Honestly, nobody was truly shocked when the news broke, yet everyone seemed to have an opinion. On December 1, 2024, President Joe Biden did what he said he wouldn't do. He signed a full and unconditional pardon for his son, Hunter Biden. But that was just the opening act. As the clock ticked down to the final hours of his presidency on January 20, 2025, the scope widened significantly.
Biden pardons his family members—not just the son who had been the face of a years-long legal saga, but his siblings and their spouses too. It was a move that basically signaled a "bridge-burning" moment with the traditional norms he once promised to restore.
You’ve probably heard the talking points from both sides. One side calls it a "father's love" and a necessary shield against a looming "retribution" era. The other side sees it as the ultimate confession of a "crime family" narrative they’ve been pushing for years. The reality is usually messier and buried in the fine print of constitutional law and raw political survival.
The First Domino: Hunter Biden’s Sweeping Pardon
The December pardon for Hunter wasn't just a "get out of jail free" card for his existing convictions. It was a massive, preemptive strike. Hunter had been convicted in Delaware for lying on a federal gun purchase form and had pleaded guilty in California to federal tax charges. He was facing serious prison time.
But the wording of the pardon was what really raised eyebrows. It covered any federal offenses Hunter "committed or may have committed or taken part in" between January 1, 2014, and December 1, 2024. That ten-year window is crucial. It covers the entire period of his controversial involvement with the Ukrainian energy company Burisma and his business dealings in China—the very things House Republicans spent years investigating.
Key Fact: This was a "preemptive" pardon. While most pardons happen after a person has served their time or at least been charged, a president can technically pardon someone for crimes that haven't even been charged yet.
The Inauguration Day Surprise: The Rest of the Family
If the Hunter pardon was a lightning bolt, the January 20 move was a thunderstorm. Minutes before Donald Trump took the oath of office, the White House released a list of "prospective" pardons for the rest of the inner circle.
👉 See also: Why are US flags at half staff today and who actually makes that call?
The list included:
- James B. Biden (Joe’s brother)
- Sara Jones Biden (James’ wife)
- Valerie Biden Owens (Joe’s sister and long-time campaign manager)
- John T. Owens (Valerie’s husband)
- Francis W. Biden (Joe’s other brother)
None of these people were currently under indictment. None had been convicted of a crime in recent years. So why do it?
Joe Biden’s official statement was pretty blunt. He claimed his family had been "subjected to unrelenting attacks and threats" motivated by partisan politics. He basically said he didn't trust the incoming administration to play fair. By issuing these pardons, he effectively locked the door on any federal prosecutors who might have wanted to dig into the family's past business dealings once he was out of office.
Is This Even Legal? (And Is It Normal?)
Short answer: Yes, it's legal. Long answer: It's kinda complicated.
The U.S. Constitution gives the president nearly "plenary" (absolute) power to grant pardons for federal crimes. The Supreme Court has rarely touched this power. The only real limits are that it can't be used for state-level crimes and it can't stop an impeachment.
But "legal" doesn't always mean "normal."
✨ Don't miss: Elecciones en Honduras 2025: ¿Quién va ganando realmente según los últimos datos?
Most presidents try to avoid pardoning their own family because of the optics. It looks like "self-dealing." Bill Clinton famously pardoned his half-brother, Roger Clinton, for drug charges on his last day in office. Donald Trump pardoned Charles Kushner, his son-in-law Jared’s father. But a "blanket" pardon for an entire group of family members who haven't even been charged with a crime? That’s almost entirely unprecedented in modern history.
What Most People Get Wrong About These Pardons
A big misconception is that a pardon means "innocent." In the eyes of the law, it’s actually the opposite. The Supreme Court suggested way back in 1915 (Burdick v. United States) that accepting a pardon carries an "imputation of guilt" and that accepting it is a "confession of it."
By taking these pardons, the Biden family members aren't being declared "not guilty." They are being shielded from the consequences of potential guilt.
Another thing people miss is the "federal vs. state" distinction. If a district attorney in New York or a prosecutor in Delaware finds a state-level law that was broken, these presidential pardons are worth exactly zero. They only apply to federal crimes.
The Fallout: A Legacy in Question
For a guy who ran on "restoring the soul of the nation" and respecting the independence of the Department of Justice, this was a tough pill for many of his supporters to swallow. Even some Democrats felt let down. They worried it gave a "green light" for future presidents to treat the pardon power like a personal shield for their friends and family.
Republicans, naturally, went on the offensive. Representative James Comer, who led the Oversight Committee's investigations, called the pardons a "confession of corruption." They argued that if there was nothing to hide, there would be no need for a ten-year blanket of protection.
🔗 Read more: Trump Approval Rating State Map: Why the Red-Blue Divide is Moving
On the flip side, Biden's defenders argue he was in a "no-win" situation. They believe the Trump administration's "Department of Retribution" (as some critics called it) would have hounded Hunter and James Biden for the next four years regardless of the facts. In their view, Joe was just being a dad and a brother, protecting his kin from a political hit job.
What Happens Now?
The ink is dry, and the pardons are permanent. A new president cannot "undo" a pardon once it has been issued and accepted.
However, the political and legal ripples are still moving. Here is what we are seeing:
- Congressional Records: Even if they can't prosecute, GOP-led committees can still release reports and hold hearings to "air out" what they found during their investigations.
- State-Level Risks: State prosecutors are likely looking through old files to see if any local tax laws or business statutes were violated, though this is a much harder hill to climb.
- Reform Debates: There is renewed talk in D.C. about a Constitutional Amendment to limit the pardon power, specifically regarding family members. Don't hold your breath on that one, though—passing an amendment is nearly impossible in this climate.
Practical Takeaways
If you’re trying to make sense of the "Biden pardons his family members" news for a debate or just to stay informed, keep these three points in your back pocket:
- Broad Scope: These aren't just for the gun and tax cases we saw on TV; they cover a full decade of potential "uncovered" federal offenses.
- The "Preemptive" Factor: Most of the family members hadn't been charged with anything. This was a "just in case" shield against future investigations.
- Historical Precedent: While other presidents have pardoned family, the sheer scale and the "pre-charge" nature of these specific Biden pardons set a new, and controversial, benchmark for executive power.
The reality is that we probably won't know the full impact of these actions for years. Whether it was an act of mercy or an abuse of power depends entirely on which side of the aisle you're sitting on. But one thing is for sure: the "norms" of the American presidency just got a lot more flexible.
To stay updated on how these pardons might affect ongoing state-level inquiries, you should monitor the dockets of the Delaware and California state courts, as those are the jurisdictions where most of the underlying business activity took place.