When people think of Mary Shelley, they usually think of a green guy with bolts in his neck. Honestly, that’s a shame. While Frankenstein is the heavy hitter, Shelley wrote something else in 1826 that is arguably way more terrifying because it’s so eerily plausible. I’m talking about Mary Shelley The Last Man.
It’s a book about the end of the world. But not a "zombies and shotguns" kind of end. It’s a slow, agonizing, and deeply lonely fade-out. Imagine writing a story in the 1820s about a global pandemic that wipes out humanity by the year 2100. That’s what she did. And the wild part? In 2026, we’re reading it and realizing she basically predicted how humans act when everything falls apart.
The Story Everyone Ignored (Until Now)
When this book first hit the shelves, critics absolutely hated it. They called it "the offspring of a diseased imagination." Ouch. It was so poorly received that it basically disappeared for over a century. People just weren't ready for a story where everyone dies and there’s no happy ending.
The plot follows Lionel Verney. He starts as a poor shepherd and ends up—you guessed it—the last human being on Earth. Along the way, he hangs out with characters who are thinly veiled versions of Shelley’s real-life friends. Lord Raymond is clearly Lord Byron. Adrian, Earl of Windsor, is a dead ringer for her husband, Percy Bysshe Shelley.
It’s basically a Roman à clef set in a dystopian future.
💡 You might also like: Songs by Tyler Childers: What Most People Get Wrong
The first half is all about political drama and love triangles in a futuristic England that has ditched the monarchy for a republic. Then, a plague starts in the East. At first, the characters in England are smug. They think they’re safe because of their "civilization" and distance. Sound familiar?
By the time the plague reaches London, the tone shifts from a soap opera to a nightmare. People stop caring about politics. They stop caring about art. They just try to survive, and mostly, they fail.
Why Mary Shelley The Last Man Still Matters
You've probably noticed that we’re obsessed with post-apocalyptic stories today. The Last of Us, Station Eleven, Fallout. We love watching the world end. But Shelley did it first, and she did it with a specific kind of grief that most modern writers can't touch.
By 1826, Mary Shelley was basically a "last man" herself. Her husband had drowned. Most of her children were dead. Her best friend, Lord Byron, had died in Greece. She was writing from a place of total personal isolation.
📖 Related: Questions From Black Card Revoked: The Culture Test That Might Just Get You Roasted
- The "Slow" Apocalypse: Unlike a nuclear blast, this plague takes years to kill everyone. This allows Shelley to explore how society slowly rots.
- The Failure of Science: In Frankenstein, science is too powerful. In Mary Shelley The Last Man, science is useless. Doctors can’t do anything. The astronomers just watch the stars while people die in the streets.
- Nature Doesn't Care: This is the big one. Shelley describes a world where, as humans die off, nature actually starts doing better. The animals are fine. The trees are green. The world doesn't end when we do; it just moves on without us.
The Real-Life Inspiration
Shelley wasn't just pulling this out of thin air. She was living through a time of massive global shifts. The 1815 eruption of Mount Tambora caused a "Year Without a Summer," leading to crop failures and famine. Then there was the first cholera pandemic (1817–1824). She saw how quickly a "civilized" world could be brought to its knees by a microscopic germ or a change in the weather.
The Problem with the Book
Look, I'm not going to lie to you—it’s not a perfect read. It's long. The prose is very "19th-century flowery." Sometimes the characters spend three pages talking about their feelings while a literal plague is outside the door.
Also, we have to talk about the "orientalism." Like a lot of writers in the 1800s, Shelley frames the plague as something coming from "the East" to destroy "Western civilization." It’s a reflection of the anxieties of the British Empire at the time, but it can be a tough pill to swallow for a modern reader.
How to Experience it Today
If you want to get into Mary Shelley The Last Man, don't just grab a dusty copy and try to power through the first 100 pages of political talk.
👉 See also: The Reality of Sex Movies From Africa: Censorship, Nollywood, and the Digital Underground
- Try an Audiobook: The long descriptions of the English countryside and the philosophical debates go down much easier when someone is reading them to you.
- Focus on the Second Half: The book really picks up when the plague hits. If you're struggling, skim the early stuff to get to the "end of the world" vibes.
- Read the Biographical Context: Knowing that Lord Raymond is Byron makes his arrogant, heroic death in Constantinople way more interesting.
The ending is what stays with you. Lionel Verney, alone in Rome, wandering through empty palaces, writing his story for a future that will never exist. It’s haunting. It's the ultimate "what if?"
Shelley's message is pretty clear: our politics, our empires, and our egos don't mean a thing to a virus or a storm. We only exist because nature lets us, and that's a lesson we're still trying to learn two centuries later.
If you're looking for a deep dive into Romantic-era dread, your next step is to look up the "Summer of 1816" at Villa Diodati. It's the moment when Shelley, Byron, and Percy were all trapped indoors by bad weather, challenging each other to write ghost stories. That’s where the seeds for both Frankenstein and the apocalyptic themes of her later work were sown.