Before he was the man in the white cassock waving from the balcony of St. Peter's Basilica, he was just Jorge Mario Bergoglio. A guy from Buenos Aires. A chemist's technician. A bouncer. Most people forget that part. We see the Pope and we think of the office, but the path of Jorge Mario Bergoglio to the papacy wasn't a straight line through the gilded halls of Rome. It was a gritty, complicated, and often controversial journey through the political minefields of Argentina.
He was born in 1936 to Italian immigrants. Think about that for a second. His father was a railway worker; his mother stayed home. This wasn't a family of prelates and princes. It was a family of workers. That’s why, when you see him today refusing to live in the Apostolic Palace, it’s not a stunt. It’s him.
The Chemistry of a Calling
Young Jorge didn't start in a seminary. He started in a lab. He graduated as a chemical technician, a detail that honestly explains a lot about his methodical approach to reform. He worked at the Hickethier-Bachmann Laboratory in Buenos Aires. Imagine the future Pope testing food samples. It’s grounded. It’s real.
Then came the respiratory illness.
In 1957, at the age of 21, he suffered from severe pneumonia and three cysts. They had to remove part of his right lung. This wasn't a minor hiccup; it was a brush with death that shifted his perspective. Not long after, he entered the Society of Jesus—the Jesuits. They are the "intellectual shock troops" of the Church, known for rigorous education and a certain level of independence that often irritates the Vatican bureaucracy.
He wasn't just a quiet monk, though. By 36, he was the Provincial Superior of the Jesuits in Argentina. That’s a massive job for a young man, and he stepped into it right as the country was sliding into the "Dirty War."
The "Dirty War" and the Shadow of Controversy
You can't talk about Jorge Mario Bergoglio without talking about the 1970s. This is where the narrative gets messy. Argentina was under a brutal military junta. Thousands of people "disappeared." The Church’s role during this time is still a subject of intense debate among historians and human rights activists.
Specifically, there was the case of two Jesuit priests, Orlando Yorio and Franz Jalics, who were kidnapped and tortured by the military. For years, critics whispered that Bergoglio hadn't done enough to protect them—or worse, that he had withdrawn his protection.
But history is rarely that simple.
Later evidence, including testimony from those who survived, suggests Bergoglio was actually working behind the scenes. He was hiding people on Church property. He was running an underground network to get dissidents out of the country. He chose the path of "quiet diplomacy" over public protest. Was it the right call? Some say it saved lives. Others, like the late journalist Horacio Verbitsky, remained skeptical. This tension defines the complexity of the man. He isn't a plastic saint; he’s a survivor of a very dark time.
From Buenos Aires to the Conclave
In 1998, he became the Archbishop of Buenos Aires. This is when the "Slum Bishop" persona really took root. While other high-ranking clerics were chauffeured in black sedans, Bergoglio took the bus. He cooked his own meals in a small apartment. He was a frequent visitor to the villas miseria, the shantytowns where the poorest of the poor lived.
He wasn't just doing it for show.
He once famously told his priests that they needed to be "shepherds with the smell of sheep." It’s a vivid image. It’s also a direct challenge to the clericalism that had insulated the Church for centuries. He clashed with the Kirchner government over everything from social policy to corruption. He was a thorn in the side of the powerful, even as he rose through the ranks to become a Cardinal in 2001.
Then came 2013. Benedict XVI resigned. A move no one saw coming.
The Cardinals gathered in the Sistine Chapel. Most experts were looking at candidates from Italy or Brazil. Bergoglio was the runner-up in the 2005 conclave, but by 2013, he was 76. People thought his time had passed. They were wrong. On March 13, 2013, the white smoke drifted up. The first Latin American Pope. The first Jesuit Pope. The first to take the name Francis.
Why the Jesuit Background Matters
To understand Jorge Mario Bergoglio, you have to understand Jesuit spirituality. Specifically, the Spiritual Exercises of St. Ignatius of Loyola. It’s about "discernment." It’s not about following a rigid set of rules; it’s about looking at the reality on the ground and finding God in that messiness.
This is why he drives traditionalists crazy.
He prioritizes mercy over dogma. When he famously said, "Who am I to judge?" regarding gay priests, he wasn't changing Church law. He was changing the tone. He shifted the focus from the bedroom to the boardroom—attacking "trickle-down" economics and environmental degradation in his encyclical Laudato si'.
He’s a pragmatist. He’s a reformer who knows he’s fighting a 2,000-year-old bureaucracy. He has fired bishops for covering up abuse and stripped powerful Cardinals of their titles. It’s been slow. Some argue it's been too slow. But the shift is undeniable.
👉 See also: The Robb Elementary Crime Scene: Why the Investigation Still Haunts Texas
What Most People Get Wrong
People like to put him in a political box. The Left loves his stance on climate change and poverty. The Right hates his stance on immigration and his openness to divorced and remarried Catholics.
But Bergoglio doesn't fit into American political categories.
He is deeply conservative on certain issues, like abortion and the male priesthood. He’s not a "liberal" in the way a New York politician is a liberal. He’s a Peronist-influenced Argentine Jesuit. His focus is on the "periphery"—the people forgotten by global markets and political systems. If you try to view him through a Democrat vs. Republican lens, you’re going to miss the point entirely.
The Bergoglio Legacy: Actionable Insights
So, what do we actually take away from the life of Jorge Mario Bergoglio before and after he became Francis? It’s not just about religious history. There are practical lessons here for anyone in leadership or advocacy.
- Proximity is Power: Bergoglio’s influence didn't come from a throne; it came from the bus rides and the shantytowns. If you want to lead a group, you have to be in the trenches with them. You can't lead from a distance.
- The Long Game of Reform: He didn't try to change the Vatican in a day. He’s been there for over a decade, slowly placing like-minded people in key positions. True change is rarely explosive; it’s a slow, grinding process of institutional shift.
- Embrace the Complexity: His actions during the Dirty War show that leadership often involves making impossible choices between two bad options. Acknowledging that complexity is more honest than pretending there’s always a "pure" path.
- Style is Substance: By choosing to live in a guest house (Santa Marta) instead of the palace, he sent a message that resonated more than any sermon could. Your lifestyle is your most loud-spoken policy.
Jorge Mario Bergoglio remains a polarizing figure because he refuses to play the role of the silent, ornamental Pope. He is a man of the world—a world he views through the eyes of the poor. Whether you agree with his theology or not, his transition from a chemist in Buenos Aires to the most powerful religious leader on the planet is a masterclass in the power of grounded, persistent leadership.
To truly understand the current state of the global Church, one must look past the vestments and see the Argentine Jesuit who still, in many ways, carries the dust of the villas miseria on his shoes. He has redefined the papacy as a mission of accompaniment rather than an office of condemnation. This shift, more than any specific decree, is his lasting imprint on history.
For those looking to understand the specific administrative changes he's made, researching the "Council of Cardinal Advisers" (the C9) provides a clear view of how he has decentralized power away from the Roman Curia. This group, representing every continent, ensures that the voices of the global South—Bergoglio’s home—are finally being heard at the highest levels of governance.