Nudity in The Substance: Why Coralie Fargeat’s Graphic Choices Actually Matter

Body horror is meant to be uncomfortable. That’s the point, right? But when Coralie Fargeat’s The Substance hit theaters, the conversation shifted almost instantly from the gore to the sheer amount of skin on screen. We aren’t talking about the "tasteful" nudity you see in a prestige Oscar drama. This is something else entirely. It’s aggressive. It’s vulnerable. Honestly, it’s kinda exhausting to watch, which is exactly why it works.

Demi Moore and Margaret Qualley didn't just sign up for a movie; they signed up for a total exposure of the female form under a literal and metaphorical microscope. If you’ve seen it, you know. The camera doesn’t just look; it stares. It lingers on pores, stretch marks, and the smooth, uncanny valley perfection of a "younger version."

The Reality of Nudity in The Substance

Let’s get one thing straight: the nudity in The Substance isn't there to turn you on. If you’re looking for a sexy thriller, you’re in the wrong theater. Fargeat uses the bodies of Moore (Elisabeth Sparkle) and Qualley (Sue) as battlegrounds.

The plot revolves around a black-market serum that allows you to birthed a "better" version of yourself. This process is violent. It’s messy. When Sue emerges from Elisabeth’s back—a scene that is already a classic in the body horror canon—she is naked, slick with fluids, and shivering. It’s a birth. You don't give birth in a cocktail dress.

Fargeat is playing with the "Male Gaze" by turning it into a "Monster Gaze." By over-saturating the film with nudity, she makes the audience hyper-aware of their own eyes. You start to feel like the gross TV producer played by Dennis Quaid. You’re forced to look at these women the way the industry looks at them—as assets with expiration dates.

Demi Moore’s Bravado

It’s impossible to talk about this film without acknowledging what Demi Moore did. At 61, Moore is delivering the most vulnerable performance of her career. There’s a specific scene where Elisabeth is getting ready for a date. She looks in the mirror. She sees a flaw. She tries to cover it. She sees another. She scrubs her makeup off.

She’s naked in front of that mirror for a long time.

💡 You might also like: How to Watch The Wolf and the Lion Without Getting Lost in the Wild

It isn't about vanity. It’s about the soul-crushing realization that no matter how much you nip, tuck, or "substantiate," time is coming for you. Moore has spoken openly in interviews, specifically at the Cannes Film Festival, about the "vulnerability" required. She described the experience as a "liberating" way to face the industry's obsession with youth head-on. She’s not playing a character who happens to be naked; she’s playing a character whose primary trauma is her body.

Why Sue’s Nudity Feels Different

Then there’s Margaret Qualley. As Sue, she represents the "perfect" version. The camera treats her differently. It uses wide angles and bright, pop-art colors. The nudity here is performative. Sue is constantly on display, whether she’s in a leotard that leaves nothing to the imagination or completely bare during the "maintenance" segments of the procedure.

The contrast is the point.

When Sue is naked, it’s a celebration of a temporary peak. When Elisabeth is naked, it’s a eulogy. This juxtaposition is what makes the nudity in The Substance so vital to the narrative. If they were clothed, the stakes wouldn't feel so visceral. You need to see the skin to understand the cost of the trade.

The Influence of Cronenberg and Beyond

Fargeat isn't inventing the wheel here, but she’s certainly spinning it faster. You can see the DNA of David Cronenberg’s The Fly or Dead Ringers. In those films, the body is a traitor. In The Substance, the body is a commodity.

Critics have pointed out that the film leans into "extreme cinema." This isn't just a Hollywood flick; it’s a French-produced assault on the senses. The French have a long history of using graphic imagery to push psychological boundaries—think Martyrs or Raw. Fargeat takes that "New French Extremity" and coats it in a neon, Los Angeles gloss.

📖 Related: Is Lincoln Lawyer Coming Back? Mickey Haller's Next Move Explained

The Controversy of the "Gaze"

Is it exploitative? That’s the big question. Some viewers walked out of screenings claiming the film becomes the very thing it’s satirizing. They argue that by showing so much of Qualley and Moore, Fargeat is just giving the audience the "eye candy" the film claims to critique.

But there’s a counter-argument that feels more accurate to the director’s intent.

By making the nudity so clinical and eventually so grotesque, Fargeat kills the libido of the film. By the third act, when the "monstrous feminine" takes over, the nudity is no longer about beauty. It’s about the horror of flesh. You aren't looking at a woman anymore; you’re looking at a biological disaster. It’s a bold move to use nudity to make the audience feel repulsed by the concept of the "perfect body."

Behind the Scenes: The Practical Effects

Most of the "nudity" in the later stages of the film involves incredible prosthetic work. Pierre-Olivier Persin, the lead makeup effects designer, had to blend the actresses' real bodies with horrific, distorted limbs and sagging skin.

• The "birth" sequence took weeks to prep.
• Prosthetics were applied over several hours to ensure the transitions looked seamless.
• The blood—gallons of it—was a custom formula designed to look "hyper-real" under the bright studio lights.

This technical detail matters because it shows that the nudity was a choreographed element of the production design. It wasn't an afterthought or a way to get "clicks." It was as carefully planned as the script itself.

The Takeaway for Viewers

If you’re going into The Substance, prepare for a lack of boundaries. The film is a 140-minute scream about the impossibility of being a woman in the public eye.

👉 See also: Tim Dillon: I'm Your Mother Explained (Simply)

The nudity is the language the film uses to speak. It tells us that we are all just meat, bones, and a desperate desire to be seen. It’s ugly, it’s beautiful, and it’s deeply, deeply weird.

For those looking to engage with the film on a deeper level, pay attention to the lighting during the nude scenes. Notice how Elisabeth is often cast in harsh, unforgiving shadows, while Sue is bathed in a soft, artificial glow. That’s the story right there. No dialogue needed.

To truly understand the impact of these creative choices, watch Moore’s earlier work like Striptease or G.I. Jane. You’ll see a career-long exploration of the female body as a tool of power, but The Substance is the first time she’s allowed that body to be seen as a source of horror. It’s a radical shift that defines the current era of "elevated" horror cinema.

Next time you watch a film that features significant nudity, ask yourself if it’s there to build a bridge between the character and the audience, or if it’s just there to fill a frame. In the case of The Substance, the bridge is made of raw nerves and a lot of courage.

Actionable Insights for Film Enthusiasts:

1. Contextualize the Director: Look into Coralie Fargeat’s previous film, Revenge (2017). It deals with similar themes of the female body under duress and will give you a better framework for her visual style in The Substance.
2. Analyze the "Male Gaze": Read Laura Mulvey's foundational essay Visual Pleasure and Narrative Cinema. It provides the vocabulary needed to understand why Fargeat’s camera angles are so intentional and provocative.
3. Support Practical Effects: Follow artists like Pierre-Olivier Persin on social media. Understanding the labor behind the prosthetics helps demystify the graphic nature of the film and highlights the artistry over the shock value.
4. Engage with Post-Screening Discussions: This is a "water cooler" movie. Discussing the discomfort with others often reveals how different people internalize the film’s message about aging and self-hatred.