Nude male in films: Why the big screen is finally losing its shirt (and everything else)

Nude male in films: Why the big screen is finally losing its shirt (and everything else)

You’ve probably noticed it. Maybe while scrolling through a streaming service or sitting in a dark theater during a prestige drama. Things are changing. For decades, the "male gaze" meant that Hollywood was perfectly comfortable showing one specific type of nudity, while the nude male in films remained a rare, often shocking outlier. It was either a punchline in a Will Ferrell comedy or a blink-and-you-miss-it moment in an indie flick. But honestly, that’s just not the case anymore. We are living through a massive shift in how the male body is presented, deconstructed, and, frankly, looked at.

It’s about time.

Hollywood has a weird history with this. Think back to the Hays Code era. Back then, you couldn't even show a married couple sharing a bed, let alone a naked guy. Even as the 1970s "New Hollywood" era pushed boundaries with films like Midnight Cowboy or The Last Picture Show, there was still a massive disparity. Female nudity became a staple of R-rated cinema, but the male counterpart stayed tucked away. When it did happen—think Alan Bates and Oliver Reed wrestling in Women in Love (1969)—it was treated as a monumental, high-art provocation. It wasn't "normal." It was a Statement.

The "Full Frontal" taboo is cracking

Why does it feel like such a big deal when it happens? Because for a long time, it was.

In the 90s and early 2000s, seeing a nude male in films usually meant one of two things. It was either "brave" Oscar bait or a "gross-out" gag. You had Ewan McGregor in Trainspotting or The Pillow Book, who basically became the poster child for "actors who aren't afraid." On the other side, you had American Pie. There was no middle ground. There was no casualness to it.

📖 Related: Howie Mandel Cupcake Picture: What Really Happened With That Viral Post

But look at the landscape now.

Actors like Paul Mescal in Normal People (yes, TV, but the cinematic crossover is real) or Leo Woodall in The White Lotus have shifted the vibe. It’s less about the shock factor and more about intimacy. It’s about realism. If two people are having a life-altering emotional moment in a bedroom, it looks weird if one person is perfectly draped in a sheet like a Greek statue while the other is exposed. Audiences are calling out that artifice. They want the vulnerability to be symmetrical.

The power shift: Who is behind the camera?

A lot of this comes down to the "female gaze" and the rise of woman directors and cinematographers.

When a male director films a nude scene, there’s historically been a tendency to look away from the man. It’s almost a subconscious protection of the male ego or a lingering discomfort with the idea of men being objectified. However, creators like Emerald Fennell (Saltburn) or Charlotte Wells (Aftersun) aren't playing by those old, dusty rules. In Saltburn, Barry Keoghan’s nudity isn't just a detail; it’s a central part of the character’s reclamation of space. It’s haunting. It’s visceral. It’s also something we rarely saw in mainstream hits twenty years ago.

👉 See also: Austin & Ally Maddie Ziegler Episode: What Really Happened in Homework & Hidden Talents


The "Body Horror" and "Vulnerability" exceptions

It’s not all about romance, though. Sometimes, the nude male in films is used to show total, absolute breakdown.

  1. Viggo Mortensen in Eastern Promises (2007): That steam room fight. It’s probably the most famous example of male nudity used to strip away the "action hero" veneer. He’s not powerful because he’s wearing tactical gear; he’s powerful because he’s completely exposed and still winning. It’s brutal.
  2. Steve McQueen’s Shame (2011): Michael Fassbender’s performance here used nudity to show addiction and hollowed-out sadness. It wasn't sexy. It was actually kind of devastating to watch.
  3. The Comedy Crouch: We still have the "accidental" nudity in movies like Forgetting Sarah Marshall. Jason Segel famously fought to keep his full-frontal scene in that movie because he felt it was the ultimate expression of a guy being dumped and left with nothing. He was right. It worked because it was awkward.

The industry’s new safety net: Intimacy Coordinators

You can’t talk about this topic without mentioning the people who actually make it happen on set. Ten years ago, an "intimacy coordinator" wasn't a standard job title. Actors were often just told to "strip down and go for it," which led to a lot of therapy bills and genuinely uncomfortable working environments.

Today, the presence of professionals like Ita O'Brien or Alicia Rodis has changed the game. They treat a nude scene like a stunt. It’s choreographed. It’s consented to in writing, down to the inch of skin shown. This has actually made actors—men included—much more willing to go there. When you know exactly where the camera is and that your boundaries are respected, you can actually act instead of just worrying about your modesty.

It’s basically the "demystification" of the process. And strangely, by making it more clinical behind the scenes, the results on screen have become more human.

✨ Don't miss: Kiss My Eyes and Lay Me to Sleep: The Dark Folklore of a Viral Lullaby

Why does this matter for the audience?

Honestly? It’s about equity.

If cinema is supposed to be a mirror of the human experience, then that mirror should show everything. We’ve spent a century seeing women’s bodies used as landscape, as decoration, or as a shorthand for "edgy" filmmaking. When the nude male in films becomes just another part of the visual language—rather than a "Gasp!" moment—it levels the playing field. It suggests that the male body is also capable of being fragile, objectified, or simply present.

It also challenges the rigid standards of what a "movie body" looks like. While we still see a lot of shredded Marvel-style physiques, indie cinema is increasingly showing men who look like... well, men. Softness. Hair. Imperfections. This is where the real progress is.

A quick reality check

We aren't quite at total parity yet. Data from various "nudity trackers" (yes, those exist) still show that female performers are asked to disrobe significantly more often than their male counterparts. There’s also the "contractual" hurdle. A-list male stars often have "no-nudity" clauses baked into their deals that are much stricter than what their female co-stars can negotiate. It’s a power dynamic thing. It’s changing, but it’s slow.


Actionable insights for the modern viewer

If you're interested in how this evolution is playing out, you don't have to look far. But you do have to look past the blockbusters.

  • Watch the "New Wave" of Indie Directors: Seek out films by directors like Sean Baker (Red Rocket) or the Safdie Brothers. They use the male form in ways that feel gritty and unpolished.
  • Pay Attention to the Credits: Look for the Intimacy Coordinator credit. See if you notice a difference in how the scenes are shot compared to movies from the early 2000s. You’ll usually find that modern scenes feel less "exploitative" and more "narrative."
  • Challenge Your Own Bias: Ask yourself why a nude male in films might still feel "shocking" while female nudity often feels "expected." That internal reaction says a lot about the media we've consumed for decades.
  • Follow the Conversation on Ratings: The MPAA (and other boards) have historically been harsher on male nudity than female nudity. Watch how ratings for films like Passages (2023) spark debates about what "adult content" actually means in a modern context.

The era of the "shameful" or "joke" male body is ending. What’s replacing it is a more honest, varied, and let’s be real, interesting version of masculinity. Whether it’s for art, for a laugh, or for a moment of genuine connection, the screen is getting a lot more crowded, and a lot more honest.