Steven Spurrier wasn't trying to start a revolution. He was just a British guy running a wine shop in Paris who wanted to drum up some business. He figured a little publicity stunt—pitting those scrappy California upstarts against the legendary titans of Bordeaux and Burgundy—would be a fun afternoon. Maybe sell a few more bottles. Instead, he accidentally broke the wine world. He shattered the myth of French invincibility forever. Honestly, if you look at the judgment of paris wine event from the perspective of the French judges involved, it was a total disaster they spent decades trying to live down.
The setup was simple. It was May 24, 1976. The venue was the InterContinental Hotel in Paris. Nine judges, all French, all top-tier experts, sat down to taste white and red wines. They didn't know which was which. They assumed they'd easily spot the "unrefined" American swill and heap praise on the French masterpieces.
They were wrong.
The Day California Shocked the World
Imagine the scene. You have icons like Odette Kahn, editor of the Revue du vin de France, and Christian Vannequé, the sommelier at Tour d’Argent. These people lived and breathed terroir. They believed, fundamentally, that great wine could only come from French soil. When the white wines were poured, the results were a literal gut-punch to the establishment.
A 1973 Chateau Montelena Chardonnay, crafted by Mike Grgich in the Napa Valley, took the top spot. It didn't just win; it beat out Meursault-Charmes and Beaune Clos des Mouches.
The room went quiet. But the reds were still coming. Surely, the French thought, the Cabernet-based blends from Bordeaux would save their honor. After all, Bordeaux is the king of reds. But when the scores were tallied for the red flight, the 1973 Stag’s Leap Wine Cellars S.L.V. Cabernet Sauvignon, made by Warren Winiarski, had edged out Château Mouton-Rothschild and Château Haut-Brion.
George Taber was there. He was the only journalist who bothered to show up, representing TIME magazine. He watched the judges' faces turn to stone as they realized they had given the highest marks to wines from a place they barely considered a serious viticultural region. One judge even tried to get her ballot back. Spurrier refused.
📖 Related: Is there actually a legal age to stay home alone? What parents need to know
Why the Results Weren't Just a Fluke
People love to say the judgment of paris wine was a one-off. They argue the French wines were "too young" and hadn't opened up yet, while the California wines were "showy" and designed for immediate impact. It’s a classic cope.
But here’s the thing: California’s win wasn't about luck. It was about a shift in how wine was being made. While Europe was tied to tradition—sometimes to a fault—California winemakers were experimenting with temperature-controlled fermentation, cleaner cellar practices, and precise harvesting.
Take the 1973 Chateau Montelena. Mike Grgich was obsessed with the chemistry of the grapes. He wasn't just "letting nature take its course." He was intervening where it mattered to ensure the fruit stayed bright and the acidity remained crisp. In the mid-70s, many French Chardonnays were suffering from inconsistent cellar hygiene or over-oxidized styles. The clean, vibrating energy of the Napa Chardonnay felt like a revelation to judges who, deep down, knew quality when they tasted it—even if they hated where it came from.
The reds told a similar story. The Stag’s Leap S.L.V. was elegant. It wasn't a "fruit bomb." It had structure and restraint. It proved that Napa wasn't just a hot desert making jammy juice. It was a world-class terroir capable of producing sophisticated, age-worthy Cabernet.
The Long-Term Fallout for the Wine Industry
The impact was immediate and massive. Before 1976, if you saw a bottle of wine from California, Australia, or Chile on a high-end menu, you probably laughed. Afterward? Everything changed.
- Investment poured into Napa. Suddenly, the valley wasn't a sleepy agricultural backwater. It was a gold mine.
- The "New World" was born. Winemakers in the Southern Hemisphere realized that if California could beat the French, they could too.
- The French got better. This is the part people miss. The loss forced French estates to stop resting on their laurels. They improved their own techniques because they realized they had competition.
It's kinda funny how much the French hated the result. Odette Kahn actually demanded her notes back and later wrote a scathing article suggesting the tasting was rigged or fundamentally flawed. She couldn't reconcile her palate's honesty with her national pride.
👉 See also: The Long Haired Russian Cat Explained: Why the Siberian is Basically a Living Legend
Testing the "Age" Theory: The Rematches
The most common criticism of the judgment of paris wine was that French wines are built for the long haul, while American wines fall apart after a decade. So, they tested it. Again and again.
In 1986, and then most famously on the 30th anniversary in 2006, the same vintages were tasted again. If the "longevity" argument held water, the French wines should have crushed the Americans after 30 years of aging.
They didn't.
In the 2006 tasting, organized again by Spurrier, the 1971 Ridge Monte Bello Cabernet Sauvignon took the top spot. The original winner, Stag's Leap, stayed in the top group. The California wines had aged beautifully, proving that the high-quality fruit and balanced chemistry of the 1970s Napa era were more than capable of standing the test of time. It basically put the final nail in the coffin of the idea that California wine was just a "flash in the pan."
What Most People Get Wrong About the Tasting
You’ll often hear that this event "made" Napa Valley. That’s mostly true, but it also nearly ruined some of the people involved. Mike Grgich, for instance, was working for Jim Barrett at Montelena. The win brought fame, but it also brought immense pressure. Barrett and Grgich eventually went their separate ways, with Grgich starting his own iconic label, Grgich Hills.
Also, it wasn't just about "better" or "worse." It was about the democratization of taste. The judgment of paris wine proved that you didn't need a thousand-year-old pedigree to make something sublime. You needed good land, technical skill, and the guts to put your product in a glass next to a legend.
✨ Don't miss: Why Every Mom and Daughter Photo You Take Actually Matters
There’s also a common misconception that the French wines were "bad" that day. They weren't. They were excellent. The scores were incredibly close. The real story isn't that France failed; it's that California arrived.
How to Taste the Legend Today
You can't go out and buy a 1973 Chateau Montelena or Stag’s Leap for fifty bucks. Those bottles are museum pieces now. One of them is literally in the Smithsonian National Museum of American History. That’s how much this matters.
But you can still drink the lineage. If you want to understand the "Paris style," look for producers who prioritize balance over sheer power.
- Chateau Montelena: They still make their Chardonnay in a way that honors that 1973 win—minimal malolactic fermentation, lots of acidity, very little "butter."
- Stag’s Leap Wine Cellars: Look for the "Artemis" for a gateway, but the "S.L.V." is the direct descendant of the winner.
- Ridge Monte Bello: Often considered the greatest Cabernet-based wine in America. It proved its dominance in the 2006 rematch.
Actionable Steps for Wine Lovers
If you want to dive deeper into this history, don't just read about it. Experience the contrast.
- Host your own "Judgment" night. Buy a high-end California Chardonnay (look for something from the Santa Cruz Mountains or a cooler part of Napa) and a French Chablis or Meursault of similar price. Wrap them in foil. Taste them. Be honest with yourself.
- Watch the movies, but with a grain of salt. The film Bottle Shock is fun, but it’s mostly fiction. It gets the vibe of the 70s right, but the drama between the characters is largely made up. For the real story, read George Taber’s book, Judgment of Paris. He was the only one in the room, so his account is the gold standard.
- Visit the source. If you’re in Napa, a visit to Chateau Montelena is like a pilgrimage. The stone castle is still there, and the wines are still world-class.
- Look beyond the labels. The biggest lesson from 1976 is that labels and price tags don't dictate quality. Your palate is the final judge. If you like a $20 bottle of Chenin Blanc more than a $200 bottle of Bordeaux, you aren't "wrong." You're just being an honest taster, just like those French judges were—before they realized what they'd done.
The legacy of the judgment of paris wine isn't just about California beating France. It's about the fact that great wine can happen anywhere if the conditions and the craft are right. It leveled the playing field and made the wine world a much more interesting, diverse, and competitive place.