It is big. Really big. You probably knew that already, but let's talk about the actual number for a second. When people ask about the height of mount everest in feet, they usually expect a single, solid answer they can memorize for a pub quiz.
Twenty-nine thousand and thirty-one point six nine feet.
That is the "official" number as of the most recent joint survey by Nepal and China. It sounds precise. It sounds final. But honestly? It’s kind of a moving target. The Earth is alive, and the Himalayas are basically a giant, slow-motion car crash between two tectonic plates that never actually stops happening.
The 29,031.69 foot reality
For decades, the world used 29,029 feet. That was the 1954 Indian survey number. It was the gold standard. Then, in 2020, surveyors from both sides of the border sat down and agreed on 29,031.69 feet (or 8,848.86 meters if you’re into the metric system).
✨ Don't miss: Fort Lauderdale Airport to New York: What Most Travelers Get Wrong About the North-South Shuffle
Why the change?
Tectonics. The Indian plate is still shoving itself under the Eurasian plate. This means the mountains are growing. But then you have earthquakes, like the massive 7.8 magnitude Gorkha quake in 2015, which actually caused parts of the range to drop. Imagine a giant piece of dough being stretched and squished simultaneously. That's Everest.
Does the snow count?
This is where things get controversial in the world of high-altitude surveying. Are you measuring the rock? Or the ice cap sitting on top of the rock?
China and Nepal argued about this for years. China originally wanted to stick to the "rock height," which is a few feet lower. Nepal insisted on the "snow height." Eventually, they compromised on the snow-capped peak because, let’s be real, if you’re standing on top of Everest, you’re standing on the snow. You aren't digging down to the limestone just to feel like you've reached the "true" summit.
How we actually calculate the height of mount everest in feet
Back in the 1850s, Andrew Waugh and his team at the Great Trigonometrical Survey didn't have GPS. They didn't have satellites. They had giant, heavy theodolites and a whole lot of math.
They were hundreds of miles away.
Because they weren't allowed into Nepal at the time, they had to sight the peak from the plains of India. They had to account for light refraction, which bends because of the air temperature. It’s wild that they got within 20 feet of the modern measurement using what was essentially a very fancy telescope and some trigonometry.
Nowadays, we use a mix of three things:
- GNSS (Global Navigation Satellite Systems): Surveyors actually carry a receiver to the summit. It’s heavy, the batteries hate the cold, and you have to leave it there for a while to get a solid lock on the satellites.
- Gravimeters: These measure the local strength of gravity. Gravity isn't the same everywhere on Earth, and it affects how "sea level" is calculated.
- Ground-penetrating radar: This is how they figure out exactly how thick that snow cap is. On Everest, the snow can be over 10 feet deep depending on the season.
Why the "Sea Level" part is a lie
We say Everest is 29,031 feet above sea level. But which sea? The ocean isn't flat. It bulges.
To get the height of mount everest in feet, scientists use a "geoid." Think of it as a hypothetical model of what the Earth’s surface would look like if the oceans covered the whole planet and were only affected by gravity and rotation. It’s a lumpy, potato-shaped invisible map.
If you changed the model of the geoid, the height of the mountain would "change" overnight without a single rock moving. It’s all about the baseline.
The death zone and the physical toll
When you are at 29,031 feet, you are in the "Death Zone."
There is only about a third of the oxygen available at sea level. Your body literally starts dying. Cells break down. Your brain can swell (HACE). Your lungs can fill with fluid (HAPE). Most people can't survive more than 24 to 48 hours at that altitude, even with bottled oxygen.
It’s not just the height; it’s the pressure. Or lack of it.
Is it actually the tallest?
Technically, no.
If you measure from the base to the peak, Mauna Kea in Hawaii wins. It starts on the ocean floor and rises over 33,000 feet. But since most of it is underwater, Everest keeps the crown for "highest altitude."
Then there’s Mount Chimborazo in Ecuador. Because the Earth bulges at the equator, the summit of Chimborazo is actually the point on Earth closest to the stars. It’s "higher" in space, even though its elevation above sea level is much lower than Everest's.
What the future looks like for the peak
Geologists expect the mountain to keep rising.
But it’s also getting warmer. The Khumbu Icefall is getting more dangerous as the glaciers melt and shift. We might see a day where the "snow height" drops significantly while the "rock height" continues to climb.
🔗 Read more: Finding Your Way: What the Map of Norfolk UK Doesn't Tell You
If you're planning on seeing it, or heaven forbid, climbing it, you need to understand that this isn't a static monument. It's a shifting, growing, shrinking pile of rock and ice that happens to touch the edge of the troposphere.
Actionable insights for your next steps
If you are a student, a traveler, or just someone who loves a good map, here is how to use this information:
- Check your sources: If a textbook or website still says 29,028 or 29,029 feet, it’s using data that is technically outdated by the 2020 joint survey standards.
- Understand the margin of error: Even with modern GPS, there is still a margin of error of a few inches. Never trust a "perfect" measurement in geology.
- Consider the season: If you are trekking to Base Camp (which sits at about 17,598 feet), remember that the visible "peak" you see looks different in winter versus monsoon season due to snow accumulation.
- Use the 2020 figure for official work: For any academic or professional geography project, 29,031.69 feet is the current internationally recognized figure.
The mountain doesn't care what we call it or how we measure it. It’s just going to keep sitting there, catching the jet stream and growing a few millimeters a year while we argue about the decimal points.