It sounds like a rejected script from a dystopian dark comedy. But in late 2024, the internet collectively gasped when Lamar Odom, former NBA star and ex-husband of Khloe Kardashian, casually mentioned on a podcast that he’d dropped thousands of dollars on a custom-made silicone companion. Not just any companion. He specifically ordered a Khloe Kardashian sex doll.
People were floored. Honestly, can you blame them?
We live in an era where celebrity culture and personal boundaries are constantly at war, but this felt different. It wasn’t just a tabloid rumor; it was a documented purchase at a high-end facility in Las Vegas. While Odom claimed the move was about "mental health," the public—and Khloe herself—had a very different take on the situation.
The Viral Moment That Creeped Out the Internet
The drama really kicked off when Odom appeared on the We’re Out of Time podcast. He didn't just hint at the purchase; he leaned into it. He talked about how a "sex doll that looks like your wife is about mental health."
Wait, what?
The logic was, to put it mildly, confusing. Most people would agree that when you’ve been divorced since 2016, refers to your ex-wife as your "wife" while buying a $20,000 rubber replica of her is... a lot. TMZ had already spotted him at RealDoll in Vegas, a company famous for hyper-realistic, anatomically correct figures. Reports suggested the doll was being customized with "voluptuous curves" and facial features designed to mimic the Good American founder.
It’s weird. Kinda dark. Definitely headline-grabbing.
✨ Don't miss: Shannon Tweed Net Worth: Why She is Much More Than a Rockstar Wife
Khloe’s Reaction: "Demonic and Unwell"
For a long time, Khloe stayed quiet. She's dealt with a lot over the years—cheating scandals, public breakups, you name it. But when the Khloe Kardashian sex doll news finally hit the screen on the Season 6 finale of The Kardashians in April 2025, she didn't hold back.
She found out the way most of us do: through a Google alert or a stray tweet.
During a conversation with Kris Jenner and Malika Haqq, Khloe described the whole ordeal as "so demonic and unwell." She wasn't flattered. Why would she be?
"I’m supposed to be flattered by this? It’s more—man, this validates just how different we are and how much we’ve grown apart and it’s creepy and it’s weird but I’m not hurt by it. It’s his journey. It’s just weird and gross."
Basically, she was done.
Interestingly, Kris Jenner took a weirdly "zen" approach, joking about it and later saying her New Year's resolution was to be less judgmental. "Lamar, if a blowup doll makes you happy, honey, you go get it," Kris said in her confessional. It was a classic Kardashian moment—half horror, half "get that content."
🔗 Read more: Kellyanne Conway Age: Why Her 59th Year Matters More Than Ever
The Legal and Ethical Grey Area
Is it even legal to make a doll of a real person?
That's where things get murky. By 2026, the laws around "personality rights" and "likeness" have become a massive talking point, especially with the rise of AI and deepfakes. Generally, companies like RealDoll avoid making "celebrity" dolls for public sale because they don't want to get sued into oblivion for violating a star's right of publicity.
However, if a private citizen—even a famous one like Odom—commissions a "custom" doll that happens to look like someone they know, it’s a lot harder to police.
Why this matters for privacy:
- Consent: Khloe never agreed to have her likeness used for a sexual device.
- Commercial vs. Private: Since the doll isn't being mass-marketed as an "Official Khloe Doll," the legal teeth are a bit duller.
- Mental Health Defense: Odom’s use of the "mental health" excuse adds a layer of complexity that makes it a sensitive topic for some advocates, though most experts agree it doesn't excuse the lack of consent.
Why We Can't Stop Talking About It
The fascination with the Khloe Kardashian sex doll isn't just about the "ick" factor. It’s about the total loss of agency. Khloe has spent decades turning her body and her life into a brand. She has carefully curated every image, every outfit, and every business move.
Then, an ex-partner comes along and attempts to "reclaim" her image in a way that is purely for his own gratification.
It feels like a violation. It is a violation.
💡 You might also like: Melissa Gilbert and Timothy Busfield: What Really Happened Behind the Scenes
It also highlights the strange parasocial relationships we have with celebrities. We feel like we "own" a piece of them because we watch them on Hulu every week. But there is a massive line between buying a pair of Good American jeans and buying a life-sized silicone replica of a human being.
Navigating the Future of Personal Likeness
So, where do we go from here?
This isn't just a Kardashian problem. As technology improves, the ability to create 1:1 replicas of anyone—celebrity or not—is becoming easier. We’re seeing more states, like Texas with HB 1443, start to crack down on specific types of dolls, but the "celebrity lookalike" market remains a wild west.
If you're following this story, the best way to stay informed is to look at the evolving legislation around Digital and Physical Likeness Rights.
Protecting your own image is becoming as important as protecting your social security number. If you feel like your likeness is being used without permission—whether in a deepfake video or a physical product—consulting with an intellectual property attorney is the standard first step.
For the rest of us, maybe just stick to the reality show and leave the custom silicone orders in the "bad idea" bin.
Actionable Insights for Navigating Privacy in 2026:
- Audit Your Digital Footprint: Regularly check where your photos are being used. Tools like PimEyes can help you see if your face is popping up in unexpected corners of the web.
- Understand "Right of Publicity": Familiarize yourself with your state's laws regarding your likeness. If someone is making money (or even just gaining clout) off your face or body without a contract, you likely have grounds for a cease and desist.
- Support Consent-Focused Legislation: Follow organizations like the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) that advocate for digital and physical bodily autonomy in the face of rapidly advancing tech.