If you walked into a bar in Washington, D.C., in early 1865 and mentioned the name "Booth," nobody would have thought of a murderer. Not yet. They would have thought of a heartthrob. A celebrity. A man who leaped across stages with such terrifying energy that he once stabbed a co-star by accident during a stage fight.
John Wilkes Booth actor was a title he wore with immense, almost suffocating pride before history rebranded him as a monster.
Honestly, we have this habit of looking back at historical villains as if they were always lurking in the shadows, twirling a mustache. But Booth wasn't a shadow. He was the limelight. He was earning the 19th-century equivalent of $700,000 a year while the rest of the country was bleeding out in the mud of the Civil War. He was "the handsomest man in America." Women didn't just watch his plays; they waited at stage doors in swarms, desperate for a lock of his hair or a look at his "Corinthian" features.
The "Brad Pitt" of the 1860s?
Comparing 19th-century stars to modern ones is always a bit clunky, but people do it anyway. Some historians say he was like a Hemsworth. Others point to Leonardo DiCaprio. Basically, if you lived in a major American city during the 1860s, you knew his face. You'd probably seen him on a playbill for Richard III or Romeo and Juliet.
He wasn't just famous; he was "Booth famous."
The Booth family was the closest thing America had to acting royalty. His father, Junius Brutus Booth, was a legendary (and likely mentally ill) alcoholic who could mesmerize an audience one minute and try to jump off a steamboat the next. His brother, Edwin Booth, was the "serious" one—the greatest Hamlet to ever walk the boards.
John was the wild card. He was athletic.
He didn't just walk onto a stage; he exploded onto it. In Macbeth, he reportedly insisted on having a twelve-foot-high cliff built so he could jump off it in a single bound. He was a physical actor, a "scene-stealer" who used his body to distract from the fact that he was sometimes a bit lazy with his lines.
A Rough Start in Baltimore
It wasn't always rave reviews. Early on, the guy was a disaster.
💡 You might also like: Is Steven Weber Leaving Chicago Med? What Really Happened With Dean Archer
At seventeen, he made his debut at the Charles Street Theatre in Baltimore. He played the Earl of Richmond in Richard III, and he was so nervous he flubbed his lines. The audience didn't just stay quiet—they hissed at him. Imagine being the son of the most famous actor in the country and getting booed off the stage in your hometown.
One story involves him playing Ascanio Petrucci in a play called Lucrezia Borgia. He was supposed to introduce himself. He got so tongue-tied he ended up shouting, "Damn it, what am I?"
The audience roared with laughter. It was humiliating.
But Booth was vain. He was inordinately vain. That humiliation didn't break him; it fueled a desperate need to be seen as the best. He started using the pseudonym "J.B. Wilkes" just so people wouldn't compare him to his father while he was still learning how not to trip over his own feet.
Why the South Loved Him
There was a weird geographical split in the Booth family. Edwin, the more refined and technically superior actor, dominated the North and New York. John, partly because he wanted to escape his brother's shadow and partly because of his own politics, became the darling of the South.
By 1860, he was a massive star in Richmond, Virginia.
He loved the "Southern way of life." Even though he didn't come from a slave-holding family, he was a vitriolic white supremacist who saw Lincoln as a "Czar" and an "Abolitionist tyrant." While he was performing in light comedies or Shakespearean tragedies, he was also drinking brandy in hotel bars and railing against the Union.
People in Richmond called him "a natural genius."
📖 Related: Is Heroes and Villains Legit? What You Need to Know Before Buying
They loved his "Mephistophelean sneer" and his "pity-murdering laugh." He was the ultimate villain on stage, which is a bit on the nose when you think about it now. He was earning $20,000 a year by the time he was 22. That’s insane money for 1860. He was wealthy, he was idolized, and he was becoming increasingly unstable as the Confederacy began to crumble.
The Brutus Obsession
If you want to understand Booth's head-space, look at his favorite role.
It wasn't Romeo. It was Brutus.
The man who killed Caesar to save the Republic. In 1864, the three Booth brothers—Junius Jr., Edwin, and John Wilkes—performed Julius Caesar together as a benefit to raise money for a statue of Shakespeare in Central Park. It’s the only time they ever shared a stage.
- Edwin played Brutus.
- John Wilkes played Marc Antony.
- Junius Jr. played Cassius.
It’s one of those historical moments that feels scripted. John Wilkes was furious that Edwin got the "heroic" role of the assassin. In his own mind, he was the true Brutus. He later wrote in his diary while hiding in a tobacco barn that he was being "hunted like a dog" for doing exactly what Brutus was honored for.
He couldn't separate the theater from reality. To him, the assassination of Lincoln wasn't just a political act; it was the final performance of his life.
The Last Performance at Ford's
It’s a chilling detail: Booth was a regular at Ford’s Theatre.
He wasn't some stranger sneaking in. He was a guy who picked up his mail there. When he walked into the theater on April 14, 1865, the employees didn't stop him because they knew him. He was the John Wilkes Booth.
👉 See also: Jack Blocker American Idol Journey: What Most People Get Wrong
He chose the exact moment in the play Our American Cousin when he knew the audience would be laughing. There’s a line about a "sockdologizing old man-trap" that always got a huge roar. Booth knew the timing perfectly. He used the cover of the laughter to fire his derringer.
Then came the "stagecraft."
He didn't just run. He jumped from the presidential box down to the stage. It was a twelve-foot drop. He’d done similar leaps in Macbeth dozens of times. But this time, his spur caught on a Treasury flag. He landed awkwardly and broke his fibula.
He still stood up. He still shouted his line: "Sic Semper Tyrannis!"
He was playing the part of the tragic hero until the very end. Even as he was dying in Virginia days later, his last words were about his hands. "Useless, useless," he muttered, looking at the hands that had once held swords on stage and now were just the hands of a fugitive.
Understanding the Reality
If you're digging into the history of the John Wilkes Booth actor legacy, it’s worth moving past the "crazy loner" myth. He was a man with everything to lose—fame, wealth, and a career—who threw it away because he was radicalized by his own vanity and a toxic ideology.
To get a better sense of how he was viewed at the time, you should:
- Read contemporary reviews: Look for archives of the Chicago Tribune or the Richmond Dispatch from 1862-1864. The way they describe his "physicality" is a window into why he felt he could pull off the leap at Ford's.
- Compare him to Edwin Booth: Read Nora Titone’s My Thoughts Be Bloody. It’s the best resource for understanding the sibling rivalry that probably pushed John to do something "bigger" than any of Edwin's performances.
- Visit the sites: If you're in D.C., Ford's Theatre still has his derringer and the clothes he wore. Seeing the distance of the jump he made onto the stage makes his theatrical background much more real.
He wasn't a bit player. He was an A-lister who decided to murder his biggest fan—Lincoln had actually seen him perform and had even invited him to the White House (an invitation Booth declined). History is often stranger when you realize the villain was someone people used to clap for.
To explore more about 19th-century theater culture or the specific roles that defined the Booth dynasty, look into the digital archives of the Folger Shakespeare Library, which holds extensive records on the family's stage history.