Jar Jar Binks from Star Wars: Why We Were All Wrong About the Gungan

Jar Jar Binks from Star Wars: Why We Were All Wrong About the Gungan

It happened in 1999. A lanky, orange-skinned amphibious creature stepped into a pile of Bantha fodder on the big screen and changed the course of pop culture history forever. People hated him. Honestly, "hate" might be too soft a word for the visceral, borderline tectonic shift in the Star Wars fandom that followed the release of The Phantom Menace. Jar Jar Binks wasn't just a character; he was a lightning rod for every frustration fans had with George Lucas and his shiny, digital-heavy prequel trilogy.

But here’s the thing. Jar Jar Binks from Star Wars is actually one of the most important characters in cinematic history. That sounds like hyperbole. It isn't.

If you look past the "mesa" and the "yousa," you find a character that paved the way for Gollum, Thanos, and every other digital performance we take for granted today. He’s the reason Andy Serkis has a career. He's also a tragic figure in-universe—a clumsy outcast who accidentally helped dismantle a democracy. It’s heavy stuff for a guy who gets his tongue stuck in a podracer engine.

The Technical Miracle Nobody Wanted to Admit

We need to talk about Ahmed Best. He’s the actor behind the character, and he didn't just provide a voice. He was on set. He wore a prosthetic suit. He did the physical comedy. In 1997 and 1998, Industrial Light & Magic (ILM) was doing something that had literally never been done on this scale: a lead character who was entirely CGI but interacted seamlessly with live actors like Liam Neeson and Ewan McGregor.

Before Jar Jar, digital characters were mostly monsters or background set dressing. Think the T-Rex in Jurassic Park—brilliant, but it wasn't exactly delivering monologues or engaging in slapstick with the lead actors for two hours. Ahmed Best had to invent a movement style. He used a "weighted" gait to account for Jar Jar's massive ears and lanky limbs.

When you watch those scenes now, focus on the eye contact. It’s perfect. That was a massive technical hurdle in the late 90s. If Jar Jar Binks hadn't worked technically, George Lucas wouldn't have pushed the boundaries of digital filmmaking as far as he did. The tech used for the Gungan basically became the blueprint for the entire industry.

💡 You might also like: How to Watch The Wolf and the Lion Without Getting Lost in the Wild

Why the Backlash Was So Brutal

So, why did everyone flip out? It’s pretty simple: tone.

Star Wars was always "used future." It was gritty. It was Han Solo shooting first in a smoky cantina. Then, suddenly, we have this creature stepping in poop and yelling "Ouchie!" It felt like a betrayal to the fans who had grown up and wanted Star Wars to grow up with them. People felt Lucas was pandering to toddlers just to sell plastic toys at Taco Bell.

There was also a much darker side to the criticism. Many critics, including Joe Morgenstern of The Wall Street Journal, pointed out that Jar Jar's accent and mannerisms felt uncomfortably close to 19th-century minstrelsy tropes. While Lucas and Best have both vehemently denied any intentional racial coding—noting the character was inspired more by Goofy and Buster Keaton—the optics were disastrous for many viewers. It created a toxic cocktail of disappointment and genuine offense.

The Tragedy of Ahmed Best

We can’t discuss the legacy of Jar Jar without talking about the human cost. Ahmed Best faced a level of online vitriol that would be unthinkable today. This was the early days of the internet, the Wild West of fan forums. He was a young actor who thought he’d landed the role of a lifetime. Instead, he became a global punching bag.

Best has been very open in recent years about the suicidal thoughts he struggled with because of the backlash. It’s a sobering reminder that behind every "annoying" digital character is a human being who put their heart into the performance. Thankfully, the narrative has shifted. When Best appeared at Star Wars Celebration a few years ago, he received a massive standing ovation. The fans who grew up with the prequels—the "Prequel Generation"—don't hate Jar Jar. They love him. He’s part of their childhood.

📖 Related: Is Lincoln Lawyer Coming Back? Mickey Haller's Next Move Explained

The "Darth Jar Jar" Theory: Fan Fiction or Hidden Genius?

You’ve probably heard of the "Darth Jar Jar" theory. If you haven't, buckle up. Around 2015, a Reddit user named Lumpawarroo posted an incredibly detailed breakdown suggesting that Jar Jar was actually a highly skilled Force user and a co-conspirator with Palpatine.

The theory suggests:

  • Jar Jar's "clumsiness" is actually a form of Zui Quan, or Drunken Fist kung fu.
  • He performs physical feats (like a 20-foot standing backflip) that should only be possible for a Jedi.
  • He is constantly waving his hands when talking to people, almost like he’s using a Jedi Mind Trick.
  • He is always positioned near the centers of power, eventually becoming a Representative in the Galactic Senate.

Is it true? Probably not. But Ahmed Best himself has teased that there was more to the character’s original arc than we saw. He once tweeted, "It feels really good when the hidden meaning behind the work is seen. No matter how long it takes." This fueled the fire. Many believe Lucas intended for Jar Jar to be a "mirror" to Yoda—the unassuming, silly-looking creature who is secretly a master—but chickened out after the massive backlash to The Phantom Menace.

The Political Failure of Jar Jar Binks

Even if he isn't a Sith Lord, Jar Jar’s role in the Star Wars saga is incredibly dark. Think about it. In Attack of the Clones, it is Jar Jar Binks—the well-meaning, easily manipulated outsider—who stands before the Senate and proposes that Supreme Chancellor Palpatine be given "emergency powers."

This is the pivotal moment. This is how the Republic dies. Not with a bang, but with a Gungan trying to do the right thing.

👉 See also: Tim Dillon: I'm Your Mother Explained (Simply)

Palpatine used Jar Jar’s naivety as a weapon. By the time of Revenge of the Sith, Jar Jar is a ghost. He’s barely in the movie. He stands in the background of Padmé’s funeral, looking absolutely devastated. In the canon novel Aftermath: Empire's End by Chuck Wendig, we find out what happened to him after the war. He’s back on Naboo, working as a street performer. The adults shun him because they remember his role in the rise of the Empire. Only the children like him. It’s a heartbreaking, lonely end for a character who only ever wanted to help.

A Legacy Re-evaluated

Is Jar Jar annoying? Yeah, often. But he’s also a landmark in cinema history. He represents the moment movies changed forever. He’s a testament to the fact that you can’t always predict what an audience will embrace.

More importantly, the redemption of the character (and the actor) shows a maturing of the Star Wars community. We’ve learned that it’s okay for different parts of the franchise to appeal to different people. You don't have to like the slapstick to appreciate the technical wizardry or the tragic narrative arc.

How to Appreciate the Gungan Today

If you're revisiting the prequels, try to look at Jar Jar through a different lens. Stop waiting for him to be Han Solo. Instead, watch him as:

  1. A Silent Film Homage: Treat his scenes like a Charlie Chaplin short. The physical comedy is actually quite complex.
  2. A Pawn in a Grand Game: Watch how Palpatine subtly positions him. It makes the political subtext of the prequels much more interesting.
  3. A Technical Milestone: Look at the lighting on his skin. Look at how he interacts with the water. In 1999, that was magic.

Practical Steps for Fans and Creators

If you are a storyteller or a fan looking to dive deeper into the lore of Jar Jar Binks from Star Wars, here is how you can actually engage with the character beyond the memes:

  • Read "The Legends of Luke Skywalker": There is a great chapter in this book (and its manga adaptation) that touches on Gungan lore and how they are perceived in the galaxy.
  • Watch Ahmed Best’s Interviews: Seek out his "Star Wars Theory" interviews or his "The Redemption of Jar Jar Binks" podcast. It provides a vital human perspective on the "toxic fandom" phenomenon.
  • Analyze the Senate Scene: Re-watch the "Emergency Powers" scene in Episode II. Notice the silence in the room after he speaks. It’s one of the most consequential moments in the entire 9-film saga, and it rests entirely on his shoulders.
  • Explore the Canon Literature: Specifically, Aftermath: Empire's End by Chuck Wendig. It provides the definitive (and tragic) conclusion to Jar Jar's life story, which adds a layer of weight to his earlier appearances.

Jar Jar Binks was never meant to be the "cool" guy. He was meant to be the heart—clumsy, breaking things, and ultimately broken by a world too cynical for his brand of sincerity. Whether you love him or hate him, Star Wars wouldn't be the same without him.