You’ve seen the LinkedIn posts. Those sleek infographics with a "boss" sitting on a throne while a "leader" pulls the sled with the team. It’s a nice sentiment, honestly. But in the real world—where budgets collapse and people quit because their kid is sick—that distinction is kinda messy.
So, let's talk about leadership in management. It isn't just a buzzword to slap on a performance review. It’s the friction between getting things done and making people feel like they actually matter while doing them.
💡 You might also like: S\&P 500 Yesterday Close: Why the Market is Acting So Weird Right Now
Most people think these are two different jobs. They aren't. If you’re managing a team but nobody is following you because they want to, you’re just a glorified babysitter with a spreadsheet. If you’re "leading" with big visions but the payroll is late and the project deadlines are a fantasy, you’re just a dreamer who's about to get fired.
The Brutal Truth About the Difference
Management is about systems. Leadership is about souls. That sounds dramatic, but think about it. Peter Drucker, the godfather of modern management, famously noted that management is doing things right, while leadership is doing the right things.
Management handles the complexity. It’s the "how." How do we hit this KPI? How do we allocate $50,000 across three departments? It’s the gears. Leadership, though? That’s the "why." It’s the energy that keeps the gears from grinding to a halt when things get ugly.
You can be a manager by title. You become a leader by permission.
I’ve seen managers who were technical geniuses. They could optimize a supply chain in their sleep. But their offices were revolving doors of talent because they treated humans like line items. On the flip side, we've all worked for that "inspirational" manager who gave great speeches but couldn't organize a lunch order. Both are failing at leadership in management. You need the engine and the steering wheel.
Why We Struggle With This Balance
It’s hard. Really hard.
Most companies promote people because they were good at their previous job, not because they can lead. It’s the "Peter Principle" in action. You’re a great coder? Cool, now manage ten coders. Suddenly, your day isn't about Python anymore; it’s about why Sarah and Jim aren't speaking and why the project is three weeks behind.
In a 2023 Gallup study, it was revealed that managers account for at least 70% of the variance in employee engagement scores. That’s a staggering number. It means the "management" part of your job—the schedules, the tasks—is secondary to the "leadership" part—the trust, the psychological safety.
The Myth of the Natural Born Leader
We love the story of the charismatic hero. The Steve Jobs type who walks into a room and everyone just... follows. But leadership in management is rarely that cinematic.
It’s mostly just listening.
Real leadership in a management context looks like:
- Admitting you don't have the answer during a crisis.
- Defending your team from a toxic executive, even if it puts your own neck on the line.
- Changing a process because the person doing the work said it’s broken, even if you spent months designing it.
It's about humility.
The Five Pillars of Leadership in Management
If we strip away the corporate jargon, what are we actually looking at? It’s not a checklist. It’s more of a vibe, but one backed by data and results.
1. Radical Transparency (Without Being a Jerk)
People can smell a lie from three floors away. If the company is having a bad quarter, tell them. Management wants to "massage the message." Leadership tells the truth so the team can help fix the problem. Look at what happened with Buffer. They made their entire salary structure public. That’s a management decision driven by a leadership philosophy of trust.
2. Decision Making Under Pressure
Managers follow the SOP (Standard Operating Procedure). Leaders know when to throw the SOP out the window. During the 2020 lockdowns, the managers who thrived weren't the ones tracking keystrokes. They were the ones who said, "I don't care when you work, just get it done and take care of your family."
3. Empathy as a Performance Metric
This isn't about being "nice." Being nice is easy. Being empathetic is hard. It means understanding that an employee’s low output might be because they’re grieving or burnt out, not because they’re lazy. Kim Scott calls this "Radical Candor"—caring personally while challenging directly.
4. Strategic Vision vs. Tactical Execution
You have to hold both. If you only look at the horizon, you'll trip over the rock in front of you. If you only look at your feet, you'll walk into a wall. Leadership in management is the art of explaining how today’s boring task leads to next year’s big win.
5. Accountability
When the team succeeds, the leader points to the team. When the team fails, the leader points to the mirror. This is the hardest part of the job. It’s easy to blame "market conditions" or "the marketing department." It’s much harder to say, "I didn't give you guys the resources you needed."
Real-World Examples: The Good and the Horrific
Think about Satya Nadella at Microsoft. When he took over from Steve Ballmer in 2014, the culture was famously cutthroat. There were literal cartoons of Microsoft departments pointing guns at each other. Nadella didn't just change the products; he changed the management style. He shifted the focus from "know-it-alls" to "learn-it-alls."
That’s leadership in management. He used his managerial power to enforce a leadership philosophy of growth mindset, inspired by Carol Dweck’s research. Microsoft’s market cap didn't just go up because of Azure; it went up because people weren't afraid to innovate anymore.
Then you have the cautionary tales. Look at the collapse of Enron or the recent struggles at various tech startups where "growth at all costs" was the management style. There was no leadership there, only a blind pursuit of numbers. When leadership is absent from management, ethics usually follow close behind.
The Psychological Safety Factor
Harvard Professor Amy Edmondson coined the term "psychological safety." It’s the belief that you won't be punished or humiliated for speaking up with ideas, questions, concerns, or mistakes.
In a management role, your primary job as a leader is to build this safety.
If your team is afraid of you, they will hide mistakes. Hidden mistakes grow into catastrophes. Therefore, the most "managerial" thing you can do—protecting the business—is actually a "leadership" task: making it safe to fail.
How to Actually Do It (The Practical Stuff)
Stop trying to be a "leader" and start trying to be useful.
Most people overcomplicate this. They buy books. They go to retreats. But honestly? Just do these things:
- One-on-ones are sacred. Don't cancel them. This is the only time your team gets to tell you what’s actually happening. If you cancel your one-on-ones, you're telling your team they don't matter.
- Ask "How can I help?" and mean it. Sometimes the best thing a manager can do is remove a roadblock—clear a bureaucratic hurdle or get a budget approved for a better tool.
- Stop micromanaging. It’s a sign of fear. If you don’t trust your people to do the job, why did you hire them? If you can't trust them, that’s a hiring problem. If you won't trust them, that's a you problem.
- Celebrate the small stuff. Management focuses on the big milestones. Leadership notices the guy who stayed late to help a teammate, even if it wasn't his job.
The Evolution of the Role
The world has changed. The old "command and control" style of management is dying. It worked in factories where the goal was to minimize variance. It doesn't work in a knowledge economy where the goal is to maximize creativity.
Today, leadership in management is about coaching. You aren't the player; you're the person on the sidelines with the clipboard. Your success is entirely dependent on their success. That’s a scary shift for people who like to be in control.
Actionable Steps for New (and Tired) Managers
If you're feeling overwhelmed, start here. Don't try to change the whole department on Monday. Just pick one thing.
- Audit your calendar. How much of your time is spent on "managing" (reports, meetings, emails) versus "leading" (mentoring, strategy, culture-building)? If it's 90/10, you're at risk of burnout and your team is at risk of disengagement. Aim for a 60/40 split.
- Conduct a "Stay Interview." Don't wait for exit interviews. Ask your best people: "Why do you stay here?" and "What would make you leave?" Use that data to lead.
- Define the "Why." Next time you assign a project, don't just give the deadline. Explain who it helps. If you can't find a reason why the project matters, maybe it shouldn't exist.
- Feedback Loops. Create a way for your team to give you feedback anonymously. And here's the key: when they tell you something you don't like, don't get defensive. Thank them. Change something. Show them it’s safe to be honest.
Leadership isn't a destination. It’s a practice. You’ll have days where you’re a great manager but a terrible leader. You’ll have days where you inspire everyone but forget to submit the expense reports. The goal is to keep closing the gap between the two.
Immediate Next Steps:
Identify one recurring meeting that feels like "management theater" and either cancel it or transform it into a collaborative problem-solving session. Then, schedule a 15-minute informal check-in with your quietest team member just to see how they are—no project talk allowed. Observe how the dynamic shifts when you stop being a boss and start being a resource.