Honestly, if you haven’t checked the record books in the last year or two, you’re in for a massive shock. For decades, every baseball fan knew one thing for certain: Ty Cobb was the king of the mountain. His career mark was the gold standard that nobody—not even Ted Williams or Tony Gwynn—could ever hope to touch.
That’s not the case anymore.
The list of MLB batting average leaders all time went through a seismic shift recently. Major League Baseball finally did something it should have done a long time ago: they officially integrated the statistics of the Negro Leagues into the historical record. This wasn't just a ceremonial gesture. It fundamentally rewrote history.
The New King: Josh Gibson
When the dust settled on the data integration, a new name sat at the very top. Josh Gibson.
Basically, Gibson was the "Black Babe Ruth," though some folks at the time called Ruth the "White Josh Gibson." He was a catcher who could hit for power that defied physics, but his pure contact hitting was even more absurd. His official career batting average now stands at .371.
✨ Don't miss: Who Won the Fight Last Night: Beterbiev vs. Bivol and the Chaos in Riyadh
That number is terrifying.
Think about it this way: Ty Cobb, the man who terrified pitchers for 24 seasons, finished at .366 (or .367 depending on which database you trust more). Gibson beat him by four points. Gibson's 1943 season alone saw him hit .466. That isn't a typo. He was playing a different game than everyone else.
Why the Leaderboard Feels Different Now
You’ve probably grown up hearing about the "Deadball Era" versus the "Liveball Era." It’s how we separate the guys who hit singles and stole bases from the guys who started swinging for the fences after 1920.
But the Negro League integration adds a third layer.
- Josh Gibson (.371): The new all-time leader. He played for the Homestead Grays and Pittsburgh Crawfords.
- Ty Cobb (.366/.367): The "Georgia Peach." He won 12 batting titles. He was also, by most accounts, a pretty difficult human being.
- Oscar Charleston (.363): Another Negro League legend. He was a center fielder who combined the speed of Tris Speaker with the power of Lou Gehrig.
- Rogers Hornsby (.358): The "Rajah." He is still the record holder for the highest single-season average in the "modern" National League era, hitting .424 in 1924.
It’s wild to see names like Hornsby and Cobb move down a spot, but that’s the reality of a more complete history.
The Guys We Always Talk About
Even with the new rankings, the usual suspects still command respect.
Shoeless Joe Jackson is tucked in there with a career .356 average. It’s a tragedy, really. He was banned for life after the 1919 Black Sox scandal, meaning we never got to see his true "old man" decline years, which usually drag a player's average down. If he had played until he was 40, he might have finished at .340. But because he was forced out in his prime, his number stays frozen in time.
Then there’s Ted Williams.
"Teddy Ballgame" hit .344 over his career. You might think, "Wait, that's lower than the others." Sure. But Williams lost five years of his prime to military service—flying combat missions in two different wars. He’s also the last guy to hit over .400 in a season (.406 in 1941).
Most experts agree that if you ignore the era and just look at the "science" of hitting, Williams was the best to ever do it. He had a .482 on-base percentage. Basically, he reached base nearly half the time he stepped to the plate for twenty years.
What Most People Get Wrong About Batting Average
In today’s game, we’re obsessed with OPS (On-base plus Slugging) and exit velocity. Batting average has sort of become the "uncool" stat. But looking at the MLB batting average leaders all time reminds us of a specific skill that is dying out: the ability to put the ball in play.
Tony Gwynn is the modern outlier. He finished at .338. In 1994, he was hitting .394 when the strike ended the season. He was the closest we ever got to seeing another .400 hitter.
The common misconception is that these old-timers had it easy. People say, "Oh, they weren't facing 100 mph sliders." Maybe not. But they were playing with one ball for the whole game until it was black with dirt, using gloves that looked like oven mitts, and traveling by train in 100-degree heat with no AC.
The Top 10 (The Integrated List)
If you're looking for the definitive list as of 2026, here is how the top of the mountain looks. Keep in mind, different sources like Baseball-Reference and MLB.com sometimes have slight variations of a point or two due to how they verify box scores from the 1800s.
- Josh Gibson: .372 (rounded up in some systems)
- Ty Cobb: .366
- Oscar Charleston: .363
- Rogers Hornsby: .358
- Jud Wilson: .351
- Turkey Stearnes: .349
- Ed Delahanty: .346
- Tris Speaker: .345
- Ted Williams: .344
- Billy Hamilton: .344
The presence of Jud Wilson and Turkey Stearnes on this list is a revelation for casual fans. These guys were superstars who were hidden from the "official" record for a century.
Why We Won't See These Numbers Again
You’ve probably noticed that the current leaders in the league are lucky to hit .320.
The game has changed. Pitchers throw harder, relievers are specialized, and defensive shifting (even with the new rules) is more efficient than ever. In the 1920s, if you hit a hard ground ball, there was a good chance it was a hit. Today, there’s a guy standing exactly where that ball is going because a computer told him to be there.
Actionable insight for the modern fan: Don't compare Luis Arraez or Freddie Freeman directly to Ty Cobb. It's a different sport. Instead, look at how much better they are than their peers. A .330 average today is arguably as impressive as a .370 average was in 1910.
If you want to truly appreciate this history, go beyond the numbers. Read about Ed Delahanty, who once hit four home runs in a single game and then met a mysterious end at Niagara Falls. Or look up Tris Speaker, who played center field so shallow he basically functioned as a fifth infielder.
The numbers are just the entry point. The stories are what make the leaderboard worth keeping.
Next Steps for the Savvy Fan:
- Check out the National Baseball Hall of Fame's digital collection on the Negro Leagues to see the newly verified box scores.
- Compare "Live-Ball Era" leaders only (post-1920) if you want to see who would lead in the "home run" age—Ted Williams and Rogers Hornsby would jump to the top.
- Look at qualified active leaders like Jose Altuve or Freddie Freeman to see how far they have to go to even crack the top 100 (it's harder than you think).