San Francisco is a movie town. People here don't just watch films; they treat the act of sitting in a dark room with strangers like a sacred ritual. But if you’ve walked through the Fillmore or the Richmond lately, you’ve probably noticed something is missing. The neon is dark. The marquee letters are gone. Landmark Theatres San Francisco used to be the backbone of the city's indie film scene, but the landscape has shifted so violently over the last few years that the "Landmark experience" is basically down to one remaining outpost: the Embarcadero Center Cinema.
It’s weird. It’s actually more than weird—it’s a localized cultural crisis that most people only talk about in hushed tones over expensive sourdough. For decades, Landmark was the gatekeeper. If you wanted to see a 35mm print of a French noir film or the latest A24 release before it blew up on TikTok, you went to a Landmark house. Now, the company’s footprint in the city has shrunk, leaving a trail of shuttered history and "For Lease" signs that tell a story of rising rents, changing habits, and a corporate tug-of-war.
The Ghost of the Clay Theatre and the Richmond's Loss
Let's talk about the Clay. Honestly, losing the Clay Theatre on Fillmore Street felt like a death in the family for many locals. It opened in 1910. Think about that. It survived the 1918 flu, the Great Depression, and two World Wars, only to be taken down by a combination of high rent and a shift in how we consume "prestige" cinema. Landmark operated the Clay for years, and it was the spot for midnight screenings of The Rocky Horror Picture Show and obscure Japanese animation.
When Landmark pulled out of the Clay in early 2020, just before the world shut down, it wasn't just a business decision. It was a signal. The property was owned by the Balboa Real Estate Investment and Management company, and despite a massive "Save the Clay" campaign, the numbers just didn't work. The theater sat 200 people. In a city where retail space goes for a premium, a single-screen theater is a financial dinosaur. Landmark knew it. The fans knew it. But it still sucked.
Then there was the Bridge Theatre. Tucked away on Geary Boulevard, the Bridge was where you went for the truly bizarre stuff. Landmark gave up the lease there way back in 2012, and it eventually became a climbing gym. It’s a recurring theme. These spaces are being repurposed because "Landmark Theatres San Francisco" as a concept has had to pivot toward luxury and multi-screen efficiency to stay alive. Single-screen venues are beautiful, but they are expensive hobbies for a corporation.
Why the Embarcadero Center Cinema is the Last One Standing
If you want the Landmark experience today, you’re heading to the Embarcadero. It’s hidden. You literally have to navigate the labyrinth of the Embarcadero Center, climb some stairs, and find this sleek, seven-screen subterranean bunker. It doesn't have the historic "soul" of the Clay, but it has something the others didn't: variety and beer.
The Embarcadero survived because it adapted. It has those reclining seats that make you want to nap and a liquor license. More importantly, it has seven screens. In the world of film distribution, having multiple screens is the only way to hedge your bets. If a documentary about a mushroom farmer flops on Screen 3, you can make up the revenue with a buzzy Greta Gerwig film on Screen 1.
- Location: One Embarcadero Center, Promenade Level.
- Vibe: Professional, clean, slightly corporate but still dedicated to "smart" movies.
- The Crowd: Mostly FiDi workers catching a flick after work or serious cinephiles who live in the high-rises nearby.
The Embarcadero is currently the flagship for Landmark Theatres San Francisco, and frankly, it's holding the line. It still gets the limited releases that the big AMC Metreon won't touch. But it feels different. It feels like a boutique experience rather than a neighborhood haunt.
📖 Related: Colin Macrae Below Deck: Why the Fan-Favorite Engineer Finally Walked Away
The Corporate Drama Behind the Scenes
Most people don't realize that Landmark Theatres has changed hands more than a few times. It was famously owned by Mark Cuban and Todd Wagner (the 2929 Entertainment guys) for a long time. They were the ones who pushed the "day and date" release model—showing movies in theaters and on VOD at the same time. This was revolutionary and, to be honest, a bit controversial within the industry.
In 2018, the chain was sold to the Cohen Media Group. Charles Cohen, the billionaire behind it, is a genuine cinephile. He buys up old theaters and classic film libraries. You’d think that would be a match made in heaven for San Francisco, right? Well, it’s complicated. Cohen’s approach has been to focus on high-end, luxury experiences. This often clashes with the gritty, grassroots reality of San Francisco’s independent theater scene.
While the Cohen ownership has kept the brand alive, it hasn't necessarily prioritized reopening the old-school neighborhood houses. The focus is on "quality over quantity." That sounds great in a press release, but for someone living in the Sunset District who just wants to walk to a theater, it means more driving and more expensive parking at the Embarcadero.
The Misconception About "Dead" Theaters
There is this prevailing myth that people in San Francisco stopped going to movies. That’s just not true. Look at the Alamo Drafthouse on Mission or the Roxie. They are packed. The issue isn't a lack of audience; it's a lack of a sustainable business model for the specific way Landmark operated its smaller venues.
Landmark Theatres San Francisco struggled because it occupied a weird middle ground. It wasn't quite "indie" enough to get the non-profit grants that help the Roxie, and it wasn't "blockbuster" enough to compete with the sheer scale of the AMC Kabuki. It got squeezed.
The theaters that are thriving right now are the ones that offer "eventized" cinema. You don't just go to see a movie; you go for a Q&A with the director, a themed cocktail, or a double feature of 1970s horror films curated by a local weirdo. Landmark’s model was a bit more traditional, and in a city with $4,000 rents, "traditional" is a fast track to closure.
What This Means for Local Filmmakers
San Francisco used to be a launchpad. If Landmark picked up your indie doc, you had a shot at an Oscar. The closing of these screens means fewer slots for local creators. When you lose a screen at the Clay or the Bridge, you lose a week of a movie’s life.
👉 See also: Cómo salvar a tu favorito: La verdad sobre la votación de La Casa de los Famosos Colombia
The "theatrical window"—the time a movie stays exclusively in theaters—is shrinking everywhere. But in SF, the physical space is shrinking even faster. This has forced local festivals like SFFILM and CAAMFest to get creative, often hopping between the remaining Landmark screens at the Embarcadero and other independent venues like the Vogue or the Balboa. It’s a scramble.
Surprising Details You Might Not Know
Most people think the theaters just closed because of Netflix. That's a huge oversimplification. At the Clay, for instance, there were massive issues with ADA (Americans with Disabilities Act) compliance. Upgrading a 100-year-old building to modern accessibility standards costs hundreds of thousands, if not millions, of dollars.
For a tenant like Landmark, pouring that kind of money into a building they don't own is a tough sell. For a landlord, it’s often easier to just wait for a retail tenant who will gut the place anyway. This "compliance debt" is the silent killer of historic cinema in San Francisco.
Another factor? The tech. When the industry switched from physical film reels to digital DCPs (Digital Cinema Packages), every theater had to buy $50,000+ projectors. Landmark handled this transition better than most, but it added a layer of debt that made the smaller, one-screen houses even less profitable.
Is There a Future for More Landmark Locations?
Honestly? Don't hold your breath for a new Landmark opening in the Haight or the Mission anytime soon. The company seems content with its current foothold. There were rumors for years about them looking at new developments, but the "retail apocalypse" and the shift in San Francisco's downtown economy have put those plans on ice.
However, the brand still carries weight. If you see the Landmark logo, you know the projection will be centered, the sound will be calibrated, and you won't have to deal with people talking through the movie. It’s a curated experience.
Actionable Insights for the SF Moviegoer
If you actually care about keeping Landmark Theatres San Francisco alive—specifically the Embarcadero—you have to change how you see movies.
✨ Don't miss: Cliff Richard and The Young Ones: The Weirdest Bromance in TV History Explained
Buy your tickets directly. Third-party apps take a cut. If you buy through the Landmark website or at the box office, more money stays with the theater.
Go on Tuesdays. Like most theaters, Landmark usually offers a discount day. It’s the best way to see a high-brow indie film for the price of a burrito.
The "Film Club" is actually worth it. Landmark has a loyalty program. If you're the type of person who sees a movie a month, the points actually add up to free popcorn and tickets fairly quickly. It’s not a scam; it’s a desperate plea for loyalty in an era of streaming.
Support the "Save the... [Insert Theater Name Here]" movements. Even if a theater like the Clay is closed, the fight to keep the building from being turned into a generic pharmacy or condos is ongoing. These buildings are "Landmarks" in more than just name. They are the architectural soul of their neighborhoods.
Check the Embarcadero's "Limited Engagement" list. Often, a movie will play there for one week and then vanish into the digital ether of Apple TV+. If you see something that looks remotely interesting, go immediately. The "wait and see" approach is why these theaters close.
The reality is that Landmark Theatres San Francisco is a smaller, leaner beast than it used to be. It's no longer the sprawling empire of indie cinema that defined the city in the 90s and early 2000s. But the Embarcadero remains a vital organ in the city’s cultural body. Losing it would mean losing the last bridge between the corporate multiplex and the tiny non-profit art house. Use it or lose it—it’s really that simple.