Men Forced to Become Women: The Real History of Coercive Gender Reassignment

Men Forced to Become Women: The Real History of Coercive Gender Reassignment

History is messy. When we talk about men forced to become women, people usually think of fringe internet tropes or sci-fi plots, but the reality is much heavier and rooted in medical malpractice. We are talking about actual clinical history. Specifically, the era of "intersex management" and the experiments that defined mid-20th-century psychology. It’s a dark corner of medicine.

You’ve probably heard of David Reimer. If you haven’t, his story is the baseline for why "forcing" a gender identity on someone is a catastrophic failure of ethics. In 1966, a botched circumcision left an infant boy, Bruce Reimer, without a penis. His parents, desperate and lost, turned to Dr. John Money at Johns Hopkins University. Money was a big name. He believed gender was a social construct—basically, that you could "make" a boy into a girl if you started early enough.

The John Money Experiment and the Lie of Neutrality

Dr. Money convinced the parents to raise Bruce as "Brenda." This wasn't just about clothes. It involved surgical "reconstruction" and years of estrogen treatments. Money published papers claiming the transition was a total success. He used it as proof that "nurture" beats "nature."

But he lied.

Brenda hated it. She felt like a boy. She fought against the dresses and the dolls. She was miserable, bullied, and confused. It wasn't until her teens that her father finally told her the truth. At that point, Brenda transitioned back to being a man, taking the name David. He eventually married and tried to live a normal life, but the trauma was deep. David Reimer ended his own life in 2004.

This case is the most prominent example of a man forced to become a woman through medical intervention, and it completely dismantled the "gender neutrality at birth" theory that was popular in the 70s. It proved that biological sex and internal gender identity aren't just clay you can mold.

The Ethics of Intersex Surgeries

For decades, many male infants born with ambiguous genitalia—often referred to as intersex—were "assigned" female by doctors. Why? Because, as the old, incredibly grim surgical saying went, "It’s easier to hole than to build a pole." Surgeons found it technically simpler to create female-presenting anatomy than male-presenting anatomy.

💡 You might also like: Beard transplant before and after photos: Why they don't always tell the whole story

This resulted in thousands of biological males being raised as girls without their consent.

Groups like the Intersex Society of North America (ISNA) have spent years fighting this. They argue that performing these surgeries on infants is a human rights violation. You’re essentially forcing a gender onto someone before they can even speak. When these individuals grow up, many experience intense gender dysphoria. They feel like men trapped in bodies that were surgically altered to look like women. It’s a forced transition by another name.

Political and Cultural Coercion

It’s not always medical. Sometimes it’s about survival.

In some cultures, men have been forced into female roles due to legal loopholes or social survival. Take Iran, for example. In the late 80s, Ayatollah Khomeini issued a fatwa making gender reassignment surgery legal for "diagnosed" trans people. On the surface, it looks progressive for the region. But there’s a catch. Homosexuality is still a capital crime in Iran.

Human rights observers, including those from Human Rights Watch, have noted a disturbing trend: gay men in Iran are sometimes pressured—or effectively forced—to undergo gender reassignment surgery to avoid the death penalty. If you are a man who loves men, the state says you must "become" a woman to make that love "legal."

It’s a horrific choice.

📖 Related: Anal sex and farts: Why it happens and how to handle the awkwardness

  1. Face execution or lashings.
  2. Undergo a life-altering surgery you don’t actually want.

This creates a situation where cisgender gay men are living as women not because they are transgender, but because they want to stay alive. It’s a perversion of healthcare. It uses transition as a tool of erasure rather than affirmation.

The Psychosis of "Conversion Therapy" in Reverse

We usually think of conversion therapy as trying to turn someone straight. But history has weird, dark echoes. In the mid-20th century, some psychiatrists believed that "feminizing" sensitive or "effeminate" boys would "fix" their underlying psychological issues. They weren't trying to help them transition in the modern sense; they were trying to force them into a different box because they didn't fit the "alpha male" mold of the 1950s.

Modern medicine has mostly moved away from this, but the scars remain in the medical literature. Experts like Dr. Milton Diamond, who famously challenged John Money’s findings, argued for years that the brain has a "sex" from birth. You can't just flip a switch.

Why Does This Matter Now?

Because we’re still arguing about who gets to decide what happens to a person’s body. The history of men forced to become women reminds us that "medical consensus" can sometimes be dead wrong. It shows that autonomy is the most important factor in gender and identity.

When a doctor or a state decides for you, it usually ends in tragedy.

It’s also important to distinguish this history from the modern trans movement. Most people transitioning today are doing so because they want to—they are seeking relief from dysphoria. The "forced" aspect in historical cases like David Reimer is the exact opposite of modern gender-affirming care, which is built on the patient's own self-identification.

👉 See also: Am I a Narcissist? What Most People Get Wrong About the Self-Reflection Trap

What We Can Learn From the Data

The failure rate of forced transitions is nearly 100%. In studies of children with cloacal exstrophy (a birth defect involving the genitals) who were assigned female at birth despite being XY (male), a significant majority eventually transitioned back to male as adults.

  • Nature is stubborn.
  • Hormones and brain structure play a massive role.
  • Social engineering cannot override biology.

Actionable Insights for the Future

If we want to avoid repeating these historical horrors, the path forward is pretty clear. It's about slowing down and listening to the individual rather than the "system."

Wait for Consent in Intersex Cases
The medical community is slowly shifting toward a "wait-and-see" approach. Unless a surgery is medically necessary for physical health (like urination), many advocates say we should wait until the child is old enough to express their own identity. Don't force a "male" or "female" label on someone who can't choose yet.

Recognize the Signs of Coercion
In legal and medical frameworks, always look for the "why." If someone is seeking a transition to avoid punishment (like in Iran) or because a parent is pushing a specific narrative (like in the Reimer case), it’s not healthcare. It’s coercion.

Support Autonomy
The biggest takeaway? Body autonomy is everything. Whether it's resisting forced feminization or supporting someone's right to transition voluntarily, the individual must be the one in the driver's seat.

Educate on Biological Nuance
Understand that sex and gender are complex, but they aren't "blank slates." Respecting the biological reality that someone might feel like a man despite what a doctor did to them as an infant is the first step toward healing those historical wounds.

The story of men forced to become women isn't a story of progress. It's a cautionary tale about what happens when "experts" think they know more about a person's soul than the person does.

Moving Forward

We have to keep these stories alive so we don't repeat them. If you’re interested in the ethics of this, look into the work of the Intersex Campaign for Equality or read "As Nature Made Him: The Boy Who Was Raised as a Girl" by John Colapinto. It’s the definitive account of the Reimer case. Understanding the difference between forced intervention and voluntary care is the only way to ensure medical ethics stay on the right side of history. Stop trying to "fix" what isn't broken. Listen to the patients. That's the only real solution.