Let’s be real for a second. If you look at the list of nba mvp all time winners, you’re basically looking at the DNA of basketball history. It’s not just a list of names. It's a map of how the game changed from "big men standing near the rim" to "7-footers throwing no-look passes like they're Magic Johnson." But honestly? The stats on the back of the bubblegum cards don’t explain why some guys have five trophies and others—who were arguably just as dominant—only have one.
The MVP isn’t just about who is the "best." If it were, LeBron James probably would have won ten of them. Michael Jordan wouldn’t have "only" five. The award is about the narrative. It’s about the story the media wants to tell that year. It’s kinda messy, definitely controversial, and honestly, that’s why we love arguing about it at the bar.
The Mount Rushmore of NBA MVP All Time
When we talk about the absolute heavyweights, the conversation starts and ends with Kareem Abdul-Jabbar. The man has six. Six! He won them across two different decades and two different franchises (the Bucks and the Lakers). Most people forget that Kareem was so dominant in the 70s that the league felt almost broken. He won back-to-back MVPs twice.
Then you’ve got the tie for second place. Bill Russell and Michael Jordan both have five.
Russell’s wins are interesting because, back then, the players voted for the MVP. They didn't care that Wilt Chamberlain was averaging 50 points a game (literally, 50.4 in 1962). They cared that Russell was the heartbeat of a Celtics dynasty that wouldn't stop winning. Jordan, on the other hand, had to deal with "voter fatigue." You’ve probably heard that term. It’s basically when writers get bored of giving the trophy to the same guy. That’s how Karl Malone "stole" one in 1997, even though Jordan was... well, Jordan.
The Multi-Trophy Club
- Kareem Abdul-Jabbar: 6 wins
- Bill Russell: 5 wins
- Michael Jordan: 5 wins
- Wilt Chamberlain: 4 wins
- LeBron James: 4 wins
- Larry Bird: 3 wins (The only guy to win three in a row besides Russell and Wilt)
- Magic Johnson: 3 wins
- Nikola Jokic: 3 wins (and counting, honestly)
- Moses Malone: 3 wins
The Snubs That Still Make Fans Mad
You can't talk about the nba mvp all time rankings without talking about the "robberies."
📖 Related: NFL Football Teams in Order: Why Most Fans Get the Hierarchy Wrong
Take the 1961-62 season. This is the holy grail of NBA stats. Wilt Chamberlain averaged 50.4 points and 25.7 rebounds. Oscar Robertson averaged a triple-double for the entire season. Who won? Bill Russell. He averaged 18.9 points. Now, Russell was a defensive god, but can you imagine the Twitter meltdown if that happened today?
Then there’s 2006. Kobe Bryant was at the absolute peak of his powers, dragging a mediocre Lakers roster to the playoffs while averaging 35.4 points per game. He even dropped 81 in a single game that year. But the award went to Steve Nash. Nash was brilliant, sure, but he averaged 18.8 points. People still argue about that one in Lakers forums every single day.
And don't even get me started on 2011. Derrick Rose was the youngest MVP ever at age 22. He was electric. He was a human highlight reel. But analytically? LeBron James had a much better season in Miami. The "Decision" made LeBron the villain, and the MVP voters weren't ready to reward the bad guy yet. Narrative wins again.
How the "Value" has Changed Lately
The way we pick an MVP in 2026 is nothing like how they did it in 1970. Back in the day, if your team didn't win 50 games, you weren't winning MVP. Period.
That changed in 2017 with Russell Westbrook. He averaged a triple-double, and even though the Thunder were a 6th seed, the "statistical milestone" was too big to ignore. It opened the floodgates. Now, we look at things like PER (Player Efficiency Rating), Win Shares, and VORP (Value Over Replacement Player).
👉 See also: Why Your 1 Arm Pull Up Progression Isn't Working (And How to Fix It)
This shift is why Nikola Jokic has been able to dominate the award lately. He doesn't jump high. He's not fast. He looks like a guy who might own a very successful stable of horses (which he does). But his advanced metrics are essentially off the charts. He is the most efficient offensive engine the league has ever seen. When he's on the floor, the Nuggets are a juggernaut. When he sits, they look like a lottery team. That is the definition of "Value."
The International Takeover
It’s wild to look at the last few years. We went through a stretch where the MVP trophy didn't stay in America for half a decade.
- Giannis Antetokounmpo (Greece) - 2019, 2020
- Nikola Jokic (Serbia) - 2021, 2022, 2024
- Joel Embiid (Cameroon) - 2023
- Shai Gilgeous-Alexander (Canada) - 2025
The game is global now. The "best player in the world" isn't necessarily a kid from Akron or Chicago anymore. It's a kid from Sombor or Athens.
What Actually Goes Into a Winning Campaign?
If you’re a superstar and you want that trophy, you need three things.
First, the Stats. You need the "counting stats" (points, rebounds, assists) to be elite, but you also need the advanced numbers to back you up.
✨ Don't miss: El Salvador partido de hoy: Why La Selecta is at a Critical Turning Point
Second, the Team Record. Most of the time, you still need to be a top-3 seed. The voters like winners. They don't want to give the Michael Jordan Trophy to a guy on a .500 team unless he's doing something literally historic.
Third, the Narrative. This is the secret sauce. Are you the young up-and-comer? Are you the veteran getting his "lifetime achievement" award (looking at you, 2008 Kobe)? Are you the guy who stayed loyal to a small market? The media loves a story. If you can give them a "Why now?" reason to vote for you, you're halfway there.
Actionable Insights for Fans and Historians
If you're trying to settle a GOAT debate or just want to understand the nba mvp all time list better, here’s how to look at the data:
- Contextualize the Era: Don't compare Bill Russell's points to Michael Jordan's. The game was played at a different pace with different rules.
- Check the Games Played: The NBA recently added a 65-game minimum for awards. If you're looking at historical winners, notice how many played nearly all 82 games. Longevity in a single season matters.
- Look at the "Shares": On sites like Basketball-Reference, look for "MVP Award Shares." This tells you how close the races were. Sometimes a guy "lost" the MVP but only by a few points, meaning he was essentially just as valuable that year.
- Watch the "Triple-Double" Trap: Since Westbrook's 2017 win, we've become a bit desensitized to triple-doubles. Look at efficiency (True Shooting Percentage) to see who is actually helping their team win vs. who is just hunting stats.
The MVP award will always be a lightning rod for controversy. It's a subjective award in an objective world of statistics. But at the end of the day, that list of winners is a pretty accurate representation of the giants who built the league we watch today.
To get a deeper feel for the "value" of these legends, your next move should be to compare MVP wins against Finals MVP wins. It’s the ultimate litmus test to see who dominated the regular season and who took it to another level when the lights were brightest.