It used to be a standard Tuesday on a film set. An actor would show up, find out a scene had been "tweaked" to include nudity, and basically just have to deal with it. No advocates. No written consent forms. Just a robe and a lot of nerves. Honestly, the way nude scenes in movies were handled for decades was kind of a mess.
Things are different now.
If you’ve watched a prestige drama on HBO or a gritty indie flick lately, you’ve probably noticed the nudity feels... intentional? It’s rarely just there for the sake of a cheap thrill anymore. We are living through a massive shift in how the industry treats the human body. This isn't just about being "PC" or following new HR rules. It’s a fundamental change in the craft of filmmaking.
The Rise of the Intimacy Coordinator
For a long time, stunt coordinators were mandatory for every punch thrown on screen. But for a sex scene? You were on your own. That changed around 2018 when HBO became the first major studio to make intimacy coordinators a requirement for all their shows.
Alicia Rodis is often credited as the trailblazer here. She started on the set of The Deuce, and suddenly, there was a professional in the room whose entire job was to choreograph intimacy. They aren't there to be the "modesty police." Far from it. They’re there to make sure the actors feel safe so they can actually perform. Think about it. It’s hard to act "in love" when you’re worried about a wardrobe malfunction or a co-worker crossing a boundary.
These coordinators use tools that sound like they belong in a craft store. We’re talking about "modesty garments," skin-safe adhesives, and even barriers like yoga mats or "pancakes" (small cushions) placed between actors. It sounds unromantic because it is. It’s a technical maneuver, just like a car chase.
Why Authentic Nudity Still Matters for the Story
Some people argue that we don't need nude scenes in movies anymore. They say it’s a relic of the 90s erotic thriller era. But that’s a bit of a simplification.
Take a look at a film like Poor Things (2023). Emma Stone’s performance involved significant nudity, but it wasn't about titillation. It was about her character, Bella Baxter, discovering her own agency and physical existence. Director Yorgos Lanthimos and Stone worked closely with intimacy coordinators to ensure the nudity served the narrative of "sexual awakening" rather than the "male gaze."
💡 You might also like: Why Love Island Season 7 Episode 23 Still Feels Like a Fever Dream
When nudity is stripped of its storytelling purpose, it feels jarring. You know the feeling. You’re watching a movie with your parents and suddenly there’s a completely unnecessary shower scene. It’s awkward because it doesn’t belong. But when it’s used to show vulnerability—like in Moonlight or Manchester by the Sea—it hits different. It’s about the raw, unprotected human state.
The Contractual Side of Being Naked
Everything is on paper now. This is a huge win for actors who used to be pressured into things mid-scene. Modern SAG-AFTRA contracts are incredibly specific. They include riders that detail exactly what can be shown.
- The "Nudity Rider" defines the "top and bottom" limits.
- It specifies whether "digital nudity" (CGI) can be used later.
- It often grants the actor the right to review the footage before the final cut.
Directors like Christopher Nolan or Greta Gerwig have to respect these boundaries. If an actor signs a contract saying "no frontal," and a director tries to push for it on the day, the intimacy coordinator steps in. It’s a professional barrier that didn’t exist ten years ago. It protects the production from lawsuits, sure, but more importantly, it protects the person.
The "Post-Me-Too" Landscape and the Male Gaze
We have to talk about the "male gaze." It’s a term coined by film theorist Laura Mulvey in the 70s. Basically, it’s the idea that the camera views the world (and women’s bodies) from the perspective of a heterosexual man. For decades, nude scenes in movies were almost exclusively female-centric.
Lately, there's been a push for "equal opportunity nudity." Shows like Euphoria or Normal People have been noted for showing male nudity just as frequently as female nudity. It balances the power dynamic. It makes the intimacy feel more like a shared experience between characters rather than a spectacle for the audience to consume.
But it's not all perfect. Some actors, like Penn Badgley, have recently spoken out about wanting to do fewer intimate scenes altogether. He famously requested that his role in You move away from those scenes out of respect for his real-life marriage and his own comfort level. This highlights a new trend: the right to not be nude is becoming just as respected as the right to do it safely.
Deepfakes and the Digital Threat
Technology is the new frontier. And it’s kind of terrifying.
📖 Related: When Was Kai Cenat Born? What You Didn't Know About His Early Life
Actors now have to worry about their likeness being used in AI-generated content. This was a major sticking point in the 2023 Hollywood strikes. If an actor does a nude scene, what’s stopping a studio from using their body data to create new scenes they never agreed to?
Legal experts like Mary Anne Franks have been vocal about the need for "image rights" that protect against non-consensual deepfakes. Studios are now having to include specific clauses promising not to use an actor’s "digital twin" for sexual or nude content without explicit, separate consent. This is a battle that is still being fought in courtrooms and union halls.
The Evolution of "Body Positivity" on Screen
We're also seeing a wider range of bodies. The "Hollywood Standard" of being 2% body fat with perfect skin is slowly—very slowly—starting to crack.
Movies like Good Luck to You, Leo Grande featuring Emma Thompson were groundbreaking. Thompson plays a retired teacher who hires a sex worker, and the film ends with a shot of her standing naked in front of a mirror. No filters. No Spanx. Just a woman in her 60s looking at her body. It was radical because we almost never see "normal" aging bodies in nude scenes in movies.
When we only see "perfect" bodies, it creates a distorted reality. Showing skin that has folds, scars, or age spots isn't "brave"—it's just realistic. It grounds the movie in the real world.
How to Tell if a Scene is "Good" or "Bad" Artistically
Next time you're watching a film, ask yourself a few questions. Does the nudity tell me something about the character's emotional state? Is the camera lingering on body parts in a way that feels like a music video, or is it capturing a moment of connection?
- The Vulnerability Factor: If a character is nude because they are at their lowest point or most honest moment, it usually works.
- The Narrative Push: If you could cut the nudity and the scene still makes total sense, it might be gratuitous.
- The Power Dynamic: Who is in control of the scene? If one person is clothed and the other isn't, there's a power play happening. Is that intentional?
Directors like Sofia Coppola or Barry Jenkins are masters of this. They use skin as a texture, not a target. They understand that a bare shoulder can sometimes say more than a full-frontal shot if the lighting and the context are right.
👉 See also: Anjelica Huston in The Addams Family: What You Didn't Know About Morticia
What’s Next for Hollywood?
We are moving toward a "closed set" by default. In the past, dozens of crew members—electricians, craft services, random assistants—might be hanging around during a sensitive scene. Now, the set is cleared. Only essential personnel are allowed. Some directors even use remote cameras so they can be in a different room entirely, giving the actors space to breathe.
The goal isn't to get rid of nudity. Art has always explored the human form, from the statue of David to the latest indie darling. The goal is to remove the "creep factor" and replace it with professional standards.
Practical Steps for Navigating the New Standards
If you're a filmmaker, an aspiring actor, or just a curious cinephile, here is how you can stay informed and ethical about this topic:
- Read the SAG-AFTRA Intimacy Standards: These are public documents. They outline exactly what "best practices" look like in 2026. It’s a great way to see how the "sausage is made."
- Follow the Work of Intimacy Professionals Association (IPA): They provide training and resources for coordinators. Their site often has deep dives into the psychology of on-set safety.
- Support "Ethical" Productions: Pay attention to how actors talk about their directors in interviews. When an actor like Florence Pugh or Margot Robbie praises the "safety" of a set, it usually means those protocols were followed to the letter.
- Advocate for Digital Protections: Stay aware of legislation regarding AI and "biometric data." These laws will dictate the future of how human bodies are used (and potentially abused) in digital media.
The conversation around nude scenes in movies has evolved from "how much can we show?" to "how can we show this with respect?" It's a better way to make art. It's a better way to treat people. And honestly, it usually leads to a much better movie.
When actors feel safe, they take risks. When they take risks, we get performances that actually stick with us. That’s the whole point of cinema anyway.
Key Resources for Further Reading:
- The SAG-AFTRA Intimacy Coordinator Resource Page
- The British Film Institute (BFI) Principles on Prevention of Harassment
- The "Image Rights" advocacy work of the Cyber Civil Rights Initiative