Wait. Stop. Before you read another headline about Karen Read, you need the actual timeline. There’s been a ton of noise. Most of it is just people yelling on X (formerly Twitter) or TikTok creators trying to go viral. But the reality of what went down during that high-stakes Karen Read interview after the Super Bowl is much more calculated than most people think.
It was February 9, 2025. Super Bowl Sunday. While the rest of the world was focused on the game, Boston 25 News dropped a bombshell. Ted Daniel sat down with Read for an exclusive, one-on-one interview that changed the energy of the entire case.
Why the Timing Mattered
Honestly, it was a genius PR move. Or a desperate one, depending on who you ask. By airing the interview right after one of the biggest television events of the year, Read and her legal team ensured that her face—and her side of the story—was fresh in the minds of potential jurors just months before her retrial was set to begin in April 2025.
She didn't just talk. She drove.
In the second part of the interview, released later in February, Read actually got behind the wheel. She drove through the streets of Boston, passing her old office at Fidelity Investments. It was weirdly personal. She talked about nightmares. She talked about the $5 million she owed in legal fees. It wasn't the polished, robotic defense you usually see in murder cases. It was raw. And for a lot of people, it was convincing.
📖 Related: Trump New Gun Laws: What Most People Get Wrong
The "I've Been Framed" Narrative
If you've followed this case at all, you know the "frame job" is the heart of the defense. During the Karen Read interview after the Super Bowl, she didn't mince words. "I picture every day that they're working on framing me," she told Daniel.
She looked straight into the camera. No blinking. No hesitation.
Key Takeaways from the Discussion:
- The "Lexus Evidence": Read addressed the Commonwealth's theory that she hit John O’Keefe with her SUV. She pointed to federal materials that she claimed "diametrically opposed" the state's theory.
- Financial Strain: She admitted to being millions of dollars in debt. Her defense fund had raised about $750,000, but in a case this big, that's basically pocket change.
- The O’Keefe Family: This was the part that got people heated. Read admitted that she "almost looks through" John’s family in court. She said she deletes messages from them immediately. To some, it looked cold. To others, it looked like a woman who had completely detached from a toxic situation to survive.
The Verdict and the 2026 Reality
Fast forward to today, January 2026. Looking back, that post-Super Bowl interview was a massive turning point. It set the stage for her June 2025 retrial where, in a move that shocked many but relieved her "Free Karen Read" supporters, she was found not guilty of second-degree murder and manslaughter.
She didn't walk away totally free, though. The jury still got her for driving under the influence.
👉 See also: Why Every Tornado Warning MN Now Live Alert Demands Your Immediate Attention
But the murder charges? Gone.
The interview served as a public "testimony" before she ever stepped back into that Dedham courtroom. It allowed her to humanize herself. She wasn't just a defendant in a suit; she was a woman who "doesn't remember the last time she did anything but tip a waiter" because people keep buying her meals in support.
What's Happening Right Now (January 2026)
Just this month, on January 6, 2026, Read was back in court. Not for murder, but for the wrongful death lawsuit filed by the O’Keefe family.
It never ends.
✨ Don't miss: Brian Walshe Trial Date: What Really Happened with the Verdict
She’s also fighting back. Read has filed her own lawsuits against law enforcement members, including the now-fired Trooper Michael Proctor. Remember him? The guy whose "disturbing" texts about Read basically blew up the prosecution's credibility during the first trial? Yeah, he’s still a central figure in this legal mess.
Why People Are Still Obsessed
Basically, this case has everything. Mystery. Accusations of a "thin blue line" cover-up. A dead police officer. A high-profile woman who refuses to stay quiet.
Most defendants are told by their lawyers to shut up. Read did the opposite. She went on 20/20. She did Vanity Fair. She sat down for hours with Boston 25.
She bet on the public. And in terms of the criminal trial, that bet paid off.
Actionable Insights for Following the Case in 2026:
- Watch the Civil Filings: The wrongful death suit is where the new evidence is coming out. Specifically, look for the internal records of the Canton Police Department that Read’s team is currently trying to unseal.
- Monitor the Federal Investigation: The FBI’s involvement in investigating the local police’s handling of the case is still the "X-factor" that could lead to more indictments of law enforcement.
- Ignore the Noise: Don't get all your news from TikTok clips. Go back to the source documents. The "extended cut" of her interviews often contains nuances that the 30-second clips leave out.
The Karen Read interview after the Super Bowl wasn't just a news segment; it was a tactical strike. It showed a woman who wasn't afraid of the stand or the spotlight. Whether you believe she's a victim of a massive conspiracy or a lucky defendant who played the media perfectly, you can't deny that she changed the rules of how high-profile criminal defense works in the digital age.
Follow the current civil hearings in Plymouth Superior Court to see if the "frame job" theory holds up under the lower burden of proof required in civil court. This story is far from over.