Knicks Celtics Game 1: Why This Rivalry Just Hit a Different Gear

Knicks Celtics Game 1: Why This Rivalry Just Hit a Different Gear

The energy at TD Garden wasn't just loud. It was vibrating. If you’ve followed the NBA long enough, you know that certain matchups feel like a regular Tuesday in November, and others feel like the world is tilting on its axis. The Knicks Celtics Game 1 was the latter. This wasn't just a game; it was a collision of two completely different philosophies of basketball. On one side, you have the Boston Celtics, a well-oiled machine that plays like a futuristic basketball algorithm. On the other, the New York Knicks, a group of guys who basically want to turn every possession into a street fight.

Honestly, the atmosphere felt like 1994, but with better three-point shooting.

People kept talking about the "math problem." That’s the big buzzword in NBA circles lately. The Celtics try to win by simply shooting more efficient shots—layups and threes—than you. It's cold. It's calculated. But the Knicks? They don't care about your math. They care about who wants the ball more when it hits the rim. That tension defined every second of this opener.

The Jayson Tatum Factor and the Knicks Defensive Puzzle

Watching Jayson Tatum in a Game 1 setting is always fascinating because he plays with this sort of calm that borders on indifference, right up until he rips your heart out. In this matchup, the Knicks threw everything at him. OG Anunoby spent most of the night attached to his hip like a shadow.

It didn't always matter.

Tatum has developed this side-step three that is basically unguardable if he’s rhythm. But what really changed the dynamic in this Knicks Celtics Game 1 was how Boston used Tatum as a decoy. When the Knicks sent the double team—which Tom Thibodeau loves to do—Tatum didn't force it. He swung the ball to the corners. That’s where the Celtics' depth really shines. You can’t leave Kristaps Porzingis or Jaylen Brown open just because you're scared of Tatum. It’s a "pick your poison" scenario that feels unfair at times.

The Knicks' defensive rotations were crisp, mostly. But "mostly" doesn't win games in the Eastern Conference playoffs. If you’re a millisecond late on a closeout against Boston, the ball is already through the net.

Brunson's Heavy Lifting

On the other end of the floor, Jalen Brunson was doing Jalen Brunson things. It’s wild to watch a guy who isn't the fastest or the tallest just... manipulate everyone. He uses his posterior better than almost any guard in league history to create space. He’s basically a human bulldozer in a 6'2" frame.

👉 See also: Tottenham vs FC Barcelona: Why This Matchup Still Matters in 2026

In the second quarter, there was a stretch where he scored ten straight points. The Garden went quiet. You could tell the Celtics fans were thinking, Oh no, not this again. Brunson’s ability to get into the paint, stop on a dime, and hit those leaning floaters is what keeps New York in games they have no business being in. He’s the engine. Without him, the Knicks' offense would basically be a bunch of guys standing around wondering who's allowed to shoot.

Rebounding: Where the Knicks Celtics Game 1 Was Won and Lost

If you want to know why the Knicks are even in this conversation, look at the glass. Josh Hart is a 6'4" guard who plays like he’s 6'10". He was flying in from the perimeter to snatch offensive rebounds over Al Horford and Luke Kornet. It’s annoying to play against. It’s demoralizing.

Think about it. You play 23 seconds of perfect defense. You force a contested miss. And then, out of nowhere, a guy in a blue jersey flies in, grabs the ball, and kicks it out for a reset.

That kills a team's spirit.

Boston struggled with this for most of the first half. Joe Mazzulla looked visibly frustrated on the sideline. The Celtics are a great rebounding team when they’re locked in, but the Knicks treat rebounding like a blood sport. Mitchell Robinson—even when he’s not 100% healthy—is a massive human being who just takes up space and creates chaos.

  • The Knicks finished with a significant edge in second-chance points.
  • The Celtics countered with a massive advantage in transition buckets.
  • Total rebounds were close, but the timing of the Knicks' boards kept them alive.

The Three-Point Disparity

We have to talk about the shooting. It's the elephant in the room. The Celtics are built to take 45 to 50 threes a game. If they hit 40% of them, you lose. It’s almost that simple. In this Knicks Celtics Game 1, Boston’s spacing was a nightmare for New York’s traditional drop coverage.

When Porzingis is on the floor, he drags the Knicks' centers out to the logo. That opens up the lane for Jaylen Brown to explode to the rim. Brown’s first step is still one of the most violent things in the NBA. He doesn't just drive; he attacks the basket like it insulted his family.

✨ Don't miss: Buddy Hield Sacramento Kings: What Really Happened Behind the Scenes

New York tried to keep pace. Donte DiVincenzo had a few flurries where he looked like Steph Curry Lite. But the sheer volume of Boston's perimeter attack is overwhelming. It’s like trying to put out a forest fire with a garden hose. You might stop one spot, but three more are popping up behind you.

Coaching Adjustments: Thibs vs. Mazzulla

Tom Thibodeau is a creature of habit. He’s going to play his starters 40+ minutes, he’s going to yell until his voice sounds like sandpaper, and he’s going to demand max effort on every play. It works. It gets the Knicks to play above their talent level.

But Joe Mazzulla is playing a different game. He’s looking at the math. He’s looking at the shot quality. In the fourth quarter of this game, Mazzulla went to a small-ball lineup that forced the Knicks to make a choice: do you keep your bigs in and get roasted on the perimeter, or do you go small and lose your rebounding advantage?

Thibs stuck with his guns.

It’s a philosophical divide. Thibs trusts his players’ grit. Mazzulla trusts the system. In Game 1, the system had just enough answers for the grit.

The X-Factors Nobody Noticed

While everyone was watching Tatum and Brunson, guys like Derrick White were quietly dominating the game. White is the ultimate "glue guy" who actually might be a star in his own right. His shot-blocking—for a guard—is absurd. He swatted a layup in the third quarter that completely changed the momentum.

And then there’s Miles McBride. People forget how important he is for New York’s bench. He provides that spark of energy and point-of-attack defense that allows Brunson to rest for four minutes without the lead evaporating.

🔗 Read more: Why the March Madness 2022 Bracket Still Haunts Your Sports Betting Group Chat

What This Means for the Rest of the Series

Knicks Celtics Game 1 proved that New York isn't going away. A lot of people expected a blowout. They thought the Celtics would just cruise. But the Knicks showed they can hang. They showed that if the game gets ugly—if the referees let them play and it becomes a physical grind—the Knicks have the advantage.

Boston is the better team on paper. They have more talent. They have more ways to score. But the Knicks have more "dawg" in them, to use the current NBA parlance. They thrive in the mud.

To win this series, the Celtics have to stay disciplined. They can't get lured into a 1-on-1 iso battle with Brunson. They have to keep the ball moving. For the Knicks, it’s about health and stamina. Can Brunson and Hart play 45 minutes a night for seven games and still have legs in the fourth quarter? It’s a massive ask.

Actionable Takeaways for Game 2

If you’re betting on this series or just analyzing it for your local bar debate, keep an eye on these three specific things:

  1. The Corner Three: Watch how many times Boston gets an open look from the corner. If that number is over 10, the Knicks are in trouble. New York has to find a way to help on drives without abandoning the corners.
  2. The Free Throw Line: Jalen Brunson needs to get to the line. If he’s not shooting 8+ free throws, it means Boston is defending him without fouling, which usually results in a Celtics win.
  3. Bench Scoring: The Knicks' bench is thinner than Boston's right now. New York needs a "random" big game from someone like Precious Achiuwa or McBride to steal a win on the road.

The series is just getting started, but the blueprint is out there. The Celtics want a track meet; the Knicks want a wrestling match. Whoever dictates the pace of the game for more than 24 minutes is going to be the one standing at the end. Honestly, it’s the best kind of basketball. High stakes, high tension, and two fanbases that absolutely loathe each other.

Make sure to watch the early substitution patterns in the next game. If Thibs goes to his bench earlier than usual, it’s a sign he’s worried about fatigue. If Mazzulla starts doubling Brunson at half-court, it means he’s tired of watching the "Brunson Burner" destroy his drop coverage. Either way, buckle up. This is going to be a long one.