Gaming was a war zone in the 90s. Honestly, if you weren't there, it’s hard to describe the sheer tribalism of the playground. You were either a Nintendo kid, a Sega loyalist, or, eventually, the "cool" older sibling with a PlayStation. At the heart of this chaos stood three mascots: Mario, Sonic and Crash. They weren't just characters. They were corporate identities.
Fast forward to 2026, and the landscape has shifted so much it’s unrecognizable. Sega doesn't make consoles. Sony is a cinematic powerhouse. Nintendo is... well, Nintendo. But these three icons? They survived. While Bubsy and Gex ended up in the bargain bin of history, the holy trinity of platforming managed to pivot, evolve, and sometimes just stubbornly exist until they became relevant again.
The Secret History of Mario Sonic and Crash
It’s easy to think of these three as a continuous timeline, but they represent very different philosophies of game design. Shigeru Miyamoto’s Mario was always about the "feel" of the jump. If the physics weren't perfect, the game didn't ship. Sega’s Sonic the Hedgehog was a direct middle finger to that slow, methodical pace. Naoto Ohshima and Yuji Naka wanted speed. They wanted "blast processing," even if that was mostly a marketing buzzword.
Then came the outlier.
In 1996, Naughty Dog—a tiny studio at the time—released Crash Bandicoot. It changed everything. Before Crash, 3D platforming was mostly about open spaces like Super Mario 64. Naughty Dog did something different. They made "the sonic’s ass game." That’s literally what they called it internally because you were mostly looking at the character’s back while running down a linear corridor. It was a technical marvel that pushed the PlayStation's limited hardware to its breaking point by using clever "pre-calculated" visibility.
👉 See also: Why 3d mahjong online free is actually harder than the classic version
Why Mario Never Truly Had a Rival
Let’s be real for a second. While we talk about Mario, Sonic and Crash as equals, the sales data and critical reception usually tell a different story. Mario is the gold standard. From the precision of Super Mario World to the galaxy-bending gravity of Super Mario Galaxy, Nintendo has a freakish ability to reinvent the wheel without losing the tire.
Sonic, on the other hand, had a rough decade. Or two.
The transition to 3D was brutal for the Blue Blur. While Sonic Adventure had its charms, the "Sonic Cycle" became a meme for a reason. Fans would get excited, the game would release with buggy physics and a weird story about a human princess, and everyone would go back to playing Sonic Mania. It wasn't until Sonic Frontiers that Sega finally figured out how to make speed work in a large-scale environment.
Crash Bandicoot almost died out entirely. After the original trilogy on PS1 and the legendary Crash Team Racing, the IP bounced around different developers like a hot potato. Travelers Tales, Radical Entertainment—everyone had a go. Most of it was mediocre. It took the N. Sane Trilogy remake in 2017 to prove to Activision that people actually still cared about a spinning marsupial in blue jeans.
✨ Don't miss: Venom in Spider-Man 2: Why This Version of the Symbiote Actually Works
The Technical Leap: From Sprites to Polygons
The shift from 2D to 3D wasn't just a visual upgrade. It was a total mechanical rewrite. Mario handled it by creating a 360-degree analog movement system that felt like butter. Crash handled it by staying on rails, which allowed for much higher-fidelity graphics than Mario 64 could dream of. Sonic... well, Sonic struggled because high-speed precision in a 3D space is a nightmare for a camera programmer.
If you look at the code of those early games, it's wild. Crash Bandicoot used a custom assembly language to bypass the PlayStation’s standard libraries. That’s why it looks so much better than almost any other 1996 title. Mario, meanwhile, relied on the N64’s silicon power to handle Z-buffering and anti-aliasing. They were solving the same problem—how do we jump in 3D?—with completely different math.
The Modern Comeback
What’s fascinating about Mario, Sonic and Crash today is how they’ve diversified.
- Mario is a movie star now. The Illumination film cleared a billion dollars.
- Sonic found his niche in a weirdly successful live-action movie franchise that actually respected the source material.
- Crash returned to his roots with Crash 4: It’s About Time, which was arguably harder than the original games.
The "Mascot Era" isn't over; it just looks different. It's more about "legacy" now. When a new Mario game drops, it's an event. When a new Sonic game drops, the internet braces for impact. When Crash shows up, it's a nostalgic hug for the 90s kids who are now buying games for their own children.
🔗 Read more: The Borderlands 4 Vex Build That Actually Works Without All the Grind
Real Talk: The Misconceptions
People often say Crash was Sony's Mario. He wasn't. Sony didn't even own him; Universal Interactive did. That’s why Crash eventually went multi-platform, appearing on the Xbox and even the Nintendo Switch. It was a weird era. Seeing Crash on a Nintendo console felt like seeing a Pepsi machine in a Coca-Cola factory.
Another big myth? That Sonic was "faster" because of the hardware. The Genesis was fast, sure, but Sonic’s speed was a result of clever level design and momentum-based physics, not some magical "Blast Processing" chip that Nintendo lacked. It was all marketing. Brilliant, aggressive marketing that defined a generation.
Actionable Insights for Fans and Collectors
If you're looking to dive back into these franchises, don't just grab the first thing you see on the digital storefront.
- For Mario: Start with Super Mario Odyssey. It’s the perfect bridge between the old-school 64-style exploration and modern polish. If you want 2D, Super Mario Bros. Wonder is the most creative the series has been in twenty years.
- For Sonic: Skip the mid-2000s era unless you’re a glutton for punishment. Play Sonic Mania for the 2D fix and Sonic Frontiers to see where the series is going next.
- For Crash: The N. Sane Trilogy is the only place to start. It’s a faithful recreation of the originals. Just be warned: the jump physics in the first game’s remake are slightly "tighter" than the original, making it actually more difficult.
The rivalry is dead, but the icons remain. We live in a world where you can play as Mario and Sonic in the same game, and Crash is owned by Microsoft. It's a strange timeline, but for fans of platformers, it’s probably the best one we’ve ever had.
The focus now should be on preservation. Many of the original versions of these games are locked on aging hardware. While remakes are great, the original "feel" of a 1991 Sonic jump or a 1996 Crash spin is something that software emulation still struggles to perfectly replicate without input lag. If you have the original consoles, keep them. They are literally pieces of history.