Hollywood is obsessed with crowns. Honestly, it’s a bit weird if you think about it too long. We live in a world that mostly abandoned absolute rule centuries ago, yet every time a studio announces a new biopic about a Tudor or a Romanov, we lose our collective minds. Why? It’s not just the fancy dresses. Movies about kings and queens tap into something primal—the messy, terrifying overlap between family therapy and global politics. When a king has a midlife crisis, people don't just get divorced; countries go to war.
The stakes are just higher.
If you look at the landscape of historical cinema, it’s basically a long list of people who were never told "no" suddenly realizing that their titles can't protect them from heartbreak or a sharp axe. From the silent era to the neon-soaked aesthetics of Sofia Coppola, the monarchy remains the ultimate playground for filmmakers.
The Problem with "Historical Accuracy"
Let’s get one thing straight: most of your favorite movies about kings and queens are lying to you. They have to. Real history is often too slow, too boring, or just plain confusing to fit into a two-hour narrative.
Take The Favourite (2018), directed by Yorgos Lanthimos. It’s brilliant. It’s also wildly stylized. While Queen Anne did have a very close, intense relationship with Sarah Churchill and Abigail Masham, the film’s hyper-modern dialogue and fisheye lens shots are there to capture the vibe of a decaying court rather than to act as a documentary. Historians like Tracy Borman have often pointed out that while the emotional beats of these films might ring true, the logistics—the clothes, the specific insults, the pacing—are usually tweaked for drama.
Then you have the "Old Hollywood" approach. Think The Lion in Winter (1968). Peter O'Toole and Katharine Hepburn are screaming at each other like they're in a modern New York apartment, but they’re playing Henry II and Eleanor of Aquitaine in 1183. It works because it treats royalty as people first and statues second.
Why the British Monarchy Always Wins the Box Office
It’s the Tudors. It’s always the Tudors.
💡 You might also like: Dark Reign Fantastic Four: Why This Weirdly Political Comic Still Holds Up
Seriously, if you look at the sheer volume of films and shows dedicated to Henry VIII or Elizabeth I, it outweighs almost every other dynasty combined. Elizabeth (1998) turned Cate Blanchett into a superstar by framing the "Virgin Queen" as a political survivor in a thriller, rather than a stiff historical figure.
But why them?
- The stakes are clear: get an heir or die.
- The costumes are iconic (the ruffs, the pearls, the lead makeup).
- The drama is built-in (beheadings are great for the third act).
But the trend is shifting. Audiences are starting to get "Tudor fatigue." We’re seeing a rise in stories from different cultures, like The Woman King (though she’s a warrior, not a traditional monarch, it plays in the same sandbox) or films focusing on the Qing Dynasty.
The Loneliness of the Crown
There’s a specific trope in movies about kings and queens that never fails: the "Gilded Cage."
Marie Antoinette (2006) is the poster child for this. People hated it when it came out because it used New Order songs and showed a pair of Converse sneakers in the background. But Sofia Coppola was making a point. Being a teen queen isn't about power; it's about being a piece of property that eats a lot of cake. It's lonely.
Contrast that with The King’s Speech (2010). Colin Firth plays George VI, a man who never wanted to be king but was forced into it because his brother chose love over the throne. The film isn't about war or law-making. It’s about a man with a stutter trying to find his voice. That’s the secret sauce. The best royal movies take these god-like figures and make them small. They make them relatable.
📖 Related: Cuatro estaciones en la Habana: Why this Noir Masterpiece is Still the Best Way to See Cuba
The Evolution of the Villain King
We used to love a "Great Man" story. Early cinema was full of noble kings leading charges into battle. Now? We want the mess.
We want to see the madness of George III. We want to see the paranoia of Richard III. We’ve moved away from hagiography—the practice of writing about people as if they were saints—and toward psychological deconstruction. Look at Spencer (2021). It’s basically a horror movie. Kristen Stewart’s Princess Diana isn't a royal; she’s a captive. It’s a claustrophobic, tense look at what happens when a human spirit is crushed by a system that demands silence.
Beyond the English Channel: World Royalty
If you only watch English-language movies about kings and queens, you’re missing out on the best stuff.
Akira Kurosawa’s Ran is essentially King Lear set in feudal Japan. It is arguably the greatest "king" movie ever made. The scale is massive. The colors are vivid. And the tragedy is bone-deep. It reminds us that the themes of power and betrayal are universal. It doesn't matter if you're in Windsor or Kyoto; the crown weighs the same.
Then there's The Last Emperor (1987). Bernardo Bertolucci got permission to film inside the Forbidden City. You can't fake that kind of scale. It follows Puyi from being a child-god to a gardener. It’s the ultimate "rise and fall" story, but with a tragic, quiet ending that most Hollywood biopics are too scared to try.
Does Accuracy Even Matter?
Honestly? Not as much as people think.
👉 See also: Cry Havoc: Why Jack Carr Just Changed the Reece-verse Forever
If you want the "truth," read a biography by someone like Antonia Fraser or Alison Weir. Movies are about truthiness. They are about how it felt to be there. When The King (2019) came out on Netflix, historians pointed out that the armor was slightly off and the Battle of Agincourt looked a bit too much like a mosh pit. But for the average viewer, seeing Timothée Chalamet deal with the crushing weight of leadership felt real. That’s the goal.
What to Look for Next
The genre is changing. We’re moving away from the "Great White King" narrative and looking at the shadows. We're seeing more stories about the people around the throne—the servants, the mistresses, the forgotten children.
If you want to get into this genre, don't just stick to the hits.
- Watch the "Stage to Screen" adaptations. Movies like A Man for All Seasons or The Lion in Winter have the best dialogue because they were plays first.
- Look for the "Anti-Biopic." Films like The Favourite or Marie Antoinette that break the rules of the genre.
- Check out international cinema. Explore the history of the Mughal Empire or the French Revolution from the French perspective.
How to Watch More Critically
Next time you sit down to watch a royal drama, ask yourself one question: Who is this movie trying to make me sympathize with? Is it the monarch? Is it the people they rule? Usually, these films are surprisingly conservative—they want us to feel bad for the person in the palace. But the most interesting ones are the ones that acknowledge the cost of that palace.
Actionable Insights for the History Buff:
- Fact-Check After, Not During: Don't ruin the movie by Googling dates in the theater. Enjoy the narrative, then dive into the Wikipedia rabbit hole once the credits roll. It makes the learning part more fun.
- Compare Different Versions: Watch three different movies about Elizabeth I (Cate Blanchett, Helen Mirren, and Margot Robbie). You'll see how each era interprets the same woman differently based on what was happening in the real world at the time.
- Follow the Money: Look at who funded the film. Sometimes, historical epics are co-sponsored by tourism boards or even modern governments, which can influence how "heroic" the ancestors look.
The fascination with movies about kings and queens isn't going anywhere. As long as there are people with too much power and not enough therapy, Hollywood will have stories to tell. We're just along for the ride, watching the crowns topple and the velvet tear, safe in our seats while the "gods" on screen lose their heads.
To truly understand the genre, start by identifying the era that interests you most—whether it's the sheer brutality of the Middle Ages or the stifling etiquette of the Victorian era—and look for films that focus on the personal cost of public power. This shift in perspective transforms a simple costume drama into a profound study of the human condition under extreme pressure.