There is an old, somewhat cynical saying in Rome: "He who enters the conclave a pope, leaves it a cardinal." It’s basically the Vatican’s version of "don't count your chickens."
When the red-hatted princes of the Church finally lock themselves inside the Sistine Chapel, the world goes into a frenzy of speculation. We want a name. We want a clear winner. But the reality of who is most likely to be pope is rarely about who is topping the betting odds at William Hill or being discussed on CNN. Honestly, it’s a game of "theopolitics" that would make most secular politicians' heads spin.
The atmosphere in 2026 is tense. Pope Francis left behind a Church that is more global than ever, but also deeply fractured. Whether the next guy tries to finish what Francis started or hits the "undo" button is the billion-dollar question.
The "Safe Hands" and the Continuity Candidates
If the cardinals want someone who won’t rock the boat—someone who knows where the bodies are buried but has the diplomatic grace to keep things moving—they look to the Italians.
Cardinal Pietro Parolin is the name you’ll hear the most. As the Vatican’s Secretary of State, he’s basically the Prime Minister. He’s 70, which is "Vatican young," and he has spent decades navigating the world's most impossible diplomatic minefields, from secret deals with China to the war in Ukraine. He is the ultimate moderate. Conservatives like him because he’s predictable and respects tradition; progressives like him because he was Francis’s right hand for over a decade.
Then there’s Cardinal Matteo Zuppi. People call him the "bicycling cardinal" or a "street priest." He’s a guy who actually spends time with the poor and marginalized, much like Francis did in Buenos Aires. If the College of Cardinals wants "Francis 2.0" but with an Italian accent and perhaps a bit more administrative discipline, Zuppi is the guy.
But here’s the catch. Being the frontrunner is dangerous. When you’re the person to beat, everyone starts looking for reasons to beat you. Parolin has been mired in some financial scandals (like the London property mess) that weren't necessarily his fault but happened on his watch. That kind of baggage can be a dealbreaker when you need a two-thirds majority.
Breaking the Euro-Centric Mold
For the first time in history, fewer than half of the voting cardinals are European. That is a massive shift. The Church is exploding in Africa and Asia while it’s shrinking in the West. This makes the most likely to be pope list look very different than it did fifty years ago.
- Luis Antonio Tagle (Philippines): Often called the "Asian Francis." He’s incredibly charismatic, social media savvy, and represents the future of the Church in Asia. However, he’s seen as too close to Francis by some, which might turn off the "reform the reform" crowd.
- Fridolin Ambongo Besungu (Congo): He is a powerhouse. He recently made waves by leading the African bishops in a collective "no thanks" to the Vatican’s document on blessing same-sex couples. He’s a Capuchin friar, he’s tough, and he represents a version of Catholicism that is socially progressive on poverty and the environment but very traditional on morals.
- Peter Turkson (Ghana): He’s been a "papabile" (pope-able) for what feels like forever. He’s a brilliant communicator who has headed the Vatican's offices on peace and justice.
You've also got an outside chance with someone like Cardinal Pierbattista Pizzaballa, the Latin Patriarch of Jerusalem. Think about that for a second. A pope who has spent his career in the middle of the world’s most intense religious conflict? It’s a compelling narrative. He’s Italian, but he’s an "outsider" because he’s worked on the periphery.
The Traditionalist Pivot
Don't assume the next pope will be a carbon copy of Francis. There is a very real, very motivated group of cardinals who think the Church has become too "fuzzy" on doctrine. They want a "teacher" pope—someone like Benedict XVI.
Cardinal Péter Erdő from Hungary is the darling of the conservatives. He’s a canon lawyer, he’s brilliant, and he doesn’t mince words about upholding traditional marriage and liturgy. If the conclave feels like the "Francis experiment" went too far or caused too much confusion, they might swing the pendulum back toward someone like Erdő.
🔗 Read more: When Does Trump Become President 2025: What Most People Get Wrong
It's a bit of a tug-of-war. You have the "Global South" wanting a focus on poverty, the "Progressives" wanting a focus on inclusion, and the "Traditionalists" wanting a focus on clarity.
Why Predicting the Conclave is a Fool's Errand
The process is designed to be unpredictable. It’s not just a vote; it’s a retreat. The cardinals are cut off from the internet, their phones are taken away (allegedly), and they spend days in prayer.
Factors that actually matter:
- Languages: You can't lead a global organization if you only speak Italian and Latin.
- Health: No one wants a "transition" papacy that only lasts two years, but they also might be wary of another 25-year reign like John Paul II.
- The "Holy Spirit" Factor: Cardinals often say they feel a "surge" toward a candidate that nobody was talking about the week before.
Remember Karol Wojtyła (John Paul II)? Nobody saw him coming. He was a dark horse from Poland. Even Jorge Bergoglio (Francis) wasn't the top name on most lists in 2013; people were talking about Angelo Scola.
🔗 Read more: The Subway Fire Horror: What Actually Happened to the Woman Burned in Toronto
Actionable Insights for Following the Conclave
If you're watching the white smoke, keep these things in mind to understand what's actually happening behind those closed doors.
- Watch the first three ballots. If a frontrunner like Parolin doesn't get close to the majority quickly, his chances usually evaporate. The cardinals will start looking for a "compromise" candidate.
- Look for the "Old Guard" vs. the "New World." If the voting goes long, it usually means the European bloc and the Global South bloc are deadlocked.
- Pay attention to the Latin Patriarchate. If the world is in a state of crisis or war during the conclave, the cardinals often lean toward a "diplomat pope" rather than a "pastoral pope."
- Check the age. Cardinals usually look for someone between 65 and 75. Anyone older is a "placeholder"; anyone younger is a "long-term commitment."
The next Bishop of Rome won't just be a religious leader; he'll be a geopolitical player on a level few others can match. Whether he's a "street priest" from Italy or a "canon lawyer" from Hungary, he’ll inherit a 2,000-year-old institution trying to find its footing in a digital, polarized age. It’s a tough gig. Honestly, it might be the only job in the world where you're "most likely" to win by being the person nobody expected.
To get a real sense of the shift, look at the recent appointments to the College of Cardinals. That's where the real power lies. Look for patterns in where they come from—small dioceses in places like Mongolia or the Amazon. That tells you more about the future than any betting site ever will.
Next Steps for Deepening Your Knowledge
- Study the "Voter" List: Research the current list of Cardinal Electors (those under 80). Their backgrounds, more than the candidates themselves, dictate the outcome.
- Monitor the Pre-Conclave Meetings: Known as "General Congregations," these are where cardinals discuss the problems of the Church before voting starts. The themes that emerge here (e.g., "we need better finances" or "we need better youth outreach") usually point directly to the type of man they will elect.
- Read Past Encyclicals: To understand where the "Traditionalist" vs. "Progressive" lines are drawn, compare Francis's Laudato si' with Benedict XVI's Caritas in Veritate.
The smoke will eventually turn white, and when it does, the name announced might not be the one you've been reading about. That’s just the way Rome works.
[/article]