Joe Rogan was right in the middle of a podcast recording with Charlie Sheen when everything changed. It was September 10, 2025. One minute they’re talking about movies and health, and the next, Jamie Vernon—Rogan’s long-time producer—walks in with a look on his face that usually means a technical disaster or a national emergency. It was the latter. News had just broken that Charlie Kirk, the founder of Turning Point USA, had been assassinated while speaking on a college campus in Orem, Utah.
Everything stopped.
Honestly, it’s one of those moments that feels surreal when you watch it back. Rogan, a guy who has seen and heard almost everything in his decades of hosting, looked genuinely shaken. He eventually walked out to the lobby, spoke with security, and came back to the mics to process what just happened. If you’ve followed the Joe Rogan on Charlie Kirk saga over the years, you know their relationship wasn't exactly "best friends," but that’s exactly why Rogan’s reaction was so poignant. He didn't have to agree with Kirk to be horrified by what happened.
The Day the Microphones Went Cold
When the news hit, the episode of The Joe Rogan Experience (#2378) took a dark, somber turn. Rogan didn't sugarcoat his feelings. He called the killing "dangerous" and warned that the country was sliding into a place where political violence was becoming a celebrated spectacle.
Rogan mentioned meeting Kirk once at a gun range. He described him as a "nice guy" and "intelligent," even while emphasizing that they didn't see eye-to-eye on plenty of social and political issues. To Joe, that wasn't the point. The point was the "sick" nature of a society that cheers when a 31-year-old is shot in the throat for his opinions.
Charlie Sheen, sitting across from him, called the event "seismic." It’s hard to argue with that. Kirk was a lightning rod, sure. He was the face of the young conservative movement, and he spent his days walking onto hostile campuses specifically to debate. But for Rogan, the assassination represented a failure of the "national dialogue" Kirk was trying to establish.
What Most People Get Wrong About Their Dynamic
There’s this weird assumption that because Joe Rogan leans libertarian or has conservative-leaning guests, he must have been a huge Charlie Kirk fanboy. That’s not really the case. Rogan has always been skeptical of rigid partisan activists.
✨ Don't miss: Why ASAP Rocky F kin Problems Still Runs the Club Over a Decade Later
However, Joe respected Kirk’s "balls." He respected the fact that Kirk would go to a place where he was hated, set up a table that said "Prove Me Wrong," and actually talk to people.
Rogan’s critique of the aftermath was even sharper than his reaction to the death itself. He went after the "sick lefties" and specific media takes—notably an MSNBC segment that his producer flagged—where people seemed to be rationalizing or even celebrating the tragedy.
"You’re allowed to disagree with people without celebrating the fact they got shot," Rogan said. It sounds like common sense, right? But in the heat of 2025’s political climate, it felt like a radical statement.
Why the Joe Rogan on Charlie Kirk Conversation Still Matters
We’re well into 2026 now, and the ripples from that September day haven't settled. If anything, they've gotten choppier. The suspect in the shooting was eventually charged with aggravated murder, but the cultural damage was already done.
The Joe Rogan on Charlie Kirk reaction became a focal point because Rogan represents the "exhausted middle" or the "independent-minded" crowd. When he speaks, people who don't watch Fox News or read The New York Times actually listen.
Joe’s fear—one he’s brought up in several episodes since—is that we’re being played. He’s argued that corporate interests and "foreign players" want Americans to hate each other this much. He’s basically saying that every time we celebrate a political opponent's demise, the "people at the top" win.
🔗 Read more: Ashley My 600 Pound Life Now: What Really Happened to the Show’s Most Memorable Ashleys
The Aftermath and the "Seismic" Shift
Since the assassination, Rogan has often revisited the themes of that day. He’s talked about how the course of American history might have been altered. Logan Paul even mentioned on his own podcast that Kirk "could've been president one day." Rogan didn't necessarily go that far, but he did acknowledge that Kirk was an articulate leader who was effectively reaching a generation of young men that the traditional GOP couldn't touch.
The fallout wasn't just in the podcast world, though:
- Media Suspensions: FCC Chair Brendan Carr threatened consequences for late-night hosts like Jimmy Kimmel after certain remarks following the shooting.
- University Firing: A UCLA DEI director was famously fired after posting that he was "glad when bigots die" in reference to Kirk.
- The "Meme" Arrests: There were even cases where people were briefly jailed or sued over memes related to the killing, sparking massive First Amendment debates.
Joe’s take on all of this has been consistent: "This can't be where we stay." He’s become increasingly vocal about the "us versus them" trap. He sees the labels—Republican, Democrat, Christian, Muslim—as tools used to keep us from realizing we actually have more in common than we think.
Understanding the Timeline
If you're trying to piece together the history of their public interaction, it's a bit of a scattered puzzle. Kirk wasn't a frequent guest on JRE. He spent more time in the "Club Random" style circles (he actually had a very long, surprisingly cordial debate with Bill Maher in April 2025).
But the Joe Rogan on Charlie Kirk connection is defined by that one day in the studio. It’s the moment Rogan realized that the "discourse" he loves so much—the long-form, three-hour rambling conversation—was under actual, physical threat.
Kirk was killed while doing exactly what Rogan advocates for: talking.
💡 You might also like: Album Hopes and Fears: Why We Obsess Over Music That Doesn't Exist Yet
Actionable Takeaways for Navigating the Tension
It’s easy to get sucked into the vitriol, especially when the algorithms are feeding you reasons to be angry every five minutes. If you want to take a page out of Rogan’s book on how to handle these polarized times, here’s how to start:
1. Practice the "Gun Range" Rule
Remember Joe's anecdote about meeting Kirk? He didn't talk about policy. He talked about him being a "nice guy." Try to separate a person’s political "avatar" from their actual humanity. It’s a lot harder to hate someone when you imagine them at a gun range, a grocery store, or playing with their kids.
2. Audit Your Information Diet
Rogan was disgusted by how different media outlets framed the assassination. Don't get your news from just one "silo." If you find yourself nodding along to every single thing a commentator says, you’re probably in an echo chamber. Seek out the long-form stuff—the debates where people actually have to defend their points for more than a 30-second soundbite.
3. Recognize the "Divide and Conquer" Tactic
Whenever you feel a surge of genuine hatred for a political figure, ask yourself: Who profits from me feeling this way? Usually, it's a media company looking for clicks or a political machine looking for donations.
4. Defend the Right to Disagree
You don't have to like Charlie Kirk. You can think his ideas were totally wrong for the country. But as Rogan pointed out, the moment we decide that "wrong" ideas justify violence, the whole "American Experiment" basically goes up in smoke.
Ultimately, the tragedy of Charlie Kirk and Joe Rogan’s reaction to it serves as a massive warning sign. We’re living in a time where words are being treated as violence, and actual violence is being treated as "social justice" by the fringes. Stepping back, cooling the rhetoric, and demanding a return to actual conversation is the only way out of the mess.
If Joe Rogan—a guy who built an empire on talking to everyone from Bernie Sanders to Alex Jones—is worried about the state of the union, it’s probably time for the rest of us to pay attention. Stay safe out there. Remember, you probably have more in common with your neighbor than the people on your TV screen want you to believe.