He walks on stage with a crown that looks like it weighs forty pounds. He’s wearing enough red velvet to upholster a mid-sized theater. Then, he starts singing a breakup song. But it’s not a normal breakup song; it’s a breakup song from a monarch to a colony. King George III Hamilton is the comedic relief we all need in a three-hour marathon about Federalist Papers and cabinet battles. Jonathan Groff’s spit-take-inducing performance—literally, the man spits a lot—became an instant meme. However, if you look past the "Da-da-da-da-da," there is a weirdly accurate, almost haunting historical layer to Lin-Manuel Miranda’s version of the "Mad King."
It’s easy to laugh.
The king is basically a toxic ex-boyfriend. He’s possessive. He’s delusional. He threatens to kill your friends and family to remind you of his love. It’s brilliant writing. But why does it work so well? It works because it taps into the actual psychological profile of a man losing his grip on an empire.
The Reality Behind the "You’ll Be Back" Persona
When we talk about King George III Hamilton style, we’re talking about a very specific type of villainy. He doesn’t have a sword. He doesn't even have a rival to argue with face-to-face. He’s isolated. That isolation is the core of his character. In the musical, George only appears in three songs: "You’ll Be Back," "What Comes Next?", and "I Know Him." He never interacts with Alexander Hamilton. He never meets George Washington. He’s stuck in his own world, screaming into the void of the Atlantic Ocean.
Historian Andrew Roberts, who wrote the definitive biography The Last King of America, often points out that George III wasn't the tyrant the Declaration of Independence made him out to be. He was actually a pretty nerdy guy. He loved botany. He loved clocks. He was deeply into agriculture—hence the nickname "Farmer George."
But the musical isn't trying to give you a BBC documentary.
It’s giving you the perception of the King from the American point of view. To the revolutionaries, he was a petulant child. Miranda leans into this by making him the only character who sings in a 1960s British Invasion pop style. While everyone else is rapping or singing R&B, the King is stuck in a Beatles-esque harpsichord loop. It’s a genius musical cue. It shows he is out of step with the "rhythm" of the new world. He’s literally off-beat with history.
Why the Spit Matters (Seriously)
If you saw the filmed version on Disney+, you noticed the saliva. Groff’s performance is notoriously wet. While it started as a physical byproduct of singing with that much enunciation, it evolved into a character trait. It highlights the King’s lack of control. He’s trying to be regal and terrifying, but he can't even keep it together physically.
The real George III suffered from a recurring illness that many historians now believe was bipolar disorder, though for years the "porphyria" theory (a blood disorder) was the leading guess. When he had his "madness" episodes, he would talk until he foamed at the mouth. He would speak for twenty hours straight. By turning the King into a comedic, spitting caricature, the musical subtly nods to the fact that this man was mentally unraveling. It’s dark humor at its best.
"I Know Him": The King’s Reaction to Washington
The funniest moment in the entire show might be the King’s reaction to George Washington stepping down.
"I wasn't aware that was something a person could do."
That line is gold. But it’s also a profound piece of political commentary. In the 18th century, power was something you held until you died or someone killed you. The idea of a peaceful transition of power was alien. King George III Hamilton represents the old world’s total confusion at the American experiment. He’s not just a person; he’s an ancient system of government watching its own irrelevance in real-time.
John Adams, who eventually met the King in 1785 as the first American minister to the Court of St. James’s, found a man who was actually quite dignified and nervous. The King told Adams, "I was the last to consent to the separation; but the separation having been made and having become inevitable, I have always said, as I say now, that I would be the first to meet the friendship of the United States as an independent power."
🔗 Read more: Pippa Tell Me Lies: Why We All Love To Hate Her
That’s a far cry from "I will kill your friends and family to remind you of my love."
But let’s be honest: the musical’s version is more fun. It highlights the absurdity of monarchy. Why is this one guy in charge of a continent he’s never visited? The musical makes him a pop star because kings were the celebrities of their day. They were distant, flashy, and lived in a bubble of their own hype.
The Costume as a Cage
Have you looked at the King’s costume? It’s a masterpiece of design by Paul Tazewell.
While the revolutionaries wear tan, green, and muted wools—clothes you can move in, clothes you can fight in—the King is a statue. He’s encased in gold lace. He can barely move his neck. This visual storytelling is vital. The King is trapped by his own status. He is the most powerful man in the world, yet he’s the only character who stays in one spot. He’s static. The world is moving around Hamilton, Burr, and Angelica, but the King is a fossil.
What Most People Get Wrong About the "Villain" Label
Is he really the villain of Hamilton?
Technically, yes. He is the antagonist of the first half. But the real "villain" of the show is Time. Or maybe Legacy. George III is more like a narrator who doesn't realize he's been fired.
One thing people often miss is how his tone changes. In "You'll Be Back," he's smug. In "What Comes Next?", right after the war is lost, he’s actually quite insightful. He asks the Americans: "Do you know how hard it is to lead?" He’s basically telling the colonies that it’s easy to start a revolution, but it’s much harder to run a post-office and pay off war debts. He’s the voice of cynical experience. He knows that the "young, scrappy, and hungry" kids are about to find out that governing is a nightmare.
And he’s right. The second act is entirely about how hard it is to lead.
Breaking Down the Musicality of George
If you’re a music nerd, listen to the orchestration during the King’s segments.
- The Harpsichord: It’s an instrument of the past. It screams "1700s" in a way that the rest of the score avoids.
- The 3/4 Time: It’s a waltz. It’s dance music for a ballroom, not music for a street fight.
- The "Da-da-da": It’s a nursery rhyme. It infantilizes the most powerful man on earth.
This creates a "uncanny valley" effect. He sounds sweet and bouncy, but the lyrics are about "blood in the streets." That juxtaposition is what makes him so unsettling. It’s the same energy as a horror movie where a creepy music box plays while the monster is lurking.
The Evolution of the Performance
Since Jonathan Groff left the Broadway cast, dozens of actors have taken on the crown. Brian d'Arcy James (who originated the role Off-Broadway), Andrew Rannells, and Rory O'Malley all brought different vibes. Some played him as more "insane," others as more "spoiled brat."
But the "Groffsauce" version remains the blueprint. His ability to stand perfectly still and use only his eyes to convey a looming threat—while looking like a birthday cake—is a masterclass in stage presence. It taught us that you don't need a lot of stage time to leave a massive footprint on a story. You just need a clear perspective.
Why the King Still Matters in 2026
We are still obsessed with the idea of the "Mad King." Whether it's in political commentary or pop culture, the figure of the leader who has lost touch with reality is a recurring nightmare. King George III Hamilton serves as a warning. He is what happens when power is inherited rather than earned. He is what happens when you stop listening to the people you’re supposed to serve.
💡 You might also like: How i could have my gucci on Became the Ultimate Internet Flex
The musical frames the American Revolution not just as a war for independence, but as a divorce from a toxic relationship. When you view it through that lens, the King isn't just a historical figure. He’s every boss who wouldn't let you quit, every partner who tried to control you, and every system that refused to change.
Actionable Insights for Hamilton Fans
If you want to dive deeper into the real history versus the stage version, here are the most effective ways to do it without getting bored by a 900-page textbook:
- Check out the Georgian Papers Programme: This is a massive digital project where they’ve uploaded the King’s actual handwritten letters. You can see his precise, almost obsessive handwriting. It’s a trip to see the "Mad King’s" grocery lists and military orders.
- Watch "The Madness of King George": This 1994 film is still the gold standard for seeing the human side of his illness. It makes you feel for him in a way the musical doesn't quite have time for.
- Listen to the "Hamilton Instrumentals": Specifically, listen to the King’s tracks. Without the vocals, you can hear just how much "old world" harpsichord and strings are layered in there. It’s a completely different vibe than "My Shot."
- Read "The Last King of America" by Andrew Roberts: If you want to see the case for why George III was actually a decent guy who got a bad rap, this is the book. It’s the "rebuttal" to the musical.
The brilliance of the character in Hamilton is that he doesn't need to be historically perfect to be emotionally true. He represents the wall that the revolutionaries had to break through. He represents the weight of the crown. And he reminds us that even the most powerful people in the world are ultimately just humans—sometimes spitting, sometimes singing, and sometimes wondering what the heck just happened to their empire.
To truly understand the show, you have to appreciate the King's loneliness. He is the only character who ends the play exactly where he started. Everyone else changes. Hamilton grows, Burr regrets, Eliza builds. The King just stands there, in his red velvet, waiting for a world that has already moved on.