So, imagine a world where men are basically a dying breed because women have figured out how to reproduce without them. That's the premise of the 2015 Canadian mockumentary No Men Beyond This Point. It’s weird. It’s awkward. Honestly, it’s one of the most underrated pieces of speculative fiction to come out of the indie circuit in the last decade. Director Mark Sawers took a concept that could have been a preachy nightmare and turned it into a dry, hilarious, and strangely poignant look at what happens when half the population just... stops being necessary.
Most people haven't seen it. If they have, they probably found it on a late-night streaming binge. But the film has a lot to say about gender roles and social inertia.
What No Men Beyond This Point gets right about "The End of Men"
The movie starts in 1953. This is the "divergence point." In this alternate history, women suddenly start giving birth to only girls through asexual reproduction—virgin births, basically. No sex required. No men required. By the time the movie catches up to the "present day," men are an endangered species living in specialized reserves.
It's a mockumentary, so it uses that The Office style of "talking head" interviews. The protagonist, Andrew Myers, is played by Patrick Gilmore. He’s 37 years old and he’s the youngest man on Earth. That is a heavy burden for a guy who basically just wants to be a quiet housekeeper.
What makes No Men Beyond This Point work is the tone. It isn't an angry feminist manifesto. It isn't a "men are great" rebuttal. It’s just... quiet. The world is cleaner. It’s more polite. There’s a lot less war. But there is also a weird lack of spark. The film asks a very uncomfortable question: if we solved all the world’s problems by removing one gender, would we actually be happy, or just bored?
✨ Don't miss: Archie Bunker's Place Season 1: Why the All in the Family Spin-off Was Weirder Than You Remember
The science (sorta) and the social satire
Let's talk about the biology. In the film, this process is called "parthenogenesis." In the real world, this actually happens in some sharks, komodo dragons, and snakes. It’s not a sci-fi invention. Of course, in humans, it’s biologically impossible—at least for now. But by grounding the "no men beyond this point" premise in a real biological term, Sawers makes the social commentary sting a bit more.
The movie shows us a society where "manhood" has become a relic. There are "Man Sanctuaries." These aren't prisons, exactly. They're more like retirement homes where guys can play golf, argue about nothing, and look at old calendars. It’s pathetic and hilarious.
Why the movie didn't go viral (but should have)
- It’s too dry. Canadian humor is often self-deprecating and subtle.
- The title. People see "No Men Beyond This Point" and assume it's a political attack. It’s not. It’s a character study about a guy who just wants to belong in a world that has moved on.
- Distribution. Indie films from Vancouver don't exactly get Marvel-sized marketing budgets.
The cinematography is purposely bland. It looks like a government documentary. This makes the absurdity of seeing a world without men feel "normal." You see rows of women in beige clothes living very orderly lives. It’s a utopia that feels a little bit like a waiting room at a dentist's office.
Gender dynamics and the "Andrew" problem
Andrew is the heart of the story. He works for a family of women. He’s a "houseman." He’s kind, efficient, and completely invisible. This flips the traditional 1950s gender dynamic on its head. Usually, it's the woman who is the "invisible" domestic worker. By putting a man in that role in a world where he is literally the last of his kind, the movie forces you to look at how we value domestic labor.
🔗 Read more: Anne Hathaway in The Dark Knight Rises: What Most People Get Wrong
The conflict arises when Andrew starts to develop feelings for one of the women he works for, Tara. But in this world, "romantic love" is seen as a weird, archaic disease. Why would you need a partner when you can just clone yourself and live in a peaceful sisterhood?
Real-world parallels and the "Man-Cession"
When this movie came out, people were talking a lot about "The End of Men," a book by Hanna Rosin. There was this cultural anxiety that men were falling behind in education and the workforce. No Men Beyond This Point took that anxiety to its literal, absurd conclusion.
Interestingly, the film doesn't paint the women as villains. They aren't "man-haters." They just found a more efficient way to exist. That’s what’s actually scary about the movie. It’s not a violent revolution; it’s a slow, polite fading away.
How to watch it and what to look for
If you decide to track this down, don't expect an action movie. Don't expect a romantic comedy either. It’s a satire. Pay attention to the background details:
💡 You might also like: America's Got Talent Transformation: Why the Show Looks So Different in 2026
- The posters in the background of the "Man Sanctuaries."
- The way the news anchors talk about the "men problem."
- The specific year—1953—was the peak of the patriarchal nuclear family. Choosing that as the year men started becoming obsolete is a very deliberate move.
The film won some awards at the Vancouver International Film Festival for a reason. It’s smart. It’s brave enough to be quiet.
Why we need more movies like this
Most sci-fi today is about explosions or AI takeovers. No Men Beyond This Point is about sociology. It uses a "What If" scenario to examine the "What Is." We live in a world where gender roles are changing faster than ever. This movie provides a safe, funny space to look at the extremes of those changes.
The ending—no spoilers—is surprisingly sweet. It suggests that even in a world that has "outgrown" the need for two genders, there is something about human connection that can't be replaced by efficiency or biological "purity."
Actionable Insights for Fans of Speculative Satire
If the themes in No Men Beyond This Point resonate with you, there are a few ways to dive deeper into this specific sub-genre of "social sci-fi":
- Watch the "Counter-Programming": Check out Children of Men. It’s the dark, gritty mirror image of this film. Instead of only women being born, no babies are born at all. Seeing the two side-by-side gives you a fascinating look at how we view the future of humanity.
- Research Parthenogenesis: If you're a science nerd, look into the work of Dr. Helen Pilcher. She writes about the "de-extinction" of species and the weird ways nature handles reproduction. It makes the film's premise feel a lot less like "magic" and more like a "biological glitch."
- Explore Canadian Mockumentaries: Canada has a weirdly strong grip on this genre. From Trailer Park Boys to the works of Don McKellar, there is a specific brand of dry humor that thrives in the Great White North.
- Host a "Gender in Film" Night: This movie is a perfect conversation starter. Pair it with something like Mad Max: Fury Road or The Handmaid’s Tale. You'll see three completely different visions of how gender power dynamics can collapse or evolve.
The best way to enjoy No Men Beyond This Point is to go in with an open mind. Don't look for a political fight. Look for the small, human moments in a world that has decided humans are optional. It’s a weird ride, but it’s one worth taking.