The legal tug-of-law over who gets to stay in the U.S. and who gets sent back just hit another massive speed bump. Honestly, it feels like every week there’s a new headline about the 1798 Alien Enemies Act, but this latest development is the one people are actually talking about in the immigrant communities from Miami to D.C.
A federal judge just basically told the Trump administration "not so fast." In a move that surprised some but was expected by legal scholars following the case, the court has refused to lift a critical block on the administration's plan for deporting Venezuelans.
This isn't just about paperwork. It’s about people. Specifically, it's about whether the government can use a centuries-old wartime law to bypass the usual court hearings and just start putting people on planes.
The Judge Refuses to Lift Block on Trump Deporting Venezuelans: The Breakdown
Chief Judge James Boasberg of the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia is the man at the center of this storm. He’s the one who recently looked at the government's request to clear the path for these removals and basically said, "No."
The administration has been leaning hard into the Alien Enemies Act of 1798. If that sounds old, it’s because it is. It was designed to let the president deport citizens of a "hostile nation" during times of war or invasion. The White House has argued that the presence of the Tren de Aragua (TdA) gang constitutes an "invasion," giving them the green light to skip the immigration courts entirely.
Judge Boasberg isn't buying it. At least, not yet.
He recently emphasized that "there is... a strong public interest in preventing the mistaken deportation of people." Basically, he’s saying that even if the government thinks someone is a gang member, they still have to prove it in a way that respects the 14th Amendment. You can't just round people up because of where they were born and fly them to a third country without a hearing.
👉 See also: Why Trump's West Point Speech Still Matters Years Later
Why the Alien Enemies Act is the Big Sticking Point
Normally, if the government wants to deport you, you go before an immigration judge. You get to argue your case. Maybe you apply for asylum. It takes a long time.
The Trump administration wants to skip all that. By invoking this 1798 law, they are treating the situation like a military conflict. They’ve already deported groups of Venezuelans to El Salvador—not even back to Venezuela—claiming these individuals were high-risk gang members.
But here’s the kicker: Boasberg noted that some of the people being swept up might have zero connection to any gang. He insisted that "before they may be deported, they are entitled to individualized hearings."
The administration is furious. They’ve called the judge an "activist" and have even floated the idea of impeachment. Chief Justice John Roberts actually had to step in and defend the judiciary's independence recently. It’s getting messy.
What Happens to the 137 Men Already Gone?
This legal battle has a very real ghost. Last year, the administration "secretly spirited" (Boasberg’s words, not mine) about 137 Venezuelan men out of the country and sent them to a prison in El Salvador. This happened right as the judge was issuing an order to stop it.
Now, the court is asking: "How do we fix this?"
✨ Don't miss: Johnny Somali AI Deepfake: What Really Happened in South Korea
- The Government's Stance: Marco Rubio and other officials have basically said the U.S. can't bring them back. They argue the men are now in Venezuela (following a prisoner swap) and are beyond "practical and diplomatic reach."
- The Judge's Order: Boasberg isn't letting it go. He’s suggested the government might have to facilitate remote bond hearings from Venezuela or find a way to return them for their day in court.
- The Contempt Threat: There is an ongoing inquiry into whether administration officials knowingly defied the court when those planes took off. That's a huge deal. If a cabinet member is found in contempt of court, we are in "constitutional crisis" territory.
The TPS Chaos: Another Layer of the Onion
While Boasberg is fighting over the Alien Enemies Act in D.C., another battle is raging in California and at the Supreme Court over Temporary Protected Status (TPS).
Last October, the Supreme Court gave the administration a win by allowing them to end TPS for hundreds of thousands of Venezuelans. Secretary of Homeland Security Kristi Noem argued that Venezuela is "more free today" and no longer meets the conditions for protection.
But wait—it’s not a total shutdown. If you have an Employment Authorization Document (EAD) with an expiration date of October 2, 2026, you might still be able to work. But the status itself is being stripped away.
It’s confusing as heck. One day a judge in San Francisco (Judge Edward Chen) blocks the termination, then the Supreme Court stays his block, then the 9th Circuit hears arguments again. For the average person living in a Venezuelan neighborhood in Doral or Katy, it’s a constant state of "do I pack my bags or go to work?"
The "Due Process" Shield
Despite the Supreme Court being generally more favorable to the President's border policies, they haven't given him a blank check on how people are removed. Even the high court has signaled that you can't just ignore due process.
That’s why this latest refusal by Judge Boasberg to lift the block is so critical. It acts as a shield. It says that while the government might have the right to change policy, they don't have the right to break the law to enforce it.
🔗 Read more: Sweden School Shooting 2025: What Really Happened at Campus Risbergska
What This Means for You (The "Next Steps" Part)
If you or someone you know is caught in this web, the situation is moving fast. Honestly, nobody has a crystal ball, but here is what the current legal landscape suggests you should do:
Check Your Documents Constantly
Don't assume your work permit is dead just because you heard "TPS is over." Many permits issued before February 2025 are still being honored through October 2026. Look at the "Card Expires" date and cross-reference it with the latest USCIS Federal Register notices.
Avoid Any Legal Trouble
The administration is specifically targeting people with "any" criminal ties to justify the use of the Alien Enemies Act. Even a minor misunderstanding can be used by the DOJ to argue you fall under the "gang member" umbrella, which lets them try to bypass the standard court system.
Keep a Lawyer on Speed Dial
If the "de-legalization" campaign continues, the window to file for other forms of relief—like asylum or family-based petitions—is closing. Because Judge Boasberg has kept this block in place for now, there is still a window where the "normal" rules of immigration law apply.
Watch the 5th Circuit and the D.C. Appeals Court
The DOJ is already signaling they will appeal Boasberg’s latest refusal immediately. We could see a ruling that changes everything by next month. The 5th Circuit is also looking at the Maduro "extraction" and how that affects the "hostile nation" status of Venezuela.
The reality is that the "block" is a temporary wall. It’s holding for now, but the pressure from the White House is immense. The next few weeks of hearings will determine if the Alien Enemies Act becomes the new standard for mass deportations or if it remains a relic of the 1700s.