote for the San Francisco News. It’s the non-fiction foundation for his novels and gives you the raw facts about the migrant worker crisis.
- Visit the National Steinbeck Center: If you're ever in Salinas, California, go there. It’s an incredible deep dive into how his upbringing in the Salinas Valley shaped every word he wrote.
- Compare it to "The Grapes of Wrath": If Of Mice and Men is the "short, sharp shock," then Grapes of Wrath is the epic saga. Reading them back-to-back shows you the full range of Steinbeck's obsession with the working class.
The Of Mice and Men book doesn't offer easy answers. It doesn't have a happy ending. But it does offer a profound sense of what it means to be human in a world that is often anything but.