It feels like a lifetime ago. On a humid Friday in June 2015, the landscape of American law shifted under our feet. When the Supreme Court handed down its decision in Obergefell v. Hodges, the immediate reaction was explosive. Rainbow lights hit the White House. People cried on the courthouse steps. It was, quite literally, a landmark. But if you think that was the end of the story for the Supreme Court and gay marriage, you’re missing about half the picture.
The law is rarely a "happily ever after" situation.
Honestly, the 5-4 ruling wasn't just about who could get a marriage license at the local clerk's office. It was a massive philosophical collision between two different visions of the Constitution. Justice Anthony Kennedy, writing for the majority, argued that the right to marry is a fundamental part of individual liberty. He linked the Due Process Clause and the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment into this sort of unified theory of dignity. On the other side? Scalia, Roberts, Thomas, and Alito were basically saying, "Hold on, this isn't in the text."
The Legal Logic That Changed Everything
The court didn't just wake up one day and decide to change the rules. It was a slow burn. Before Obergefell, we had United States v. Windsor in 2013, which struck down the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA). That was the case where Edith Windsor sued because the government wouldn't recognize her marriage to her late wife for estate tax purposes. She won. That win set the stage.
When Obergefell arrived, it consolidated four different cases from Ohio, Michigan, Kentucky, and Tennessee. The plaintiffs weren't just activists; they were real people. Jim Obergefell wanted his name on his husband John Arthur’s death certificate. He wanted that recognition from the state that their relationship existed and mattered. The Court eventually agreed, stating that the right to marry is a "keystone of our social order" and that there is no lawful basis for a state to deny it to same-sex couples.
But here is the thing: the dissenters were incredibly loud. Chief Justice John Roberts wrote a dissent that was unusually sharp. He told proponents of same-sex marriage to celebrate their victory but warned that the Constitution had nothing to do with it. That friction—between "living Constitution" advocates and "originalists"—didn't go away. It just moved to a different neighborhood.
💡 You might also like: Blanket Primary Explained: Why This Voting System Is So Controversial
Why People Are Worried About the Supreme Court and Gay Marriage Now
If you've been following the news lately, you've probably heard about Dobbs v. Jackson. That's the 2022 case that overturned Roe v. Wade. Why does a case about abortion matter for marriage? Because of a concurring opinion by Justice Clarence Thomas.
Thomas didn't mince words. He explicitly suggested that the Court should reconsider other "substantive due process" precedents. He specifically named Griswold (contraception), Lawrence (same-sex intimacy), and, you guessed it, Obergefell.
This sent a shockwave through the country. For the first time in years, the legal stability of the Supreme Court and gay marriage seemed precarious to many. It felt like the ground was shifting again. While Justice Alito’s majority opinion in Dobbs tried to reassure people that abortion was a "unique" issue because it involves potential life, not everyone bought it. Critics argue that if the legal foundation for privacy and liberty is weakened for one right, it’s weakened for all of them.
The Respect for Marriage Act: A Safety Net?
Because of that fear, Congress actually stepped in. They passed the Respect for Marriage Act (RFMA) in late 2022. President Biden signed it with a fair bit of ceremony.
It’s a clever piece of legislation, but it’s not a 1:1 replacement for Obergefell. Basically, the RFMA does two things:
📖 Related: Asiana Flight 214: What Really Happened During the South Korean Air Crash in San Francisco
- It requires the federal government to recognize a marriage if it was valid in the state where it was performed.
- It requires states to recognize valid out-of-state marriages for the purposes of "full faith and credit."
So, if the Supreme Court ever did overturn Obergefell, a state like Georgia could theoretically stop issuing new same-sex marriage licenses. However, because of the RFMA, Georgia would still have to recognize a marriage license issued in New York. It’s a patchwork solution. It prevents a total "reset" to the pre-2015 era, but it doesn't guarantee the right to marry in every single zip code if the Court changes its mind.
Conflicts With Religious Liberty
We can't talk about this without mentioning the "cake" of it all. Or the websites. The intersection of LGBTQ+ rights and the First Amendment is the new frontline.
Cases like Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission and more recently 303 Creative LLC v. Elenis show where the Court is heading. In 303 Creative, the Court ruled 6-3 that a Christian graphic designer couldn't be forced by state law to create wedding websites for same-sex couples. Justice Gorsuch argued this was a matter of "compelled speech."
This is where the nuance gets really sticky. The Court isn't necessarily saying gay marriage is wrong; they are saying that the government cannot force individuals to use their creative talents to express a message they disagree with. To some, this is a vital protection of religious freedom. To others, it’s a "license to discriminate" that carves out holes in civil rights laws.
What Most People Get Wrong
One big misconception is that the Supreme Court "made" gay marriage legal everywhere forever and it can never be touched. That’s just not how our system works. The Court interprets the law, but a future Court can interpret it differently. Look at Plessy v. Ferguson and Brown v. Board of Education. Precedent is powerful, but it isn't indestructible.
👉 See also: 2024 Presidential Election Map Live: What Most People Get Wrong
Another mistake? Thinking that public opinion doesn't matter to the Justices. While they are unelected and serve for life, the Court generally tries to avoid becoming completely unmoored from societal norms. Today, a vast majority of Americans—including a growing number of Republicans—support same-sex marriage. Taking away a right that millions of people have already exercised is a lot messier than preventing that right from existing in the first place. There are tax implications, inheritance issues, and child custody knots that would be a nightmare to untangle.
Practical Realities for Couples
If you are in a same-sex marriage or planning one, the current legal environment means you need to be a little more proactive than the average couple. You can't just rely on the "vibe" of the law.
- Documentation is everything. Keep physical and digital copies of your marriage certificate. If you travel to a state with hostile laws, having that proof is your first line of defense.
- Update your estate planning. Don't just assume the state will handle things. Wills, powers of attorney, and healthcare directives are essential. They provide a layer of protection that exists independent of how a clerk feels about your marriage.
- Second-parent adoption. Even if both names are on the birth certificate, some legal experts still recommend formal adoption proceedings to ensure parental rights are recognized nationwide, regardless of future Court rulings.
The conversation around the Supreme Court and gay marriage is far from over. It’s moving into the realm of "conscience clauses" and "religious exemptions." We are likely to see more cases involving foster care agencies, small business owners, and even healthcare providers.
The 2015 ruling was a massive milestone, but it wasn't the finish line. It was the start of a new, more complicated chapter in American civil rights.
Moving Forward
To stay protected and informed, you should prioritize these three actions:
- Consult a Family Law Attorney: Specifically, one who specializes in LGBTQ+ issues in your specific state. Laws vary wildly regarding parental rights and "de facto" parenthood.
- Monitor State Legislation: The real action is often in state houses. Watch for bills that attempt to define "marriage" or "religious freedom" in ways that could impact local benefits.
- Formalize Your Legacy: Ensure your beneficiary designations on 401(k)s, life insurance, and bank accounts are up to date and explicitly name your spouse. This bypasses much of the probate process where legal challenges often arise.
The law is a living thing. It breathes, it moves, and sometimes, it retreats. Staying informed isn't just about politics—it's about protecting your home.