When you talk about Keira Knightley movies Anna Karenina usually tops the list for being, well, polarizing. It’s not just another stuffy period drama where people drink tea in quiet rooms. Not even close. Director Joe Wright basically decided to take one of the most famous novels in history and shove the whole thing onto a literal, decaying theater stage.
It was a big swing. Some people loved the "ballet with words" vibe. Others? They found it super distracting. Honestly, it’s the kind of movie that feels less like a film and more like a fever dream set in 1870s Russia.
The Theater Concept: Why Everything Felt So Fake (On Purpose)
So, here’s the thing. Most people expect a Tolstoy adaptation to have sweeping shots of the Russian tundra. You want the snow. You want the massive estates. But Wright and screenwriter Tom Stoppard had a different idea. They figured the Russian aristocracy of that time was so obsessed with "performing" for each other that they might as well be on a stage.
Almost the entire movie was shot on a single soundstage at Shepperton Studios. It’s a dilapidated theater.
One second, Stiva Oblonsky (played by a very mustache-heavy Matthew Macfadyen) is in an office, and the next, the walls literally slide away to reveal a restaurant. Actors walk through the wings. They climb up into the rafters. It’s weird, but it’s intentional. The only time the camera actually goes "outside" into the real world is when the story follows Levin, the soulful landowner who hates high society.
Does it work?
Kinda. It makes the world feel claustrophobic. You feel like everyone is watching Anna, waiting for her to trip up. But it also creates a distance. It's hard to cry for a character when you can see the stagehands moving a painted backdrop behind them.
👉 See also: Ted Nugent State of Shock: Why This 1979 Album Divides Fans Today
Keira Knightley as Anna: A Different Kind of Heroine
We’re used to seeing Keira Knightley play the plucky, likable lead. Think Elizabeth Bennet in Pride & Prejudice. But her version of Anna Karenina is... difficult. She’s not exactly a victim.
Knightley has talked about how she found Anna "frightening" when she re-read the book as an adult. In this movie, she plays her as manic and deeply flawed. She’s a woman who blows up her life for a guy (Aaron Taylor-Johnson's Vronsky) who, frankly, doesn't always seem worth it.
- The Look: She wears these insane Chanel diamonds and 1950s-inspired couture.
- The Energy: It’s high-strung. Lots of rapid breathing and jagged movements.
- The Backlash: Some critics felt she was too "modern" or "brittle," but others argued she finally captured the narcissism that Tolstoy actually wrote into the character.
If you’re watching Keira Knightley movies Anna Karenina is probably her most "grown-up" performance. She isn't trying to make you like her. She’s trying to show you a woman unraveling.
The Supporting Cast That Almost Stole the Show
While Keira is the center of the storm, the men around her are doing some heavy lifting. Jude Law is almost unrecognizable as her husband, Alexei Karenin. He’s got the receding hairline and the stiff, moralistic posture. Usually, Karenin is the villain, but Law plays him with so much quiet pain that you actually feel bad for the guy.
Then there’s Aaron Taylor-Johnson as Count Vronsky.
✨ Don't miss: Mike Judge Presents: Tales from the Tour Bus Explained (Simply)
He looks like a Ken doll in a white Russian uniform. People had thoughts about this casting. Some felt he was too young (he was only 22 at the time) or lacked the "weight" to be a legendary lover. But Joe Wright wanted that. He wanted Vronsky to look like a "toy boy"—a superficial distraction that Anna mistakes for soul-shaking love.
The B-Plot: Levin and Kitty
While Anna is burning her life down in the theater, Konstantin Levin (Domhnall Gleeson) and Kitty (Alicia Vikander) are out in the actual sunshine. Their scenes are filmed in real locations, which makes their love story feel grounded and "real" compared to the artifice of the city. It’s a neat trick. It tells the audience that while Anna’s world is a performance, Levin’s world is the truth.
The Costumes: Why 1874 Looks Like 1954
If you watch this for anything, watch it for the clothes. Jacqueline Durran won an Oscar for this, and she deserved it.
She didn't stick to 1870s historical accuracy. Instead, she mixed Victorian silhouettes with 1950s Balenciaga and Dior shapes. Why? Because the '50s were also a time of high-glamour performance and rigid social rules.
The black dress Anna wears to the ball is iconic. It’s architectural. It makes her look like a dark bird among a flock of "sour pastel" women. Every outfit is a signal. When she’s happy, the colors lighten. When she starts losing her mind on morphine near the end, her veils get thicker and harder to see through. It's visual storytelling at its best.
🔗 Read more: Big Brother 27 Morgan: What Really Happened Behind the Scenes
Actionable Insights for Your Next Rewatch
If you’re planning to dive back into Keira Knightley movies Anna Karenina hits different when you know what to look for. Don't just watch the actors—watch the background.
- Look at the choreography: The way the clerks stamp papers or how the servants move isn't random. It was all staged by Sidi Larbi Cherkaoui to feel like a dance.
- Notice the sound design: You can often hear the floorboards creaking or the sound of a train whistle even when there's no train in sight. It’s all part of the psychological pressure on Anna.
- Compare the lighting: Notice how the light in the theater scenes is artificial and spotlight-heavy, while the country scenes use natural, soft light.
Basically, stop trying to watch it as a "movie" and start watching it as a piece of performance art. It’s more rewarding that way.
If you want the full experience, watch Joe Wright’s other collaborations with Keira first—Pride & Prejudice and Atonement. You can see how their relationship evolved from "pretty period pieces" to this experimental, risky masterpiece. It’s a wild ride through 19th-century Russia, even if that Russia is mostly made of plywood and paint.
To get the most out of the experience, try reading the first few chapters of the Tolstoy novel before hitting play. It helps you spot which theatrical transitions are based on the book's internal monologues and which are Wright's own inventions. You'll likely find that the "fakeness" of the movie actually mirrors the "fakeness" of the society Anna was trying to escape.