History hasn't been kind to Mary I. Most people know her as a cocktail or a ghost in a mirror, but the real woman was way more complicated than a simple villain archetype. She was the first queen regnant of England, a survivor of a truly messed-up childhood, and a woman who genuinely believed she was saving the souls of her people from eternal hellfire.
She wasn't just "Bloody Mary." That's mostly propaganda.
Think about it. You've got a girl whose dad, Henry VIII, basically deleted her mother from history. He declared Mary illegitimate. He stripped her of her title as Princess. He even forced her to serve as a lady-in-waiting to her own half-sister, Elizabeth. It’s the kind of family trauma that would make anyone a little intense later in life. Mary I of England didn't just walk into the throne; she fought for it, and she did it with the overwhelming support of a public that actually wanted her there.
The Myth of the Unpopular Queen
Most textbooks make it sound like the English people were terrified when Mary took the crown in 1553. Honestly? The opposite is true. When the "Nine Days' Queen" Jane Grey was put on the throne by a small group of powerful men, the common people flocked to Mary. They saw her as the rightful heir. They loved her. They cheered in the streets of London when she rode in.
She was a Tudor. People liked the Tudors.
But Mary had a mission that didn't involve being popular for long. She was a devout Catholic in a country that had been undergoing a messy, state-mandated Protestant Reformation for decades. To Mary, the "New Religion" wasn't just wrong—it was a literal infection. If you were a ruler in the 16th century and you thought your subjects were going to burn in hell for eternity because of their beliefs, you'd probably do something drastic too. That was her logic. It wasn't about being mean. It was about what she saw as spiritual surgery.
Let’s Talk About the Fires at Smithfield
You can't talk about Mary I of England without talking about the burnings. It’s the elephant in the room. During her five-year reign, roughly 280-300 people were burned at the stake for heresy. That’s a lot. It’s a horrific number of people to execute for their religious convictions. But here is where context gets ignored. Her father, Henry VIII, executed thousands. Her sister, Elizabeth I, also executed hundreds, though she was smarter about the optics—she executed them for "treason" rather than "heresy," which played better in the history books.
✨ Don't miss: Exactly What Month is Ramadan 2025 and Why the Dates Shift
Mary’s problem was her choice of method.
Burning was a slow, public, and incredibly visceral way to die. It was designed to mimic the fires of hell. John Foxe, a Protestant writer who published Foxe's Book of Martyrs shortly after Mary died, did a brilliant job of making sure every single gruesome detail was recorded and amplified. He basically created the "Bloody Mary" brand. Without Foxe’s specific brand of spin, we might remember Mary as "Mary the Pious" or "Mary the Traditionalist."
Instead, we remember the smoke.
The Tragedy of the False Pregnancies
Mary's personal life was a series of heartbreaks that played out on a national stage. She married Philip of Spain, a man she was reportedly quite fond of, but who basically saw her as a political tool. He spent as little time in England as possible. Mary, desperate for an heir to secure the Catholic succession, experienced two separate "phantom" pregnancies.
She grew large. She felt life. She prepared the nurseries.
And then, nothing.
🔗 Read more: Dutch Bros Menu Food: What Most People Get Wrong About the Snacks
In 1555, the court waited for months for a baby that never came. It was a massive public humiliation. Imagine being the Queen of England, believing God has blessed you with a child to save your kingdom, only to realize your body has essentially lied to you. It happened again in 1558. These weren't just medical anomalies; they were psychological blows that convinced Mary she had somehow failed God. Some historians, like Anna Whitelock, suggest these phantom pregnancies might have been signs of uterine cancer or pituitary tumors—the very things that eventually killed her.
Why She Actually Matters (Beyond the Blood)
If we stop obsessing over the executions for a second, Mary I was actually a pretty competent administrator. She did things that Elizabeth I later got all the credit for.
- Naval Reform: Mary started the process of rebuilding the English Navy. You know, the one that famously defeated the Spanish Armada under Elizabeth? Mary laid the groundwork for that.
- Fiscal Policy: She restructured the way the government handled money, making it more efficient and less reliant on debased currency.
- The Blueprint for a Queen: Before Mary, nobody knew if a woman could actually rule England in her own right. There was no precedent. She proved a woman could command an army, manage a parliament, and hold the crown without a man pulling the strings.
She was the pioneer. Elizabeth just had a better PR team and lived forty years longer.
The Loss of Calais and the End of an Era
The end of Mary's reign was, frankly, a bit of a disaster. She got dragged into a war with France because of her husband Philip, and England ended up losing Calais. This was the last English territory on mainland Europe. Mary reportedly said that when she died, the word "Calais" would be found engraved on her heart.
She died in November 1558 during a flu epidemic, lonely and aware that her Protestant sister would immediately undo everything she had worked for.
What We Get Wrong Today
We tend to look at the past in black and white. Mary was the "bad" Catholic and Elizabeth was the "good" Protestant. But it's never that simple. Mary was a woman who was pushed to the brink by her father, abandoned by her husband, and driven by a faith that she believed was the only truth. She wasn't a monster; she was a Tudor. And Tudors were, by nature, pretty ruthless when they thought they were right.
💡 You might also like: Draft House Las Vegas: Why Locals Still Flock to This Old School Sports Bar
Honestly, the "Bloody Mary" nickname is a bit of a lazy trope. If we judged every monarch by their body count, the list of "Bloody" kings and queens would be a mile long. Mary just happened to lose the historical narrative because her successors were the ones who wrote the books.
Actionable Insights for History Buffs
If you want to understand Mary I of England beyond the surface-level myths, here is how to actually dig into the real history:
Read the primary sources, not just the summaries.
Look at the letters Mary wrote during her time at Hunsdon while her father was trying to break her will. You’ll see a teenager with incredible backbone. Check out the Spanish State Papers for a glimpse into how her husband's court actually viewed her.
Visit the sites with a critical eye.
If you go to the Tower of London or Smithfield, don't just look at the plaques about the martyrs. Look for the evidence of the legitimate government she ran. The coins minted during her reign tell a story of economic stabilization that is often ignored.
Compare her to her peers.
Don't just compare Mary to a modern standard of "goodness." Compare her to Charles V of the Holy Roman Empire or Catherine de' Medici. When you see what was happening in the rest of Europe at the time, her actions—while still extreme—look a lot more like standard 16th-century statecraft and a lot less like a personal vendetta.
Evaluate the "Successor Bias."
Whenever you read about Mary, ask: "Who wrote this, and when?" Most of the popular history regarding Mary was written during the reign of Elizabeth or the Victorian era, both of which had massive incentives to make Mary look as incompetent and cruel as possible to justify the Protestant settlement.