Mira Murati just upended the entire Silicon Valley chessboard. After years spent as the public face and operational backbone of OpenAI, she’s gone solo to build something called Thinking Machines. It’s not just another startup. It’s a gamble on the next phase of intelligence.
People are obsessed with what happens next. When the woman who oversaw the launch of ChatGPT and DALL-E walks away from a $150 billion company, you listen. You pay attention because she isn't just looking for a better chatbot. She's looking for something deeper.
The Pivot Toward Mira Murati Thinking Machines
Everyone is asking the same question: Why now? Honestly, the timing was wild. Murati left OpenAI in late 2024 during a massive restructuring phase. She didn't wait around. Reports soon surfaced about her raising massive capital—rumors suggest north of $100 million—to fund a new venture. That venture is Mira Murati Thinking Machines.
The name itself is a callback. It feels vintage yet futuristic. It’s a nod to the early days of computer science when we didn't call them "agents" or "models." We called them machines that could think. This isn't just branding; it's a statement of intent. Most current AI is predictive. It guesses the next word in a sequence. Murati seems to be chasing actual reasoning.
Building a new AI lab from scratch in 2026 is incredibly expensive. You need chips. Thousands of them. NVIDIA H100s and B200s don't grow on trees. But Murati has the one thing most founders lack: the trust of the world's biggest VCs. When she calls, people pick up the phone. They know she can hire the best talent in the world because half of them probably worked for her already.
What Makes "Thinking" Different From "Predicting"
We've all used GPT-4. It's smart, sure. But it hallucinates. It gets confident about wrong answers. It doesn't "think" in the way a human does—it doesn't ponder, reflect, or double-check its own logic before speaking.
👉 See also: What Is Hack Meaning? Why the Internet Keeps Changing the Definition
Mira Murati Thinking Machines is reportedly focusing on reasoning-heavy models.
Think about the difference between a calculator and a mathematician. A calculator gives you the answer instantly. A mathematician shows the work, corrects their own errors, and understands why the formula exists. Murati’s new venture wants to bridge that gap. We are talking about AI that can handle complex engineering, scientific discovery, and autonomous problem-solving without the "babble" of traditional LLMs.
The technical community is split on whether this is possible with current transformer architecture. Some say we’ve hit a wall. Others, likely including Murati, believe that by focusing on "system 2" thinking—slow, deliberate reasoning—we can unlock the next tier of capability.
The Talent War and the OpenAI Exodus
You can't build a frontier model alone. You need the "brain trust."
Since her departure, several high-profile researchers have followed suit or expressed interest in the new direction. This is a classic Silicon Valley cycle. Fairchild Semiconductor birthed Intel. PayPal birthed Tesla and Palantir. Now, OpenAI is birthing the next generation of competitors.
✨ Don't miss: Why a 9 digit zip lookup actually saves you money (and headaches)
- Barret Zoph: A key researcher involved in post-training who left around the same time.
- The Post-Training Specialists: Rumors suggest Murati is cherry-picking experts who specialize in making models safer and more logical.
It’s about culture. OpenAI became a massive, somewhat corporate entity. It’s no longer the lean lab it was in 2018. For a researcher who wants to move fast and break things (or build things that don't break), a startup like Thinking Machines is intoxicating. It’s the "pirate ship" mentality.
The Challenges No One Talks About
Let's be real for a second. This is going to be incredibly hard.
First, there’s the data. Most of the high-quality public data has already been scraped. To train a "Thinking Machine," Murati will need specialized, proprietary data or synthetic data that doesn't lead to "model collapse." If you train an AI on AI-generated junk, the quality falls off a cliff.
Second, there’s the compute. Unless she strikes a massive deal with Microsoft, Google, or Amazon, she’s going to be paying retail prices for compute. That burns through $100 million in a heartbeat.
Third, the competition is fierce. Anthropic is already focused on "Constitutional AI." xAI is moving at light speed. Meta is giving away Llama for free. Why would a company pay for a Thinking Machines model when they can use a "good enough" model for pennies?
🔗 Read more: Why the time on Fitbit is wrong and how to actually fix it
The answer has to be unrivaled reliability. If Murati can deliver a model that 100% does not hallucinate in technical contexts, she wins. Period.
Why This Matters to You
You might think this is just billionaire drama. It’s not.
If Mira Murati Thinking Machines succeeds, the way we interact with software changes. We move away from "chatting" with a bot and toward "collaborating" with an expert.
Imagine an AI that can audit an entire company’s tax returns and find the one error no human could see. Or an AI that can design a new drug molecule by reasoning through biological constraints rather than just guessing. This is the promise of "Thinking Machines." It's about moving from a toy to a tool.
Actionable Insights for the AI Shift
If you’re watching this space, don’t just wait for the product launch. The landscape is shifting under our feet. Here is how to stay ahead of the curve as the "reasoning era" of AI begins:
- Focus on Logic, Not Just Prompting: As models get better at thinking, the "tricks" of prompt engineering (like telling the AI to "take a deep breath") will become obsolete. Focus on clearly defining problems and constraints.
- Watch the Hardware Partnerships: Keep an eye on where Murati gets her chips. If she partners with a specific cloud provider, that's where her ecosystem will live.
- Diversify Your AI Stack: Don't tie your business or your workflow to just one model. The "OpenAI hegemony" is over. We are entering a multi-polar world where Thinking Machines, Anthropic, and others will each have specific strengths.
- Prioritize Verification: Even with "Thinking Machines," the "Human-in-the-loop" model remains vital. Learn how to verify AI outputs using independent tools and logic.
The era of the "chatty bot" is ending. The era of the "Thinking Machine" is just getting started. It’s a messy, expensive, and incredibly ambitious transition, but if anyone has the roadmap to navigate it, it’s probably the person who helped build the world we’re living in right now.