The legal world just got hit with a sledgehammer. Honestly, if you haven't been following the chaos in D.C. federal courts lately, you’ve missed one of the biggest constitutional showdowns in decades. Basically, Chief Judge James Boasberg recently dropped a ruling that says the government messed up—big time. Now, a judge may require us to facilitate deported Venezuelans' return to the United States.
It sounds wild. The U.S. government being forced to fly people back? It’s real. This all stems from a group of about 137 Venezuelan men who were whisked away in the middle of the night back in March 2025. They weren't just sent back to Caracas. They were flown to El Salvador and locked in a "mega-prison" called CECOT.
Why the Alien Enemies Act changed everything
The Trump administration didn't use normal immigration law for these guys. They reached back into the history books and pulled out the Alien Enemies Act of 1798. Yeah, that’s a law from the era of John Adams. It’s a wartime power. The administration argued that the Venezuelan gang Tren de Aragua was basically an invading force, allowing them to skip the usual court hearings and just deport people instantly.
Judge Boasberg wasn't having it.
He basically said you can't just "spirit people off" to a foreign prison with zero due process and think the court won't notice. In late December 2025, he ruled that these men were denied their basic rights. He’s given the government a deadline to either bring them back or set up remote hearings that actually follow the law.
📖 Related: What Really Happened With Trump Revoking Mayorkas Secret Service Protection
A mess of logistics and politics
This isn't just a simple "buy a plane ticket" situation. It's a logistical nightmare.
- The Men are Gone: Most of these guys were eventually moved from El Salvador back to Venezuela as part of a prisoner exchange.
- The Government is Resisting: Secretary of State Marco Rubio and the DOJ filed objections on January 12, 2026. They say it’s impossible to find these people now.
- Foreign Policy Risk: Rubio’s team argues that trying to run court hearings in a country where the U.S. just helped depose the leader (following the extraction of Nicolás Maduro earlier this month) would be a disaster for "national security."
The administration is basically saying, "Look, the country is in chaos, we don't have an embassy there, and we can't guarantee these remote hearings won't be tampered with."
The human side of the "CECOT" flight
Imagine being one of those 137 people. One minute you're in a detention center in the States, the next you're in a high-security Salvadoran prison known for brutal conditions. ACLU attorney Lee Gelernt, who is leading the charge for the plaintiffs, says these men faced "serious risk of persecution."
The court actually tried to stop the planes while they were in the air back in March. The judge issued a stay. But the planes landed anyway. That’s why there’s now a separate investigation into whether government officials should be held in criminal contempt. It’s getting heated.
👉 See also: Franklin D Roosevelt Civil Rights Record: Why It Is Way More Complicated Than You Think
Why the judge may require us to facilitate deported Venezuelans' return right now
The core of the argument is about "constructive custody." Judge Boasberg argues that because the U.S. government handed these men over to El Salvador under a specific agreement, the U.S. still effectively "owns" the legal responsibility for them.
You can't just outsource your legal obligations to a foreign jail.
"Our law requires no less," Boasberg wrote. He’s standing on the principle that if the government can snatch someone and dump them in another country to avoid a judge, the "Great Writ" of habeas corpus becomes a joke.
What happens next?
The government is appealing to the D.C. Circuit. They want a stay on Boasberg’s order. They’re arguing that the judge is overstepping into foreign policy—a place where judges usually aren't allowed to play.
✨ Don't miss: 39 Carl St and Kevin Lau: What Actually Happened at the Cole Valley Property
Meanwhile, for the 600,000 other Venezuelans in the U.S. who just lost their Temporary Protected Status (TPS), this case is the ultimate bellwether. If the government can use the Alien Enemies Act to bypass the courts, then no one’s status is really safe.
Actionable insights for those affected
If you or someone you know is navigating the current Venezuelan immigration crisis, here are the concrete steps to take based on the latest 2026 rulings:
- Monitor the Class Action: If you were part of the March 15, 2025 removal flights, you are likely part of the "certified class" in Boasberg's court. Contact the ACLU or Democracy Forward to ensure your name is on their list for potential relief.
- Verify TPS Documentation: Even though Secretary Noem terminated TPS, the Supreme Court has allowed some work authorizations to remain valid through October 2, 2026. Check your EAD (Employment Authorization Document) carefully. If it was issued before February 5, 2025, it might still be valid despite the policy changes.
- Third-Country Risk: Be aware that the administration is increasingly using "third-country" deportations (like sending Venezuelans to Mexico or El Salvador). If you have a standing "Convention Against Torture" (CAT) protection, consult an attorney immediately to argue that a third-country removal is just a "backdoor" to the country where you face danger.
- Stay Prepared for Remote Hearings: If the court successfully forces "remote due process," you will need a stable way to be contacted abroad. Keep your contact information updated with your legal representation in the U.S.
The tension between the White House and the Judiciary is at a breaking point. We’re looking at a January where the "rules of the road" for immigration are being rewritten every single day.