You probably think you know King Henry V of England because you've seen Timothée Chalamet brooding in a bowl cut or heard a theater actor shout about a "band of brothers." Shakespeare did a real number on Henry's legacy. He turned a cold, calculated, and often brutal administrative genius into a charismatic underdog. But the real story? It’s way more interesting than the play. Henry wasn't just some party boy who suddenly decided to be a good king. He was a man obsessed with a singular, divine right to the French throne, and he nearly broke two kingdoms to get it.
The Wild Prince Myth
Let’s be real: the whole "Prince Hal" persona—the drunken nights at the Boar's Head Inn with Falstaff—is mostly fiction. While it’s true that Henry had some friction with his father, Henry IV, it wasn't because he was a lazy drunk. It was because he was too impatient to lead. By the time he was sixteen, he was already taking an arrow to the face at the Battle of Shrewsbury.
Imagine that. A medieval arrow buried six inches into your cheekbone. He didn't just walk it off. It took the royal surgeon, John Bradmore, to invent a specific tool—a screw-like extractor—to get the arrowhead out without killing him. That's the kind of grit we're talking about. He carried that scar for the rest of his life, a permanent reminder that kingship wasn't a game. It was a bloody, high-stakes gamble.
Why King Henry V of England Obsessed Over France
Most people assume the invasion of France was just a random land grab. It wasn't. Henry honestly believed, with a fervor that bordered on the fanatical, that God wanted him to be the King of France. This wasn't just ego; it was legalism. He spent months digging through old genealogies to justify his claim through his great-grandfather, Edward III.
When the French Dauphin reportedly sent him a box of tennis balls as a snub—implying he was still a child who liked to play games—Henry didn't just get mad. He used it as the ultimate PR spin to go to war.
👉 See also: The Real Story Behind I Can Do Bad All by Myself: From Stage to Screen
The 1415 campaign started messy. Siege warfare is gross, slow, and expensive. At Harfleur, his army was decimated not by French swords, but by dysentery. By the time he decided to march toward Calais, his men were starving, exhausted, and literally dying of the "bloody flux." They were in no condition to fight a superpower.
The Agincourt Reality Check
Agincourt is the big one. It's the moment everyone remembers. But if you look at the tactical breakdown, the English should have lost. Badly.
The French outnumbered them significantly—estimates vary, but it was likely at least 3 to 1. The terrain, however, was a nightmare for heavy cavalry. It had rained for days. The field was a fresh-plowed muddy mess. Henry’s secret weapon wasn't just the longbow; it was the French ego. The French nobility insisted on being in the front rank. They were so packed together in their heavy armor that they couldn't even swing their swords.
- The Stakes: Henry ordered sharpened stakes to be driven into the ground to impale charging horses.
- The Archers: These weren't knights. They were peasants, often fighting in their undershirts because of the heat and the dysentery, raining down 10 to 12 arrows a minute.
- The Massacre: This is the part the movies skip. When Henry feared a French counterattack from the rear, he ordered the execution of thousands of French prisoners. It was a war crime by modern standards, and even his own knights were hesitant to do it because they wanted the ransom money. Henry didn't care. He wanted a win.
The Treaty of Troyes: Almost Winning It All
After Agincourt, Henry didn't just go home and celebrate. He went back to finish the job. He was a master of the "long game." He spent years systematically capturing Norman towns like Caen and Rouen.
✨ Don't miss: Love Island UK Who Is Still Together: The Reality of Romance After the Villa
By 1420, he forced the French King, Charles VI (who struggled with severe mental health issues and believed he was made of glass), to sign the Treaty of Troyes. This was the peak. Henry was declared the heir to the French throne. He married Catherine of Valois to seal the deal. For a brief moment, it looked like England and France would be one single empire under a Lancastrian king.
But history is funny. Henry was thirty-five. He was at the absolute height of his power. And then, he died.
Not in battle. Not from an assassin. He died of dysentery—the same "camp fever" that had plagued his troops for years—just weeks before the French king died. If Henry had lived two more months, he would have been crowned King of France in Notre Dame. Instead, he left his kingdom to a nine-month-old baby, Henry VI, which eventually led to the catastrophic Wars of the Roses.
Why We Still Care Today
The legacy of King Henry V of England is a bit of a double-edged sword. On one hand, he promoted the English language at a time when the elite still spoke French or Latin. He was a "national" king. On the other hand, he was a religious hardliner who burned heretics (like his former friend Sir John Oldcastle) without blinking.
🔗 Read more: Gwendoline Butler Dead in a Row: Why This 1957 Mystery Still Packs a Punch
He was the quintessential professional soldier. He wasn't interested in the trappings of the court; he lived in tents, ate with his men, and obsessed over logistics. He was basically the first modern CEO-General.
How to Learn More About the Real Henry
If you want to move past the Shakespearean fluff, there are a few things you should actually do to understand this guy.
- Read "Agincourt" by Anne Curry. She is the leading expert on the numbers and logistics of the battle. She debunks a lot of the "outnumbered 10-to-1" myths and focuses on the actual military science.
- Visit Westminster Abbey. Henry’s chantry chapel is built right over the ambulatory. You can still see his shield and helmet hanging there. It’s a very deliberate piece of propaganda that he designed himself to ensure he was remembered as a holy warrior.
- Look into the "Great Schism." To understand why Henry was so obsessed with being a "Christian Knight," you have to understand the mess the Catholic Church was in at the time. He saw himself as the man who would unite Europe and lead a new crusade.
- Trace the Lancastrian Line. Look at how his father’s usurpation of the throne from Richard II created a "legitimacy gap" that Henry spent his entire life trying to fill with military glory.
Ultimately, Henry V wasn't a hero or a villain in the way we use those words now. He was a man of his time—ruthless, pious, and incredibly efficient. He proved that a small island nation could punch way above its weight class, but he also proved that building an empire on the back of one man’s will is a recipe for a collapse the second that man stops breathing.
To truly understand British history, you have to look at the "what ifs." What if Henry had lived to forty-five? North America might be speaking a very different dialect, and the map of Europe would be unrecognizable. He was that close to changing everything.