Ridley Scott’s 2005 epic Kingdom of Heaven is a weird beast. If you watched the theatrical cut, you probably thought it was a beautiful but hollow action flick. If you saw the Director’s Cut, you know it’s actually a sweeping, complex masterpiece about faith and failure. But here’s the thing: the Kingdom of Heaven characters we see on screen are often miles away from the real people who lived and died in 12th-century Jerusalem.
History is messy. Hollywood hates messy.
So, Scott and screenwriter William Monahan took real historical figures—knights, queens, and leper kings—and sanded down their edges to fit a modern narrative about religious tolerance. Some characters are almost entirely invented, while others are so different from their real-world counterparts that they might as well be different people. If you’re trying to separate the cinematic myth from the actual crusader history, you’ve got to look at who these people really were behind the chainmail.
Balian of Ibelin: From middle-aged power player to brooding blacksmith
In the movie, Orlando Bloom plays Balian as a grieving French blacksmith who discovers he’s the bastard son of a lord. He goes to Jerusalem to find forgiveness and ends up becoming a reluctant hero.
It's a great "Hero's Journey" trope. It's also mostly fiction.
The real Balian of Ibelin was never a blacksmith. He wasn't a bastard, either. By the time the events of the film take place (the lead-up to the Siege of Jerusalem in 1187), Balian was an established, middle-aged noble born in the Holy Land. He was part of the "Old Guard"—the local aristocracy who had lived in the Levant for generations and actually understood how to negotiate with their Muslim neighbors.
While movie-Balian is a bit of a secular humanist who doubts his faith, the real Balian was a pragmatist. He didn't just stumble into the defense of Jerusalem; he was one of the few high-ranking leaders left after the disastrous Battle of Hattin. Interestingly, the real Balian actually fought against Saladin at Hattin and escaped. He later asked Saladin for safe passage to Jerusalem just to collect his wife, Maria Comnena, and their kids. Saladin agreed, on the condition that Balian wouldn't take up arms against him.
But once Balian got inside the city walls, the people begged him to lead them. He went back to Saladin, basically said, "Look, I have to break my oath because these people need me," and Saladin—being a legend—granted him leave to stay and fight. That's a level of mutual respect you rarely see in war movies.
King Baldwin IV: The tragic brilliance of the Leper King
If there is one character Ridley Scott got mostly right, it’s King Baldwin IV.
🔗 Read more: Love Island UK Who Is Still Together: The Reality of Romance After the Villa
Played by Edward Norton behind a silver mask, Baldwin is the moral center of the film. He’s the dying king trying to maintain a "Kingdom of Conscience" while his body literally falls apart.
Honestly? The real history is even more impressive. Baldwin IV was diagnosed with leprosy as a child. In the Middle Ages, that was a death sentence and a social curse. People thought it was a physical manifestation of sin. But Baldwin was so respected and his lineage so clear that he ruled anyway. He didn't just sit in a palace, though. At age 16, he led a charge at the Battle of Montgisard where his vastly outnumbered forces crushed Saladin’s army.
He had to be helped onto his horse. He couldn't feel his right hand.
The movie portrays him as a peaceful philosopher, but he was a fierce warrior-king out of necessity. By the end of his life, he was blind and couldn't walk, but he still stayed in power to prevent the hawks like Guy de Lusignan from starting a war they couldn't win. When you look at the Kingdom of Heaven characters, Baldwin is the one who feels the most like a genuine hero, both in the script and in the dusty records of the 1100s.
Sibylla: The Princess who wasn't a victim
Eva Green’s Sibylla is a woman trapped in a loveless marriage with Guy de Lusignan, longing for Balian and the freedom to rule. In the film, she eventually cuts her hair, renounces her crown, and heads to France with a blacksmith.
The real Sibylla? She was way more hardcore.
There is zero evidence she ever had a thing for Balian. In fact, she was devoted to her husband, Guy. When the high court of Jerusalem told her they would only crown her Queen if she divorced Guy (because everyone hated him), she agreed—on one condition. She wanted the right to choose her own next husband once she was Queen.
They agreed. They crowned her. She then immediately turned around and said, "I choose Guy."
💡 You might also like: Gwendoline Butler Dead in a Row: Why This 1957 Mystery Still Packs a Punch
It was a massive power move. She wasn't a waif-like victim of circumstance; she was a political player who stayed by her husband even when he lost the entire kingdom. She died of a plague during the Siege of Acre, still trying to reclaim her land. The movie makes her a romantic interest because, well, it’s Hollywood. But the real Sibylla was a woman of agency and iron will.
Guy de Lusignan and Reynald de Châtillon: The ultimate villains?
Every story needs a "bad guy," and Marton Csokas (Guy) and Brendan Gleeson (Reynald) play them with such oily, scenery-chewing perfection that you can't help but hate them.
The film portrays them as religious fanatics who want war for the sake of war.
- Reynald de Châtillon: This guy was actually a nightmare in real life. He really did attack merchant caravans and even launched a pirate raid in the Red Sea, threatening Mecca itself. Saladin personally vowed to kill him, and he kept that promise after the Battle of Hattin. The movie’s depiction of his execution is actually fairly accurate to historical accounts.
- Guy de Lusignan: Guy gets a bit of a raw deal in the film. While he was definitely a weak leader and made tactical blunders, he wasn't necessarily the mustache-twirling villain Scott shows. He was an outsider from France who didn't understand the local politics, which made him easy prey for the more radical factions of the Crusader states.
Saladin: The chivalrous shadow
Ghassan Massoud’s Saladin is perhaps the most beloved portrayal in the film. He’s wise, patient, and deeply honorable.
Does this hold up? Mostly, yes.
Saladin (Salah ad-Din) is one of the few figures from the Crusades who is remembered fondly by both sides. Chroniclers of the time wrote about his generosity. After he took Jerusalem, he didn't massacre the inhabitants—a sharp contrast to the First Crusade, where the streets supposedly ran red with blood. Instead, he allowed many of them to buy their freedom and even let some go for free.
However, we shouldn't forget he was a brilliant and sometimes ruthless military strategist. He was a politician as much as a warrior. His goal was the unification of the Muslim world under the Abbasid Caliphate, and Jerusalem was the ultimate prize. The "peaceful" Saladin of the movie is a bit of a simplification, but his reputation for chivalry is backed up by historical sources like Baha ad-Din ibn Shaddad.
Why the Director's Cut changes the characters entirely
You can't talk about Kingdom of Heaven characters without mentioning the "missing" ones from the theatrical release.
📖 Related: Why ASAP Rocky F kin Problems Still Runs the Club Over a Decade Later
If you've only seen the short version, you missed the entire subplot involving Sibylla’s son, Baldwin V. In the Director's Cut, we find out Sibylla’s son has leprosy, just like his uncle. In a heartbreaking scene, she realizes he’s doomed to a life of suffering and chooses to end his life by pouring lead into his ear.
This changes everything. It explains why she has a mental breakdown later in the film. It adds a layer of tragic desperation to her character that makes her more than just "the love interest."
Then there’s the Hospitaler, played by David Thewlis. He’s a bit of a mystical figure, maybe even an angel or a manifestation of Balian’s conscience. He provides the philosophical weight the movie needs. He represents the ideal of the Crusades—not the land-grabbing or the killing, but the service to the poor and the sick.
The problem with Balian's "modern" morals
One of the biggest critiques from historians is that Balian feels like a man from 2005 dropped into 1187.
He talks about "a kingdom of conscience" and "the walls we build between us." 12th-century knights didn't really think like that. Their world was defined by rigid hierarchy and deep, often violent religious conviction. By making Balian an atheist or an agnostic, the movie loses some of the "why" behind the Crusades.
People didn't walk thousands of miles to fight in the desert because they wanted to build a secular democracy. They did it because they genuinely believed their souls were at stake. By stripping that away, Scott makes the characters more relatable to us, but less authentic to their own time.
How to explore these characters further
If you're fascinated by the real people behind these cinematic icons, don't stop at the credits. The history of the Outremer (the Crusader States) is wilder than any script.
- Read Thomas Asbridge: His book The Crusades is the gold standard for a balanced, exciting look at the era. He gives the Kingdom of Heaven characters the depth they deserve.
- Watch the Director’s Cut: Seriously. If you haven't seen the 194-minute version, you haven't actually seen the movie. The character arcs finally make sense.
- Look into the Siege of Jerusalem: The actual negotiations between Balian and Saladin are recorded in detail. It’s one of the few moments in history where diplomacy actually worked during a massive conflict.
- Research the Order of the Hospital: The "Hospitallers" weren't just warriors; they ran massive hospitals that treated anyone, regardless of religion. It’s a side of the Crusades the movies rarely show.
Understanding these figures requires looking past the Hollywood gloss. The real people were flawed, violent, deeply religious, and incredibly brave. They lived in a world where a skin disease could end a dynasty and a blacksmith (well, a noble) could hold off an empire. The movie gets the "vibe" right, even if it fudges the birth certificates.
To get a true sense of the era, compare the film's ending—Balian returning to his forge—with the reality. The real Balian stayed in the thick of it, helping negotiate the Third Crusade with Richard the Lionheart. He remained a power player until the day he died. He never went back to the "simple life" because, in the 12th century, there was no such thing.
Next Steps for History Buffs:
Check out the primary sources from the era, such as the writings of William of Tyre. He was the tutor to Baldwin IV and provides a firsthand look at the King's struggle with leprosy and the political infighting of the Jerusalem court. If you prefer a more visual deep dive, compare Scott’s version of Saladin with the depictions in Arabic literature to see how a "hero" is constructed differently across cultures.