When Donald Trump first announced the creation of the Space Force, the internet did what it does best: it lost its mind. Memes of Starship Troopers and jokes about "Galactic Walls" flooded every feed. But while late-night hosts were busy sharpening their punchlines, one of the most famous scientists on the planet did something unexpected. He didn't laugh.
Neil deGrasse Tyson on Trump is a topic that usually triggers a knee-jerk reaction from both sides of the political aisle. If you lean left, you might expect Tyson to be a relentless critic of a president who once called climate change a "hoax." If you lean right, you might view Tyson as just another member of the "coastal elite" looking to lecture the masses.
The reality? It's way more nuanced than a 280-character tweet.
The Space Force "Sanity" Check
Honestly, Tyson’s take on the Space Force is probably the best example of how he separates politics from policy. Back in 2018, when the idea of a sixth military branch was being mocked as a vanity project, Tyson went on the record with CBS News. He basically told everyone to calm down.
"Just because it came out of Trump’s mouth doesn’t automatically mean it’s a crazy idea," he said.
That's a bold thing to say in a hyper-polarized climate. Tyson’s logic was pretty straightforward: we already had a command structure for space, but it was buried under the Air Force. He argued that since our entire modern way of life—GPS, banking, power grids—relies on space assets, having a dedicated branch to protect them makes sense. He even pointed out that he had proposed a similar concept back in 2001 while serving on a commission for George W. Bush.
He didn't care about the branding. He cared about the mechanics.
💡 You might also like: Danny DeVito Wife Height: What Most People Get Wrong
The Businessman Hook
One of the more fascinating things about Tyson is how he thinks scientists should talk to politicians. He doesn't believe in "beating them over the head." Instead, he tries to find the "hook" that speaks to their specific worldview.
For Trump, that hook was money.
During several interviews, including a notable chat with TheWrap, Tyson explained his strategy for talking to a man like Trump. You don't lead with the beauty of a nebula. You lead with the "engines of the 21st-century economy."
Tyson’s theory was simple: Trump is a businessman. Businessmen like R&D because R&D leads to patents, and patents lead to profit. By framing NASA and scientific research as a way to ensure "America Inc." remains competitive against other nations, Tyson believed you could win over even the most skeptical administration.
Where the Gloves Came Off: Climate and Truth
Don't mistake his pragmatism for total agreement, though. Not even close. While Tyson was willing to give the nod to Space Force, he was scathing when it came to the administration’s handling of climate science and the Paris Agreement.
When the U.S. pulled out of the Paris Agreement in 2017, Tyson didn't hold back on Twitter. He warned that we were witnessing the "unraveling of an informed democracy." That's a heavy phrase for a guy who usually spends his time talking about the size of the sun.
📖 Related: Mara Wilson and Ben Shapiro: The Family Feud Most People Get Wrong
His beef wasn't just about the environment. It was about the very concept of "objective truth."
Tyson has often said that the "good thing about science is that it's true whether or not you believe in it." When the Trump administration began leaving key scientific advisor positions vacant—like the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy—Tyson saw it as a systemic failure. To him, a leader doesn't need to be a scientist. They just need to know when they don't know something and hire the smartest people to fill the gap.
The Crotch Tweet Incident
We have to talk about the 2016 tweet. You know the one.
Right after the election, Tyson tweeted that when he finally met Trump, he might "first grab his crotch" to get his attention before discussing science. It was a direct, satirical jab at the infamous Access Hollywood tape.
It went viral. It also got him a lot of heat.
Some saw it as a hilarious way to use the President-elect's own words against him. Others thought it was "beneath" a scientist of his stature. It was a rare moment where Tyson let his personal frustration with the political "theatre" spill over into a more aggressive form of satire. It showed that despite his academic's "analyze everything" mantra, he wasn't immune to the raw emotions of the 2016 cycle.
👉 See also: How Tall is Tim Curry? What Fans Often Get Wrong About the Legend's Height
Why This Matters in 2026
You might wonder why we're still talking about Neil deGrasse Tyson on Trump years later. It's because the "Tyson Method" is still the blueprint for how science survives in a political world.
He didn't retreat into an ivory tower. He didn't become a full-time activist. He stayed in the middle, trying to educate the "electorate" rather than just yelling at the person in the Oval Office.
Tyson’s perspective is that if the people are scientifically literate, they won't elect leaders who ignore the data. It's a bottom-up approach. It’s also a lot harder than just posting a snarky comment.
Practical Lessons from the "Tyson vs. Trump" Era
If you're trying to advocate for something—whether it's science, a business proposal, or a change in your local school board—there are a few actionable takeaways from how Tyson handled this:
- Separate the person from the idea. You can hate the source and still find merit in the suggestion (like the Space Force).
- Speak their language. If you’re talking to a CFO, talk about ROI. If you’re talking to a parent, talk about safety. Don't expect them to learn your jargon first.
- Defend the process, not just the result. Tyson didn't just fight for "Climate Change." He fought for the integrity of the scientific method and the need for advisors.
- Accept the "Feature, not a Bug" reality. Science updates its views when new data comes in. Politicians often see this as "flip-flopping." Education is the only way to bridge that gap.
Tyson remains one of the few figures who can walk the line between pop culture and hard physics. His interactions with the Trump era weren't about "winning" a political argument. They were about trying to keep the stars in the conversation, even when the ground below was shaking.
To stay informed on how these policies continue to shape our current space race, you should look into the latest NASA budget allocations for 2026 and the progress of the Artemis missions. Keeping an eye on the "Office of Science and Technology Policy" (OSTP) appointments is also a great way to see if the "Tyson Method" of advisory-led leadership is actually being followed by the current administration.