Ever feel like you can't walk into a movie theater or open a streaming app without hearing about infinite timelines? It’s everywhere. We’re obsessed with the idea of a Lord of the Multiverse, that singular figure who sits at the center of all possible realities, pulling the strings. It’s a concept that used to be buried in the back of obscure comic books, but now? It's the backbone of billion-dollar empires.
Think about it.
Marvel has Kang the Conqueror and He Who Remains. DC has the Anti-Monitor. Even indie darlings like Everything Everywhere All At Once play with the notion of a Jobu Tupaki figure—an entity that has seen everything and, as a result, lost their mind or their soul. But why are we so hooked on this specific brand of power? Honestly, it’s probably because our own world feels so chaotic that we find comfort in the idea that someone, even a villain, is actually in charge of the mess.
The Evolution of the Multiverse Ruler
Back in the day, a villain just wanted to take over a city. Maybe a planet. If they were really ambitious, they’d go for the galaxy. But the Lord of the Multiverse is a different beast entirely. We aren't talking about geographic control anymore. We are talking about the control of causality itself.
Take Michael Moorcock’s Eternal Champion sequence. This is where a lot of these "cosmic nexus" ideas really started to cook in the 1960s and 70s. Moorcock didn't just write one hero; he wrote a hero who existed in every reality, sometimes as Elric of Melniboné, sometimes as Corum. They were all facets of one soul. It’s high-concept stuff that paved the way for the "Council of Kangs" or the "Council of Ricks" we see today.
When you look at someone like the Beyonder from Marvel’s original Secret Wars (1984), you see the prototype. He wasn't just a guy with a gun. He was a sentient universe. He plucked heroes and villains from their homes just to see who would win a fight. It was basically a kid playing with action figures, which is a perfect metaphor for how writers treat these characters. They are the ultimate "meta" characters. They know they are in a story, or at least, they know the story has infinite versions.
Why "All-Powerful" Is Actually Kind of Boring
There is a huge risk with the Lord of the Multiverse concept. If a character can do anything, why should we care? This is the "Superman Problem" scaled up to an infinite degree. If you can blink and delete a universe, tension usually goes out the window.
✨ Don't miss: Adam Scott in Step Brothers: Why Derek is Still the Funniest Part of the Movie
The best versions of this trope focus on the burden of the crown.
In the MCU, the character of He Who Remains (played by Jonathan Majors) wasn't scary because he could shoot lasers. He was scary because he was tired. He had lived for eons, fought a multiversal war against himself, and ended up sitting in a lonely castle at the end of time just to keep the peace. He’s a Lord of the Multiverse who is essentially a cosmic janitor. That’s a human angle. It makes the infinite feel small and personal.
Then you’ve got the more nihilistic approach.
Look at Rick Sanchez from Rick and Morty. He’s a Lord of the Multiverse by virtue of his intellect. He can go anywhere, do anything, and replace his family with clones if they get too annoying. The result? He's miserable. When everything is possible, nothing matters. That is the dark side of the trope that resonated so hard with Gen Z and Millennials. It’s "Cosmic Nihilism 101."
The Science (Sorta) Behind the Fiction
While we love these stories, they do lean on some real-ish physics. Well, "real" in the sense that physicists like Hugh Everett III actually proposed the Many-Worlds Interpretation (MWI) of quantum mechanics back in 1957.
Basically, MWI suggests that every time a quantum event occurs, the universe splits. You chose coffee this morning? There’s a world where you chose tea. You decided to read this article? There’s a world where you’re currently wrestling a bear. In this scientific framework, a Lord of the Multiverse would be someone who can perceive the "wave function" of the entire reality.
🔗 Read more: Actor Most Academy Awards: The Record Nobody Is Breaking Anytime Soon
Of course, in real physics, there’s no way to travel between these branches. The math says they are decoherent. They don’t talk to each other. But in fiction, we ignore that because "quantum tunneling" sounds cool and lets Spider-Man meet another Spider-Man.
The Different "Flavors" of Multiversal Lords
Not every ruler of the many-worlds is the same. We can generally break them down into three categories:
- The Administrator: This is your "He Who Remains" type. They want order. They prune timelines like a gardener. They see the multiverse as a chaotic mess that needs a firm hand to prevent total collapse.
- The Consumer: Think Galactus, but bigger. This is an entity that feeds on other realities. In DC’s Crisis on Infinite Earths, the Anti-Monitor was literally eating universes. He didn't want to rule; he wanted to be the only thing left.
- The Chaotic Neutral: This is Q from Star Trek or Mr. Mxyzptlk from DC. They have the power of a Lord of the Multiverse, but they use it for pranks or intellectual curiosity. They are the most dangerous because they are unpredictable.
We also see this in gaming. In Elden Ring, the "Outer Gods" act as multiversal influences vying for control over a single world. They aren't just kings; they are fundamental laws of reality trying to impose their "Order" on everyone else.
The Trouble With Writing "The One"
Honestly, the biggest challenge for writers today is avoiding the "Multiverse Fatigue."
When you introduce a Lord of the Multiverse, the stakes for the "main" characters often feel diminished. If my favorite hero dies, but there are a billion other versions of them, does the death matter? Not really. This is why Spider-Man: Across the Spider-Verse was so clever. It turned the concept of "Canon Events" into the villain. The "Lord" wasn't a person, but the rigid structure of the story itself.
You’ve got to give these characters a weakness that isn't just a bigger punch.
💡 You might also like: Ace of Base All That She Wants: Why This Dark Reggae-Pop Hit Still Haunts Us
In the comics, when Doctor Doom became the "God Emperor" of Battleworld in 2015’s Secret Wars, his weakness was his own insecurity. He had all the power in existence, but he still couldn't admit that Reed Richards was smarter than him. That’s how you write a multiverse ruler. You give them the power of a god and the ego of a toddler.
What's Next for the Trope?
We’re moving toward a "Meta-Multiverse" era.
It’s no longer enough to just have different versions of characters. Now, the Lord of the Multiverse is often used to comment on the franchise itself. When Deadpool enters the MCU, he’s interacting with the "Lord" of that multiverse—the studio executives and the audience’s expectations.
It sounds complicated because it is. We are living in a highly connected, fragmented digital age. Our online lives are a multiverse. You have a LinkedIn persona, a Twitter/X persona, and a real-life persona. You are the Lord of your own digital Multiverse. No wonder these stories resonate.
How to Navigate Multiversal Stories Without Getting Confused
If you're diving into a new series featuring a Lord of the Multiverse, keep these specific markers in mind to understand the "rules" of that specific world:
- Identify the "Anchor": Most multiverses have one "Prime" reality. If you can find the anchor, you can figure out which version of the characters actually matters for the emotional stakes.
- Look for the Cost: Every time someone jumps between worlds or manipulates the timeline, check for the "Incursion" or "Glitch" effect. If there’s no cost, the story probably lacks tension.
- Watch the Background: Creators love hiding Easter eggs. A true multiversal ruler often leaves "marks" across different timelines—specific symbols or recurring names (like "Patches" in FromSoftware games).
- Check the Source: If it's a Marvel property, research the "Living Tribunal." If it's DC, look up "The Presence." These are the ultimate authorities that even the villains are afraid of.
The next time you see a character sitting on a throne made of stars, don't just roll your eyes at the trope. Look at what they represent. Are they a symbol of our desire for control, or a warning about what happens when we get too much of it? Usually, it's a bit of both. Keep an eye on the upcoming slate of cosmic horror films and high-fantasy RPGs; the "Ruler of Everything" isn't going away anytime soon. It's just getting started.