When Julia Gillard stood up in the House of Representatives on October 9, 2012, she wasn't planning on becoming a global viral sensation. Honestly, she was just fed up. She had a folder full of notes, a simmering "murderous rage" (her words, later on), and a target: Tony Abbott.
The "Misogyny Speech" is what most people remember. It’s the clip that still loops on TikTok and gets taught in university gender studies units from Harvard to Oxford. But if you think Gillard’s time as Prime Minister was just one long battle against sexism, you're missing the most interesting part of the story.
She ran a minority government. A "hung parliament." Basically a political nightmare.
And yet, her government passed more than 500 pieces of legislation. That is a staggering number for a leader who had to fight for every single vote on the floor of the House. We’re talking about massive, nation-shifting stuff like the National Disability Insurance Scheme (NDIS) and the Gonski education reforms.
The Minority Government Myth
Most political commentators at the time said she wouldn't last a year. The 2010 election was a mess. Labor and the Coalition were locked at 72 seats each. Gillard had to spend seventeen days in high-stakes negotiations with three independents and a Greens MP to squeeze out a 76-74 majority.
It was a razor-thin margin. If one person got stuck in traffic or had a bad case of the flu, the government could have collapsed.
Despite that, she was a legislative machine. You've probably heard people call her a "backroom dealer," but in the context of a minority government, that’s actually a compliment. It means she knew how to count. She knew how to trade. She was an expert negotiator who understood that in politics, you don't get 100% of what you want; you get what you can pass.
👉 See also: What Really Happened With the Women's Orchestra of Auschwitz
The NDIS and Gonski: Legacy or Liability?
The National Disability Insurance Scheme is perhaps the most significant social reform in Australia since Medicare. Before the NDIS, support for people with disabilities was a "lottery" of state-based grants. Gillard pushed this through when her political capital was at its lowest.
Then there was the Gonski Report. This was meant to fix the "zip code" effect in Australian schools—the idea that your success in life shouldn't depend on how wealthy your neighborhood is. While the full vision of Gonski has been watered down by successive governments, the "needs-based funding" model she introduced remains the benchmark for the debate.
Why the "Carbon Tax" Almost Destroyed Her
You can't talk about Julia Gillard without talking about the "Ju-Liar" campaign. It’s the shadow that followed her every move.
Before the 2010 election, she famously said, "There will be no carbon tax under the government I lead." Then, to form government with the Greens, she agreed to a carbon price. To her critics, it was the ultimate betrayal. To her supporters, it was a necessary compromise to address climate change.
Politically? It was a disaster.
Tony Abbott, then the Opposition Leader, was a master of the "three-word slogan." He hammered "Stop the Tax" until it was ringing in everyone’s ears. Even though the policy was technically an emissions trading scheme with a fixed-price period, the "tax" label stuck.
✨ Don't miss: How Much Did Trump Add to the National Debt Explained (Simply)
Revenue was down. The budget surplus she promised never materialized. People were angry about electricity bills. It didn't matter that the economy was actually doing okay compared to the rest of the world post-GFC. The narrative was set: she had lied.
The Misogyny Speech: Putting It Back in Context
Here is the thing about that 15-minute speech: it wasn't about her feeling "hurt."
The trigger was a motion by Tony Abbott to remove Peter Slipper as Speaker of the House. Slipper had been caught sending some pretty vile, sexist text messages. Abbott was attacking Gillard for supporting Slipper.
Gillard’s response was a masterclass in "naming and shaming." She didn't just defend herself; she flipped the script. She read back Abbott’s own past comments—like when he asked if it was a "bad thing" that men have more power than women, or his "physiology or temperament" comments.
"I will not be lectured about sexism and misogyny by this man. I will not. And the Government will not be lectured about sexism and misogyny by this man. Not now, not ever."
That line changed the way Australians talked about gender in the workplace. It forced the Macquarie Dictionary to actually change its definition of "misogyny" to include "entrenched prejudice against women," not just "hatred."
🔗 Read more: The Galveston Hurricane 1900 Orphanage Story Is More Tragic Than You Realized
Life After the Lodge: Where is She Now?
Since losing the leadership back to Kevin Rudd in 2013, Gillard hasn't pulled a "Rudd" or an "Abbott." She didn't hang around Parliament House being a "ghost" for the next guy. She left.
She basically reinvented herself as a global stateswoman.
- Global Institute for Women’s Leadership: She founded this at King’s College London (and now ANU) to study why women still aren't getting the top jobs.
- Wellcome: She chairs this massive global health foundation. We're talking about billions of dollars in funding for mental health and infectious diseases.
- The Energy Transition: More recently, she's moved into the private sector, chairing HMC Capital’s energy transition platform.
It’s a bit ironic. The woman who was nearly taken down by a "carbon tax" is now helping lead the investment into wind and solar technologies.
What Can We Learn From the Gillard Years?
Looking back, the Gillard era was a "perfect storm." It was the intersection of a hung parliament, a bitter internal rivalry with Kevin Rudd, and a media landscape that wasn't quite sure how to handle a female leader who didn't have children and lived with a partner (Tim Mathieson) she wasn't married to.
She wasn't perfect. Her stance on same-sex marriage was criticized by her own side for years—she argued for "traditional" marriage while being a non-religious woman who didn't believe in the institution for herself. It was a weird, contradictory position that many felt was a political calculation that backfired.
But if you’re looking for a lesson in resilience, she’s the blueprint. She took hits that would have ended most careers in a week and she kept the wheels of government turning for three years.
Actionable Insights from the Gillard Era
If you're interested in the mechanics of power or the history of Australian politics, here is how you can actually apply the "Gillard method" or learn more:
- Study the "Negotiation of 2010": If you work in management or law, read the formal agreements Gillard signed with Wilkie, Oakeshott, and Windsor. It is a masterclass in how to find common ground when nobody agrees.
- Watch the Misogyny Speech in Full: Don't just watch the 30-second clip. Watch the full 15 minutes. Notice how she uses "The Leader of the Opposition" as a repetitive hammer. It’s a lesson in rhetorical framing.
- Read "My Story": Her autobiography is surprisingly candid about the "murderous rage" she felt. It provides a rare look at the mental toll of high-level political combat.
- Follow the Global Institute for Women’s Leadership: They regularly publish data-driven reports on the "gender pay gap" and "leadership barriers" that go beyond the usual talking points.
Julia Gillard’s time as Prime Minister ended in a room full of people who had mostly already decided to move on. But her policies—especially the NDIS—are now so woven into the fabric of Australian life that even her fiercest enemies wouldn't dare touch them. That, more than any speech, is the real measure of her time in office.