Mrs. Sommers was hungry. Not just for the "mutton chop" she eventually orders at a high-end restaurant, but for a version of herself that had been buried under years of patching old trousers and hunting for bargain-bin sheet music. When we talk about a pair of silk stockings, we aren't just talking about a piece of Victorian hosiery. We’re talking about the moment a person stops being a "mother" or a "provider" and remembers they are a human being with skin that likes the feel of luxury.
It’s a short story. Only a few pages. But Kate Chopin, writing in the late 1890s, managed to nail the exact psychological high of "retail therapy" long before the term existed.
The $15 windfall that changed everything
The story starts with fifteen dollars. In 1897, that was a small fortune for a woman like Mrs. Sommers. It’s roughly equivalent to about $550 today. Most people reading this in a literature class assume she’s poor. She isn't, exactly. Chopin describes her as someone who has "known better days" before she married. She’s "impoverished" in the sense that her life has become a series of tactical maneuvers to save a nickel here and a cent there.
She spends days obsessing over how to use the money. She plans to buy shoes for Janie, gingham for the girls, and gowns for the boys. She is the ultimate selfless parent. Then, she sits down at a counter, exhausted and faint.
Her hand touches the silk.
It’s a physical reaction. Chopin describes the "serpent-like" glide of the stockings through her fingers. It’s tactile. It’s sensual. It is the literal antithesis of the coarse, practical cotton she’s been wearing for years. When she buys a pair of silk stockings, she isn't making a logical choice. She is succumbing to a sensory rebellion.
👉 See also: How is gum made? The sticky truth about what you are actually chewing
Why we get the "Serpent" metaphor wrong
Academic analysis often leans heavily on the "serpent" imagery, linking it to Eve and the Fall of Man. It’s easy to say Mrs. Sommers is being tempted into "sinful" consumerism. But that’s a boring way to look at it. If you’ve ever been burnt out—truly, bone-deep exhausted from caring for others—you know it’s not about sin. It’s about the reclamation of the self.
Chopin was writing during a time when women were the "Angels of the House." Their entire identity was supposed to be a sacrifice. By having Mrs. Sommers spend the money on herself—moving from the stockings to fitted gloves, then to high-end magazines, a lavish meal, and finally a theater ticket—Chopin is documenting a breakdown of the social contract.
She’s not a "bad mother." She’s a person who realized that fifteen dollars couldn't fix her children's lives, but it could briefly fix her soul.
The sheer physics of the impulse buy
Ever walked into a store for milk and left with a $40 candle? That’s the Mrs. Sommers effect.
The story moves fast. The pacing mirrors her spending. Once she puts on the stockings, the rest of the day happens in a blur of escalating luxury.
✨ Don't miss: Curtain Bangs on Fine Hair: Why Yours Probably Look Flat and How to Fix It
- She goes to the shoe department and gets fitted. Not just "buying shoes," but being served.
- She buys "two high-priced magazines." These were the status symbols of the era, the Vogue or New Yorker of the 1890s.
- She eats a lunch that includes wine and Roquefort cheese.
The Roquefort is a tiny detail that matters. It’s an acquired, expensive taste. It’s a bold choice for a woman who usually eats leftovers.
The tragedy of the cable car
The ending of a pair of silk stockings is one of the quietest, most devastating moments in American literature. Mrs. Sommers is on the cable car heading home. The "dream" is over. Chopin writes about a man sitting opposite her who sees a "plain, ordinary-looking woman." He has no idea that she has just spent a small fortune on a day of total self-indulgence.
She wishes the cable car would never stop. She wishes it would just keep going, carrying her away from the "patching and the scouring" forever.
There is no "lesson" here. Chopin doesn't punish her. She doesn't have Mrs. Sommers go home to find her children sick or the house on fire. The "punishment" is simply the return to reality. The stockings will eventually snag. The silk will wear thin. The fifteen dollars are gone.
What this tells us about modern "Treat Yourself" culture
We live in an era of dopamine hits. We scroll, we click "Add to Cart," and we feel a momentary surge. But Mrs. Sommers' experience was different because it was so rare.
🔗 Read more: Bates Nut Farm Woods Valley Road Valley Center CA: Why Everyone Still Goes After 100 Years
In the 1890s, women’s clothing was a cage. Corsets, heavy skirts, layers of petticoats. Silk was the only thing that felt like freedom against the skin. Today, we have constant access to cheap luxury, which arguably cheapens the experience. When Mrs. Sommers bought those stockings, she was performing a radical act of autonomy.
Actionable insights for the modern reader
If you’re revisiting this story or feeling the "Sommers itch" in your own life, there are a few things to keep in mind regarding the psychology of luxury and self-care.
- Audit your "Selfless" habits. Mrs. Sommers snapped because she had nothing left for herself. True "care" shouldn't require a total psychological break to justify a purchase.
- Invest in tactile quality. The stockings mattered because they felt different. If you're going to splurge, choose things that have a physical impact—natural fibers, better food, actual experiences—rather than digital clutter.
- Acknowledge the "After-Drop." The sadness Mrs. Sommers feels on the cable car is a real thing. High-intensity spending leads to a crash.
- Read the source material. Kate Chopin’s The Awakening gets all the glory, but "A Pair of Silk Stockings" is a tighter, more relatable look at the exact same themes of female entrapment.
The story reminds us that luxury isn't always about vanity. Sometimes, it's a desperate attempt to remember that you exist outside of your responsibilities. Mrs. Sommers wasn't buying hosiery; she was buying a few hours of being someone who mattered.
To truly understand the impact of this narrative, one should look at the historical context of the 1890s economic depression. Mrs. Sommers' fifteen dollars wasn't just "extra" money; it represented a massive opportunity cost in a time of extreme financial instability for the middle class. Her choice was a defiance of the entire economic pressure of her era.
Keep an eye on the small luxuries in your own life. Are they bridges to your identity, or just distractions? Mrs. Sommers found a bridge, even if it only led to a theater and a nice lunch.