You’ve probably seen the photos. A massive horseshoe-shaped table in New York. Serious-looking diplomats in expensive suits. Each one has a little nameplate. These are the members of UN Security Council, the people who—on paper, at least—have the power to stop wars, slap sanctions on dictators, and authorize the use of military force.
But here’s the thing. Most people think this group is a fixed, monolithic block of power. It isn't. It’s actually a strange, often clunky mix of "Old World" victors and a rotating door of smaller nations trying to get a word in edgewise. Honestly, it’s kind of a miracle anything gets signed at all.
Who is actually at the table in 2026?
Right now, as we sit in 2026, the room is split into two very different camps. You have the "Big Five" (the P5) who never leave, and the "Elected Ten" (the E10) who are basically on a two-year lease.
The permanent members are the usual suspects:
- The United States
- China
- Russia
- France
- The United Kingdom
These five have been there since 1945. They have the veto. That’s the big red button. If one of them says "no," the whole resolution dies, even if the other 14 members are screaming "yes."
Then you have the non-permanent members. These seats are rotated to keep things "fair," though "fair" is a flexible term in international politics. For the 2026 term, the lineup includes some fresh faces and some returning veterans.
The Non-Permanent Class of 2026
The current roster of elected members is a mix of those halfway through their term and those who just started on January 1st:
- Latvia (A big deal—this is their first time ever on the Council).
- Bahrain
- Colombia
- Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC)
- Liberia
- Denmark (Term ending Dec 2026)
- Greece (Term ending Dec 2026)
- Pakistan (Term ending Dec 2026)
- Panama (Term ending Dec 2026)
- Somalia (Term ending Dec 2026)
Latvia’s inclusion is pretty significant. They’ve been pushing for this for years, and it gives the Baltic states a direct seat at the table during a time when Eastern European security is, well, let's just say "tense."
The "Veto" Problem: Why Nothing Seems to Happen
If you feel like the Security Council is just a place where countries go to argue while the world burns, you’re not entirely wrong. The members of UN Security Council are paralyzed by the veto.
The veto was originally designed to prevent the UN from taking action against a major global power, which would basically trigger World War III. But nowadays? It’s used to protect allies.
Take 2025. Vetoes were cast four times in a single year. We saw it used to block action in Gaza and Sudan. When the P5 can't agree, the Council is effectively a debating club. This has led to a massive "trust deficit." Countries like Malaysia and Kenya have been incredibly vocal lately, calling the veto "undemocratic" and "outdated." They aren't wrong, but the P5 aren't exactly rushing to give up their superpowers.
How do you even get elected?
You don't just show up. To become one of the non-permanent members of UN Security Council, you need a two-thirds majority vote in the General Assembly. That’s 129 votes if everyone shows up.
👉 See also: What Time Is It Going to Rain Today: The Mid-January Mess Explained
It’s like a high-stakes high school election, but with more oil contracts and development aid involved. Countries campaign for years. They host lavish dinners. They promise to support other countries' initiatives.
The seats are also geographically "locked":
- Africa and Asia: 5 seats
- Eastern Europe: 1 seat
- Latin America and the Caribbean: 2 seats
- Western Europe and Others: 2 seats
In the 2025 elections (for the 2026-2027 term), Bahrain sailed through with 186 votes. Latvia got 178. It shows that despite the Council’s flaws, countries still desperately want to be in the room where it happens.
The 2026 Reality: A Council Under Pressure
We are currently living through a weird moment for the UN. On January 7, 2026, the U.S. issued a memorandum threatening to pull funding from various UN bodies. This puts the other members of UN Security Council in a tight spot.
If the biggest donor walks away, who picks up the tab? China is more than happy to increase its influence, but that shifts the entire balance of the Council.
Is reform actually coming?
Everyone talks about reform. The "G4"—India, Japan, Germany, and Brazil—are constantly knocking on the door, demanding permanent seats. They argue that a Council based on 1945's winners doesn't make sense in 2026.
But here is the catch: to change the Council, you have to amend the UN Charter. And to amend the Charter, you need the approval of—you guessed it—the five permanent members. It's a closed loop.
What this means for you
Why should you care about who the members of UN Security Council are? Because their decisions (or lack thereof) affect global gas prices, refugee flows, and whether or not a regional conflict stays regional.
When the Council authorizes a peacekeeping mission in the DRC (a current member), it affects the stability of an entire continent. When they fail to act on climate-related security threats, it hits the insurance premiums of people thousands of miles away.
Key Takeaways for 2026:
- The P5 are still in charge, but their legitimacy is at an all-time low due to frequent vetoes.
- New blood like Latvia and the DRC are bringing ground-level perspectives on conflict, but they have no power to override the "Big Five."
- Funding is the new battlefield. With the U.S. wavering on financial support, the Council's ability to actually enforce its resolutions is under threat.
If you want to keep tabs on what's happening, watch the monthly presidency. The chair rotates every month. In April 2026, Bahrain takes the wheel. In June, it’s Colombia. Each president sets the "signature" agenda for their month. That’s where you see the real priorities—or at least the ones they want the world to see.
✨ Don't miss: Who Are All Of The Presidential Candidates: The Names You Saw On The Ballot (And Why)
To get a clearer picture of how these dynamics play out in real-time, you should follow the "UN Security Council Report" (an independent NGO) or watch the live sessions on UN Web TV. It’s often dry, but when a vote starts, it’s the highest-stakes drama on earth.
Next Steps for Understanding Global Power:
- Check the Presidency Schedule: See which country is currently setting the agenda to understand which global issues (like the DRC conflict or South China Sea) will be prioritized.
- Monitor Veto Usage: Keep an eye on the "Veto Initiative" records in the General Assembly. Whenever a P5 member uses a veto, they now have to justify it to the entire 193-nation assembly.
- Follow the G4 Proposals: Watch the ongoing sessions on "Equitable Representation." If India or Brazil makes a breakthrough, it will be the biggest change to global governance in 80 years.