Kennedy Reinstating HHS Programs: What Most People Get Wrong About the Mistaken Cuts

Kennedy Reinstating HHS Programs: What Most People Get Wrong About the Mistaken Cuts

It was a Tuesday morning when the emails started hitting inboxes, and honestly, it felt like a glitch in the Matrix. Thousands of federal health workers and community grant recipients across the country woke up to "termination" notices. Not just a few—we're talking roughly 10,000 jobs and billions in funding for things like mental health and addiction services.

By Wednesday night, the story shifted. Robert F. Kennedy Jr., now at the helm of the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), began walking some of it back. He basically admitted that in the rush to "drain the swamp" and hit the 80% staff reduction targets set by the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), some massive mistakes were made.

📖 Related: Florida's 8th District: Why the Space Coast is Moving Beyond the Ballot Box

If you've been following the news, you know it's been a whirlwind. People were fired, then told they weren't. Grants were canceled, then "oops, never mind," they were restored. It’s been chaotic, to say the least.

Kennedy Reinstating HHS Programs and the "Always the Plan" Defense

When Kennedy spoke to reporters in Virginia recently, he had a pretty interesting take on the situation. He acknowledged that personnel who should not have been cut, were cut. But then he added a kicker: this was "always part of the plan."

According to Kennedy, when you aim for 80% cuts, you expect to make mistakes on about 20% of them. It's a "move fast and break things" approach applied to the nation's health infrastructure. While that might work for a tech startup in Silicon Valley, it's a lot more complicated when you're talking about the CDC's Lead Poisoning Prevention branch or the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH).

Who actually got their jobs back?

It hasn't been a total reversal, but several key areas saw people returning to work after the initial shock:

👉 See also: October 7th attack video: What Most People Get Wrong About the Footage

  • CDC and NIH: Kennedy told lawmakers that the department brought back over 700 workers at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and more than 200 at the National Institutes of Health.
  • NIOSH: This one was huge. Initially, almost 90% of the staff at the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health—the folks who approve N95 masks and protect miners—were slated for the axe. Just this week, in mid-January 2026, the department reversed course completely for NIOSH, revoking layoff notices for nearly 1,000 employees after a nine-month fight.
  • 9/11 First Responders Program: About 300 people were returned to NIOSH specifically to handle the program that provides care for 9/11 survivors. Apparently, even the most aggressive budget cutters realized that defunding 9/11 heroes was a bad look.

The $2 Billion "Mistake" in Addiction Services

If the job cuts were a mess, the grant cancellations were a full-blown crisis. On January 13, 2026, the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) sent out form letters. These letters abruptly killed nearly $2,000 grants—worth a total of **$2 billion**.

These weren't "administrative bloat" grants. We’re talking about youth overdose prevention, prenatal care for women with addiction, and suicide prevention programs.

The backlash was instant. Everyone from Representative Rosa DeLauro to the American Medical Association (AMA) jumped on it. Within 24 hours, HHS flipped. They sent out a second round of letters saying the first ones were "sent in error" or that the funding was being restored.

For the people running these programs, like Elizabeth Woike at BestSelf Behavioral Health in Buffalo, it was pure whiplash. Imagine having to tell your staff they’re fired on Tuesday, then calling them back on Wednesday to say, "kinda ignore that last email?"

Why the Confusion?

So, how does a department this big mess up this badly? Kennedy and his team point to "siloed HR divisions" and "inaccurate data." Basically, the left hand didn't know what the right hand was doing.

Some staff at the FDA and CDC reported that their layoff notices had the wrong performance ratings or listed offices that hadn't existed for years. One of the weirdest details? Some employees were told that if they had a complaint, they should contact a specific director—who had actually passed away the previous year.

It’s clear the "DOGE" influence is driving a pace that the existing HR infrastructure just can't handle. Kennedy maintains that the goal is to cut the "administrative state" and refocus on primary care, but when you accidentally fire the scientists who approve respirators or the people tracking lead in children's blood, the "efficiency" argument starts to feel a bit thin.

What This Means for You

If you're a healthcare provider or someone who relies on these federal programs, the "all-clear" hasn't exactly sounded yet. Yes, the $2 billion for SAMHSA is back for now, and yes, NIOSH is largely intact. But the atmosphere at HHS is still incredibly volatile.

Experts like Carl Schmid from the HIV+Hepatitis Policy Institute have warned that even if people are reinstated, the "institutional knowledge" is being bled out. When a senior scientist at the FDA is fired and then rehired two months later, they might not come back. They might just go to the private sector.

Actionable Steps for Navigating the HHS Shift

  1. Verify Your Grant Status: if you run a non-profit or health program, don't rely on the first email you get. Check the official HHS and SAMHSA portals daily for "revocation" notices.
  2. Document Everything: If your program experienced a "gap in service" due to these mistaken cuts, document the impact. This data is vital for lawmakers who are currently challenging the legality of these mass RIFs (Reductions in Force).
  3. Watch the Courts: Many of these layoffs are currently on hold or being litigated due to a spring 2025 injunction. The final status of thousands of workers still hangs on what a judge decides about the legality of the "Schedule F" or similar executive actions.
  4. Stay Local: With federal funding feeling like a rollercoaster, many state health departments are trying to build "buffer" funds. Connect with your state’s health commissioner to see what backstops are being put in place.

Honestly, we're in uncharted territory here. Reinstating 20% of a workforce after admitting they were "mistakenly" fired isn't exactly a standard management move. It's a sign of a department trying to rebuild its engine while driving 100 miles per hour down the highway.

Keep an eye on the quarterly hearings Kennedy promised to Congress. Those are going to be the "must-watch" events for anyone trying to figure out if the next round of cuts will be another "oops" or a permanent change to how America handles public health.


Next Steps:

  • Monitor the HHS Press Room for updates on the "Administration for a Healthy America" consolidation.
  • Follow the House Appropriations Committee updates to see if the $2 billion SAMHSA restoration holds through the next budget cycle.