Finding the right locations for winter olympics used to be simple. You just needed a big mountain, a lot of snow, and a city willing to go into massive debt to build some bobsled tracks that nobody would use again. But honestly? Those days are dead.
The International Olympic Committee (IOC) is freaking out. Not because of politics—well, not just because of politics—but because the planet is literally getting too hot to host the Winter Games in most of the places that used to be famous for them. By the time we hit the 2050s, more than half of the previous host cities might not even have enough natural snow to hold a fair competition.
The 2026 Shift: Milano Cortina and the Death of the Single-City Model
We're about to see a massive experiment. In 2026, the locations for winter olympics aren't just one city; it's a whole region of Italy.
Milan is doing the ice stuff—think hockey and figure skating—while Cortina d’Ampezzo handles the alpine skiing. But it’s even more spread out than that. You’ve got biathlon in Anterselva and snowboarding in Livigno. They’re basically using the entire northern half of Italy.
Why? Because building a "cluster" from scratch is a financial suicide mission now.
Italy is basically saying, "Look, we already have these world-class ski resorts, let’s just use them." It’s smart. It’s also kinda chaotic for the athletes who have to travel hours between venues. But if you want the Games to survive, this is the blueprint. They are using 90% existing or temporary venues. That’s a huge deal.
Where We Are Heading: 2030 and 2034
The IOC recently pulled a "double-award" move because they were so worried about finding viable future sites. They gave 2030 to the French Alps and 2034 to Salt Lake City, Utah, all at once.
French Alps 2030: The Four-Cluster Chaos
France is taking the Italian model and cranking it up. They’ve split the map into four zones:
- Haute-Savoie
- Savoie
- Briançonnais
- Nice (Yes, the beach city)
Wait, Nice? For a Winter Olympics?
Yep. Nice is going to host the ice sports. Imagine watching a gold medal hockey game and then walking outside to see the Mediterranean Sea. It sounds weird, but it's the future of locations for winter olympics. You put the snow stuff on the high-altitude glaciers that still have a prayer of staying frozen, and you put the skating in a city that already has hotels and transit.
Salt Lake City 2034: The "Safe" Bet
Salt Lake is the only place right now that feels like a sure thing. They hosted in 2002, and unlike almost every other host in history, they actually kept their venues in great shape. They still use the oval in Kearns for speed skating. They still use the park in Park City.
The IOC loves Salt Lake because it's "climate-reliable." Basically, it’s high enough and cold enough that they aren't worried about the snow melting mid-downhill. Plus, the local population actually wants the Games there, which is becoming a rarity.
✨ Don't miss: Ravens vs Bills 2024: What Really Happened When the King Met the Bills
The Climate Crisis: Why the List is Shrinking
Let's get real for a second. If you look at the 21 places that have hosted since Chamonix in 1924, many are becoming "high-risk."
Researchers like Daniel Scott from the University of Waterloo have been sounding the alarm for years. His data shows that if we don't hit the Paris Agreement targets, only one (Sapporo, Japan) of those 21 previous locations would be able to reliably host the Games by the end of this century.
One.
That’s why you’re hearing talk about a "permanent rotation" of hosts. Instead of picking a new city every four years, the IOC might just pick 5 or 10 "permanent" locations for winter olympics that have the infrastructure and the cold weather, and just circle through them forever. It’s less "new frontier" and more "sustainable survival."
What Most People Miss About Venue Selection
It isn't just about the temperature. It's about the water.
Making artificial snow is an environmental nightmare. For the 2022 Beijing Games, they used an estimated 49 million gallons of water because the region was bone-dry. In Italy for 2026, they are building massive high-elevation reservoirs just to store water for snowmaking.
Critics like Professor Carmen de Jong have pointed out that these reservoirs can wreck local ecosystems. So, while the IOC wants "green" games, the reality of keeping the slopes white is getting browner by the year.
Actionable Insights for the Future
If you're a fan planning to visit these locations for winter olympics or just someone interested in how the world is changing, here is what you actually need to know:
- Book for 2026 Early: Because the venues are spread across Northern Italy, transport will be the biggest headache. Don't just book a hotel in Milan and expect to see skiing; you'll spend six hours on a train.
- Watch the Altitude: Future host bids will favor high-altitude resorts (over 2,000 meters) because lower-elevation resorts (like those in parts of Germany or lower Switzerland) are becoming too risky for snow consistency.
- Expect "Urban" Ice: We will see more "coastal" Winter Olympics where the skating happens in warm cities and the skiing happens hours away. The 2030 Nice/Alps split is the new standard.
- Sustainability is the Filter: If a city proposes building a brand-new sliding center (bobsled/luge), they will likely lose the bid. The IOC is now strictly "use what you have or don't play."
The map of the winter sports world is folding in on itself. We are moving away from the era of "grand new stadiums" and into an era of "make do with what hasn't melted yet." It’s a bit grim, sure, but it’s also forcing the Games to finally be honest about their footprint.
Check the official Olympic site for the specific venue maps of Milano Cortina—they are updated constantly as logistics change for the 2026 cycle.