You’ve probably been there. It’s midnight, you’re four rounds deep into an NFL draft 2024 simulator, and you just traded a 2025 second-rounder to move up for a guy who wasn’t even invited to the Combine. We all do it.
Honestly, mock draft season is a sickness. It's that weird time of year where every fan thinks they’re basically Howie Roseman. But here’s the thing: most people use these tools like a video game rather than a projection of reality. If you’re just clicking "Accept" on every trade the AI throws your way, you’re not simulating the draft; you’re just playing a very expensive version of "What If."
The 2024 class was legendary for its quarterbacks—Caleb Williams, Jayden Daniels, Drake Maye. Everyone wanted a piece. But the way a simulator handles those picks compared to how the actual NFL handles them? That's where things get messy.
The Problem With "Acceptable" Trades
The biggest trap in any NFL draft 2024 simulator is the trade logic. Most fans use the Pro Football Network (PFN) or Pro Football Focus (PFF) tools. They’re great, don't get me wrong. But PFF’s "acceptance chance" slider is famously forgiving.
I’ve seen mocks where people trade back five times in the first round and end up with twelve picks in the top 100. In the real world, that doesn't happen. Teams don't just hand over premium capital because a slider says there's a 30% chance they might. If you want a realistic experience, you’ve gotta stick to something like the Rich Hill trade value chart. If the points don't match, don't force the trade.
Basically, if the trade feels like a steal, it probably is. And in a real draft, "steals" are rare. Usually, you’re overpaying to move up for a QB. Look at what happened in the actual 2024 draft—the Vikings had to give up significant capital just to move up one spot for J.J. McCarthy. Most simulators would let you do that for a bag of chips.
Why Player Rankings Get Wonky
Every simulator is only as good as its "Big Board." This is the data that tells the AI who to pick and when.
The issue is that "Consensus Big Boards" usually lag behind actual NFL scouting. You might see a player like Kool-Aid McKinstry ranked as a top-10 lock in February, but by April, the NFL has him as a late-first or early-second rounder. If your NFL draft 2024 simulator hasn't updated its rankings in three weeks, your mock is already obsolete.
- PFF: Uses their own grading system. Great for analytics, but sometimes ignores "NFL traits" like raw speed or arm talent.
- NFL Mock Draft Database: Aggregates hundreds of mocks. This is usually the most "realistic" because it smooths out the weird outliers.
- Draft Network: Often has more scout-heavy rankings, which can be a reality check for the stat-heads.
I remember doing a sim where Joe Alt fell to the 20s. In what universe? The guy is a mountain. The AI sometimes values "positional need" so heavily that it lets blue-chip prospects slide past teams that would never pass on them in a million years.
The Quarterback Tax
In the 2024 cycle, the "QB Tax" was at an all-time high. Six quarterbacks went in the first 12 picks. Most simulators at the time struggled to predict that. They kept trying to slot Brock Bowers or Dallas Turner into the top 10 because they were "better players" on paper.
But the NFL is a quarterback league. If you're running an NFL draft 2024 simulator and Bo Nix is sitting there in the second round, your sim is broken. Teams reach for QBs. It’s what they do. To make your mocks better, you have to manually "force" some of these reaches or at least acknowledge that the AI is being too logical.
Stop Drafting for "Today"
One thing I see constantly is fans drafting for their team's immediate hole at left guard. Sure, it's a need. But NFL GMs draft for 2025 and 2026, too.
If a team has a veteran starter on the last year of his deal, they’re looking at his replacement now. A lot of the NFL draft 2024 simulator tools allow you to see contract status or "team needs," but they don't always weigh future vacancies correctly.
Think about the Raiders. Everyone thought they’d go O-line or DB. They took Brock Bowers. Why? Because he was the best player available and they didn't care about their current TE room. Most fans would have skipped Bowers in a sim because "it wasn't a need."
How to Actually Get a 5-Star Grade
Most of these tools give you a letter grade at the end. Getting an "A+" is actually pretty easy if you game the system. Just pick whoever is at the top of their board regardless of fit.
But if you want a mock that actually looks like something Adam Schefter would tweet, you have to be disciplined.
- Turn the "Randomness" Up: Most sims have a slider for this. Crank it. Real drafts have "head-scratchers" (looking at you, Atlanta and Michael Penix Jr.).
- Limit Your Trades: Allow yourself one trade-up or one trade-down per draft. That's it. No more stockpiling 2027 picks.
- Check the RAS: Relative Athletic Score (RAS) is huge. If a guy has a 4.0 RAS, he’s probably not going in the first round, even if the simulator says he's a "Top 20" talent.
Your Next Steps for a Better Draft Experience
If you're still obsessing over the 2024 class or moving on to 2025, stop just clicking through the picks.
First, go to a site like Mock Draft Database and look at their "Expected Draft Position" (EDP) data. This tells you where a player is actually expected to go, not just where one analyst has them ranked.
Second, try running a "Full 7-Round" sim without making a single trade. It’s way harder than you think to build a roster when you can’t manipulate the board.
Finally, compare your results to the actual 2024 draft results. See where the AI was "wrong" and where you were "wrong." Usually, the truth lies somewhere in the middle. The goal isn't to be perfect—it's to understand the process.
💡 You might also like: Who Was the First Super Bowl Winner? The Green Bay Packers and the Game That Almost Wasn't
Go ahead and fire up your favorite NFL draft 2024 simulator right now, but this time, try to think like a GM who's afraid of getting fired, not a fan who's playing with house money.