Ever heard of a book so "dangerous" it got its author locked in an asylum for the last decade of his life? That’s basically the legacy of Juliette by Marquis de Sade. Honestly, if you mention the Marquis today, most people think of "sadism" and leave it at that. They assume it's just old-school smut. But Juliette isn't just a spicy 18th-century novel. It is a massive, four-thousand-page middle finger to every moral, religious, and social rule ever written.
It’s dark. It’s dense. And, frankly, it’s kind of exhausting.
The story follows Juliette, an amoral, successful, and—let’s be real—completely sociopathic woman who decides that being "good" is for losers. While her sister Justine (the star of Sade’s other famous book) tries to be a saint and gets treated like a human doormat, Juliette embraces vice and ends up rich, powerful, and hanging out with the Pope. It’s a cynical "what if" that still manages to make modern readers squirm.
👉 See also: Does John Winchester Come Back: What Really Happened with Jeffrey Dean Morgan's Return
The Anti-Heroine Who Won
Most stories from the 1700s have a predictable arc. The hero does something bad, feels guilty, and eventually finds redemption. Or they’re a pure soul who overcomes evil. Juliette Marquis de Sade flips that script and sets it on fire.
Juliette starts in a convent, which is where Sade loves to begin his stories because he had a massive bone to pick with the Church. At thirteen, she’s basically told by an Abbess that God is a myth and the only thing that matters is her own pleasure. Instead of being horrified, Juliette goes, "Cool, makes sense," and spends the next twenty years climbing the social ladder by being the most ruthless person in the room.
She doesn't just survive; she thrives.
She travels across Europe, meets kings and queens, and joins a secret "Society of the Friends of Crime." While her sister Justine is being struck by lightning after a life of misery (no joke, that’s how her story ends), Juliette is living her best life. It’s a brutal commentary on the idea that "good things happen to good people." Sade’s world is a place where the shark eats the minnow every single time, and Juliette is the biggest shark in the ocean.
Why This Book Is More Than Just "Porn"
If you tried to read Juliette for the "plot" in a traditional sense, you’d probably give up by page fifty. The book is structured in a way that feels totally alien to modern readers. You get a graphic, violent scene, followed by fifty pages of dense philosophical rambling about why nature loves destruction. Then another scene. Then another lecture.
It’s repetitive. It’s relentless.
Critics like Theodor Adorno and Max Horkheimer actually looked at Juliette as a symbol of the Enlightenment gone wrong. They argued that if you take cold, hard logic to its extreme—stripping away all "superstition" like empathy or morality—you end up with Juliette. She is "reason" without a heart.
The Philosophy of "The Strong"
Sade’s characters are basically mouthpieces for his own beef with the world. He spent about 30 years of his life in prison, so he had a lot of time to get bitter. In Juliette, he argues:
- Nature is Cruel: Look at a forest. Things eat each other. Why should humans be different?
- Religion is a Shackle: He viewed the Church as a tool used by the weak to control the strong.
- Pity is a Weakness: To Juliette, feeling bad for someone else is just a sign that you haven’t fully embraced your own freedom.
Honestly, it’s kind of the 18th-century version of an "edgelord" manifesto, but written by a guy with a genius-level intellect and a very dark imagination. He wasn't just trying to gross people out; he was trying to prove that the "social contract" we all live by is a total lie.
The Real-Life Consequences
Napoleon Bonaparte wasn't a fan. When the final version of the Justine/Juliette series was published anonymously in the late 1790s, Napoleon was so offended by the portrayal of the government and the Church that he ordered the author’s arrest.
Sade was picked up in 1801 at his publisher's office. He spent the rest of his life in the Charenton asylum. He never even admitted to writing the books, but everyone knew. They were the "forbidden" texts of the century. Even today, you won't find Juliette on most "Must Read" lists unless you're in a specialized literature program.
Juliette vs. Modern Culture
It’s weirdly ironic that Juliette is often labeled as "feminist" by some modern critics, like Camille Paglia or Angela Carter. They argue that even though she’s a monster, she’s one of the first female characters in history who has 100% agency. She isn't a victim. She isn't waiting for a prince. She decides what she wants and she takes it.
Is she a role model? Absolutely not. But in the context of 1797, a woman who out-muscles and out-thinks every man she meets was a radical concept.
What You Should Know Before Diving In
If you’re actually thinking about reading it, be warned: it’s not a fun weekend read. It is "fractal" literature. Whether you read ten pages or a thousand, the message is the same. It’s a whirlpool of depravity and philosophy that never ends.
- Check the translation: The Austryn Wainhouse translation is the gold standard for English readers.
- Context is key: Don't read it as a novel; read it as a historical artifact of a man who was losing his mind in a prison cell.
- Skip the "lectures": If the 30-page rant about why murder is natural starts to bore you, you aren't alone. Even 18th-century readers skipped those parts.
Basically, Juliette is the shadow side of the French Revolution. It’s what happens when the cry for "Liberty" is taken to its most extreme, darkest conclusion. It reminds us that total freedom—without any responsibility to others—isn't a utopia. It’s a nightmare.
If you want to understand the history of transgressive art, you kind of have to know about Juliette. Just don't expect a happy ending. Or a sane one.
Your Next Step: If you're interested in the darker side of literature but Juliette sounds too heavy, try reading The Sadeian Woman by Angela Carter. It’s a much shorter, brilliant analysis of why Sade’s female characters actually matter in the history of feminism. It’ll give you the "expert" take without having to slog through four thousand pages of 18th-century rants.