You’ve seen them. Those swirling, neon-bright clouds and the deep black voids peppered with glittering diamonds. Since the first batch of James Webb Space Telescope images dropped in 2022, they’ve basically become the wallpaper of our collective consciousness. But honestly? Most of what we think we know about these photos is kinda wrong.
People tend to look at an image like the "Cosmic Cliffs" and think they’re seeing a literal snapshot, like something an astronaut would see if they looked out a window. They aren't. Not exactly.
The "False Color" Myth
Here is the first thing that trips people up: Webb doesn't see "color" the way your eyes do. It’s an infrared telescope. It sees heat. Human eyes are tuned to a tiny sliver of the electromagnetic spectrum, but the universe is hiding most of its best stuff in wavelengths we can’t perceive.
When scientists at the Space Telescope Science Institute (STScI) process James Webb Space Telescope images, they aren't just hitting "auto-enhance" in Photoshop. They use a process called "chromatic ordering." They take the longest infrared wavelengths (which would be invisible to us) and map them to red. The shortest ones become blue. The stuff in the middle? Green.
It’s a translation. Like turning a musical score into a painting. If you were standing right next to the Pillars of Creation, you wouldn't see those vibrant purples and golds. You’d probably see a dark, dusty haze. The "colors" are actually data. Red might represent complex organic molecules called PAHs, while blue might show where the hydrogen is being ionized by a hot young star.
Those "Little Red Dots" are Terrifying
Speaking of red, there’s been a massive buzz lately—literally in the last few days of January 2026—about these tiny, unassuming red specks found in Webb’s deepest fields.
At first, astronomers were scratching their heads. They looked like tiny, ultra-compact galaxies from the very beginning of time. But they were too bright. They shouldn't have been able to grow that many stars that fast.
A study led by Vadim Rusakov from the University of Manchester, published just this month, suggests these "little red dots" aren't galaxies at all. Or rather, they’re disguises. They appear to be supermassive black holes—some with the mass of 100 million suns—shining with the power of 250 billion suns. They’re wrapped in such thick "cocoons" of gas and dust that they only show up as these faint red dots.
It’s a bit like seeing a tiny ember in a campfire and realizing it’s actually a raging furnace viewed through a keyhole.
Why the Pillars of Creation Look Different Now
We have to talk about the comparison with Hubble. Everyone loves the Hubble Space Telescope. It’s a legend. But looking at Hubble vs. Webb is like comparing a foggy window to a screen door.
Hubble’s version of the Pillars of Creation (captured back in 1995 and 2014) is iconic because of its towering, opaque clouds of cold gas. It looks like solid rock. But when you look at the James Webb Space Telescope images of the same spot, the pillars look ghostly. Translucent.
This isn't because Webb has a "better" camera in the traditional sense. It’s because infrared light can slip right through dust. It’s like using a thermal camera to see through smoke. Suddenly, we can see the "protostars"—the literal embryos of stars—forming inside the dust. Those bright red orbs with the sharp spikes? Those are stars that just "turned on." They’re only a few hundred thousand years old. In space terms, they’re newborns.
The Physics of the "Spikes"
You’ve noticed those six-pointed stars, right? They look like Christmas ornaments. Some people think they’re a camera glitch or a filter.
Actually, they’re "diffraction spikes." They happen because of the physical shape of the telescope. Webb has a hexagonal mirror and three struts that hold the secondary mirror in place. When light hits those edges, it "bends" around them.
- Hexagonal mirror: Creates six primary spikes.
- Struts: Create four more, but NASA engineers cleverly aligned them so they overlap with the mirror’s spikes.
- Result: That signature eight-pointed star (six big ones, two smaller horizontal ones) that lets you know instantly you're looking at a Webb photo.
Hubble’s spikes were four-pointed because it had a round mirror and four struts. It’s basically a fingerprint.
Breaking the Universe (Sorta)
One of the biggest "controversies" in the space community over the last year has been the "Big Galaxy Problem." Webb found galaxies in the early universe that were way more developed than our current models of physics said they should be.
Some headlines claimed "Webb Broke the Big Bang."
Spoiler: It didn't.
What it did was show that we don't fully understand how fast stars can form. We used to think it took a long time for gas to settle down and start making stars. Webb’s images of JADES-GS-z13-0 (a galaxy seen as it was 330 million years after the Big Bang) show that the universe was a lot more efficient at building stuff than we gave it credit for.
We’re also learning about "Cosmic Dawn." Space used to be filled with a thick fog of neutral hydrogen that blocked light. Webb found a galaxy (GS-z13-1) that was somehow "clearing the fog" much earlier than expected. It’s like finding a flashlight turned on in a room where we thought the power was still out.
Misconceptions about the "Search for Life"
There’s a lot of hype that Webb is going to "see" aliens. Let’s be real: it’s not going to take a picture of a city on another planet.
What it does do is take a "spectrum." When a planet passes in front of its star, the star's light filters through the planet’s atmosphere. Webb’s instruments, like NIRSpec, break that light into a rainbow.
If there’s methane, carbon dioxide, or water vapor, they leave "gaps" in that rainbow—chemical signatures. Recently, Webb found methane and CO2 on K2-18 b, a "Hycean" world that might have a liquid ocean. It even found hints of dimethyl sulfide (DMS). On Earth, DMS is only produced by life (mostly phytoplankton).
Is it a "smoking gun"? No. But it’s the most exciting "maybe" we’ve ever had.
The Reality of "Empty" Space
One of the most profound James Webb Space Telescope images is actually the very first one: SMACS 0723. It’s a "Deep Field."
If you held a grain of sand at arm's length against the sky, that’s the size of the area this photo covers. It’s a tiny, tiny sliver of nothing. And yet, it’s packed with thousands of galaxies.
Look closely at that image, and you’ll see some galaxies look like they’re being stretched or melted, like they’re in a funhouse mirror. That’s "gravitational lensing." The massive cluster of galaxies in the foreground is so heavy it actually warps the fabric of space-time, acting like a giant magnifying glass for the stuff behind it.
What’s Next for You?
You don't need a PhD to appreciate this stuff, but knowing a little bit about the "how" makes the "wow" much bigger. If you want to dive deeper into these James Webb Space Telescope images, here is how to actually engage with the science:
Check the "Raw" Data
Most people don't realize that the raw, unprocessed black-and-white data from Webb is public. You can go to the MAST Portal (Barbara A. Mikulski Archive for Space Telescopes) and see what the telescope actually "sees" before the artists and scientists get to it.
Follow the "Picture of the Month"
ESA/Webb puts out a featured image every month with a breakdown of what the different colors actually represent. It’s the best way to keep up with things like the "Red Spider Nebula" or the "Phantom Galaxy" without getting lost in the jargon.
✨ Don't miss: Why the Apple Store Broadway New Haven CT is Actually Worth the Trip
Look for the "Diffraction Spikes"
Next time you see a space photo, check the spikes. If it’s got six big ones, you’re looking at Webb’s work. If it’s got four, it’s Hubble. It’s a fun party trick, honestly.
The telescope is currently orbiting the sun at the second Lagrange point (L2), about a million miles away from Earth. It’s out there in the cold, silent dark, staring back at our origins. Every image it sends back isn't just a pretty picture—it's a time machine. We’re literally watching the universe grow up.